Sense of justice built into the brain

May 3, 2011 in Neuroscience

A new study from the Karolinska Institute and Stockholm School of Economics shows that the brain has built-in mechanisms that trigger an automatic reaction to someone who refuses to share. In the study publishing next week in the online open access journal PLoS Biology, the subjects' sense of justice was challenged in a two-player monetary fairness game, and their brain activity was simultaneously measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). When bidders made unfair suggestions as to how to share the money, they were often punished by their partners even if it cost them. This reaction to unfairness could be reduced by targeting one specific brain region, the amygdala.

The study is based on the universal human behaviour to react with instant aggression when another person behaves unfairly and in a manner that is not in the best interest of the group. The researchers had 35 subjects play a money-based fairness game, in which one player suggests to another how a fixed sum of money is to be shared between them; the other player can then either accept the suggestion and take the money, or reject it, in which case neither player receives anything.

"If the sum to be shared is 100 SEK kronor and the suggestion is 50 each, everyone accepts it as it is seen as fair," says Dr Katarina Gospic. "But if the suggestion is that you get 20 and I take 80, it's seen as unfair. In roughly half the cases it ends up with the player receiving the smaller share rejecting the suggestion, even though it costs them 20 SEK."

Previous research has suggested that the area controlling the ability to analyse and make financial decisions is located in the and insula. Using fMRI, however, the researchers saw that the area controlling for fast financial decisions was actually located in the , an evolutionary old and therefore more primitive part of the brain that controls feelings of anger and fear.

To explore these results further, the subjects were either given the anti-anxiety tranquilliser Oxazepam or a placebo while playing the game. The researchers found that those who had received the drug showed lower amygdala activity and a stronger tendency to accept an unfair distribution of the money –despite the fact that when asked, they still considered the suggestion unfair. In the control group, the tendency to react aggressively and punish the player who had suggested the unfair distribution of money was directly linked to an increase in activity in the amygdala. A gender difference was also observed, with men responding more aggressively to unfair suggestions than women byshowing a correspondingly higher rate of amygdalic activity. This gender difference was not found in the group that received Oxazepam.

"This is an incredibly interesting result that shows that it isn't just processes in the prefrontal cortex and insula that determine this kind of decision about financial equitability, as was previously thought," says Professor Martin Ingvar. "Our findings, however, can also have ethical implications since the use of certain drugs can clearly affect our everyday decision-making processes."

More information: Gospic K, Mohlin E, Fransson P, Petrovic P, Johannesson M, et al. (2011) Limbic Justice—Amygdala Involvement in Immediate Rejection in the Ultimatum Game. PLoS Biol 9(5): e1001054. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001054

Provided by Public Library of Science search and more info website

4.3 /5 (7 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

JRDarby
May 03, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Built-in implies (at least at first glance) presence from birth, i.e. a genetic link. There's no information here whether this was nature or nurture, however.
PinkElephant
May 03, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Built-in implies (at least at first glance) presence from birth
That is indeed exactly what it implies.
There's no information here whether this was nature or nurture
Definitely nature, since:

1) As alluded to above, the amygdala is an old construct, and is present in all mammals (not just humans)

2) The effect manifested across all subjects, regardless of individual gestation/maturation/upbringing variances

And though the study doesn't mention it, the sense of fairness vs. injustice is well-developed even in the youngest, pre-verbal toddlers. For instance, take two of them and give a single candy to one of them, while the other receives two. Then watch what happens.
epicureous
May 03, 2011

Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
This article is fundamentally not true. Fairness is subjective; what one deems fair changes from person to person. The subjective response to fairness also changes in each person; wisdom, maturity... There a no universal acceptations for justice either. What one person deems correct and moral the next guy may not. We like to think that there is an innate universal moral code instilled in us from birth -there is no such thing as universal sense of right and wrong. Everything can be argued -and divided.

hush1
May 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Stockholmer syndrome anyone?
Who/what is captor?
Chemistry?
Money?
Food?
Gene?
God?
frajo
May 04, 2011

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
This article is fundamentally not true.
Do you mean the conclusions described in the article?
Fairness is subjective;
Of course, but not only. There is a biology-based factor which now is evidenced by scientific observations _and_ there is a cultur-based factor that you are referring to.
what one deems fair changes from person to person.
Depends on the situation.
The subjective response to fairness also changes in each person; wisdom, maturity...
Depends on the situation.
There a no universal acceptations for justice either.
Depends on the case. Psychical disorders are statistically irrelevant in this context.
What one person deems correct and moral the next guy may not.
Too general claim.
We like to think that there is an innate universal moral code instilled in us from birth -there is no such thing as universal sense of right and wrong. Everything can be argued -and divided.
Not for the mentally healthy; history proves you wrong.
frajo
May 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Stockholmer syndrome anyone?
I'm listening.
epicureous
May 04, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
@frajo yes the basis of the article, that would be why I used the word 'fundamentally' (look it up). I get the feeling that if you cannot even understand the first sentence I used that you are more than likely out of your league. You seem like the kind of person who would attempt to prove that acceptationally murder is wrong (death penalty /pro choice debates would prove otherwise).
hush1
May 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I'm listening.


