This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Researchers compare health expectancy in Russia and Central Asian countries using a multifaceted approach to health

Understanding healthy and happy expectancy in former soviet countries
This study investigated the health situation in Russia and Central Asian countries using a multifaceted approach combining healthy life expectancy and happy life expectancy, which are negative and positive perspectives on health, respectively. Credit: Yuka Minagawa from Sophia University, Japan

The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked the start of a period ripe with political, economic, and societal changes. In many former Soviet countries, these abrupt and turbulent transformations posed massive challenges to health care systems. Together with spikes in job losses and economic hardships, this led to a steep increase in mortality rates that would later come to be known as the "post-Soviet mortality crisis."

However, this crisis did not affect all former Soviet countries equally. In particular, former Soviet countries in Central Asia, which include Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, saw a notably smaller rise in mortality than Russia. Unfortunately, while there have been extensive studies on the mortality crisis, not much is known about the in former Soviet countries from a health-related perspective.

To address this knowledge gap, Associate Professor Yuka Minagawa of Sophia University and Professor Yasuhiko Saito of Nihon University, both in Japan, set out to gain a better understanding of health in former Soviet countries.

"Past research has limitations in that most studies focus only on negative aspects of health, i.e., the prevalence of diseases, leaving it an open question to what extent a positive dimension of health, such as happiness and , contributes to the population's overall health status," explains Dr. Minagawa.

"Moreover, the high prevalence of chronic illnesses has become a major public health concern in this region, making it critical to assess not just the length of life but also the quality of life lived." This study was published in the journal Population Research and Policy Review.

The researchers employed a proposed in 1996 by the Dutch sociologist Dr. Ruut Veenhoven, who dedicated much of his work to understanding happiness from a sociological perspective.

Based on this framework, the researchers adopted a multifaceted approach to analyze health by estimating two types of health expectancy: (LE) and happy LE. The former refers to the average length of life spent in good health, corresponding to the "negative" dimension of health. In contrast, the latter refers to the average length of life spent in a happy state, which reflects a "positive" dimension of health.

The study primarily centered around comparing the health expectancy values between Russia and the Central Asian nations of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. The researchers gathered data from two sources: mortality data published by the World Health Organization and self-reported health and happiness data from the World Values Survey.

The findings revealed a situation that appears to be counter-intuitive. "We found that populations in Central Asian countries have significantly higher healthy and happy LE when compared to their Russian counterparts," says Dr. Minagawa. "This suggests health advantages in Central Asian countries over Russia, despite their lower levels of socioeconomic development."

While the healthy and happy LE values among Russians have increased over the past decade, the gap between Central Asian countries and Russia is still significant. For example, men in Central Asia can expect to live about 38 years in a happy state and 65 years in , whereas, for Russian men, these values drop to 33 and 45 years, respectively.

Interestingly, this work challenges our understanding of health and raises questions about what may be contributing to the healthier and overall happier lives of people in Central Asian communities compared to those of Russians.

"This study has an important bearing on the definition of health," remarks Dr. Minagawa, "Health tends to be measured by the presence of disease but, as stated in the definition proposed by the World Health Organization, a better understanding of health requires research focusing on both its positive and negative aspects."

Moreover, the general population health in Russia could start declining due to the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Thus, this study underscores the need to strengthen welfare policies that contribute to the well-being of Russians. Hopefully, the situation in former Soviet countries will improve, helping mend the wounds left by history.

More information: Yuka Minagawa et al, A Comparative Analysis of Health Expectancy in Central Asia and Russia: Negative- and Positive-Health Approach, Population Research and Policy Review (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s11113-023-09836-5

Provided by Sophia University
Citation: Researchers compare health expectancy in Russia and Central Asian countries using a multifaceted approach to health (2024, January 11) retrieved 19 July 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-01-health-russia-central-asian-countries.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Researchers assess water security of Central Asian countries

0 shares

Feedback to editors