:)
Frajo's captor. Curiosity. Also a result from a region of the brain. Curiosity. A prerequisite for empathy. Of course there is the symphony being played among fear, anger, pain and hunger in the regions of the brain as well.

Frajo's underlying, hidden assumption?
As long as we are healthy, we can do no wrong. Look at history
And besides, it's all situational.

The claim is general too.

The (imaginary or real)captor you empathize with determines your "universal human behavior".

Of course biological mothers are simultaneously Nature and Nurture. The implied substitute is Oxazepam.

On the other hand, "You seem like the kind of person who would attempt to prove that acceptationally murder is wrong..." is projection.

A strange, assuming captor.

Frajo's constructive criticism reached an unknown captor, an unmapped brain region of epicureous.
epicureous
May 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
@hush1 -sometimes I get lazy/frustrated w/ppl like frajo so I prodigiously appreciate your answer; yes- you are correct. I just didn't want to get into a determinism/free-will debate w/frajo.
frajo
May 05, 2011

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
yes the basis of the article,
An article cannot be "true". But its content may.
that would be why I used the word 'fundamentally' (look it up).
No need to; the command of Latin is better than that of English.
I get the feeling that if you cannot even understand the first sentence I used that you are more than likely out of your league.
Guess you don't want to talk about likelihood. Instead of questioning your command of English I tried to be polite.
You seem like the kind of person who would attempt to prove that acceptationally murder is wrong (death penalty /pro choice debates would prove otherwise).
Are you a native speaker? If yes, then please explain to me (I'm not a native speaker) why you use an adverb ("acceptationally") like an adjective and tell me its meaning. It's unknown to the Oxford Dictionary, to Google translate, and to urbandictionary.com.
6_6
May 06, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
we inherited the sense of justice from our creator - since we are created in his likeness that is why we experience qualities such as justice, love, compassion, wisdom, creativity, etc
JRDarby
May 06, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
we inherited the sense of justice from our creator - since we are created in his likeness that is why we experience qualities such as justice, love, compassion, wisdom, creativity, etc


You've never considered that maybe it's more of the other way around?
Ramael
May 06, 2011

Rank: 4.8 / 5 (4)
Justice is subjective, just like maturity and wisdom, they don't exist in the real universe, but this article defines the inherent mechanism that underlies the subjective desire for justice. After all, our decision making process is esentially the impulse to either introvert or extrovert. The perception of fairness is inherently selfish, but not without benefit, which is why it will always be subjective, but from an evolutionary perspective makes total sense as a survival mechanism. In the real universe fairness does not exist. Is it right to kill someone? No one cares. Except that little survival mechanism, which is not a human invention but an invention of evolution, and is likely shared by all mammals.
kevinrtrs
May 09, 2011

Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
an evolutionary old and therefore more primitive part of the brain that controls feelings of anger and fear.

It is suppositions like these which indicate quite clearly how evolutionary thought is hampering science. By having this kind of prejudice against the normal function of the brain, scientists tend to form incorrect views or ways of approach of investigation that obscures how the brain really functions.
By the way - if one subsequently removes the references to evolution, the actual operational science is not affected, which just goes to show how evolutionary thoughts cloud the judgement.
As for the topic itself, perhaps the investigators should also look at the presence/absence of such amygdala activity following various levels of strenuous exercise. Since it is well known that exercise lowers the levels of depression[and hence anxiety]by raising levels of dopamine and endorphins, it should be interesting to see if it has the same effect as the drug.
CSharpner
May 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Perhaps the logic of "fairness" is worked out in the prefrontal cortex, but once UNfairness is detected, an emotional response is triggered in the amygdala?
CSharpner
May 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
we inherited the sense of justice from our creator - since we are created in his likeness that is why we experience qualities such as justice, love, compassion, wisdom, creativity, etc

Show us your scientific research showing there's a "creator". Then, once that's been resolved, show us your scientific research suggesting a sense of justice came about a different way than current studies show. I noticed you left out "intelligence" in your list of attributes.
TheGhostofOtto1923
May 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
This article is fundamentally not true. Fairness is subjective; what one deems fair changes from person to person. The subjective response to fairness also changes in each person; wisdom, maturity... There a no universal acceptations for justice either. What one person deems correct and moral the next guy may not. We like to think that there is an innate universal moral code instilled in us from birth -there is no such thing as universal sense of right and wrong. Everything can be argued -and divided.
Smells like philosophy.
we inherited the sense of justice from our creator- since we are created in his likeness that is why we experience qualities such as justice, love, compassion, wisdom, creativity, etc
Smells like religion.

They both smell the same, curiously. And neither explains anything. For instance the study above and others like it enlighten us as to the true mechanisms behind morality and behavior. Neither god nor philo can do this. One works, the others dont.
Rank 4.3 /5 (7 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • A question about drug tolerance
    created3 hours ago
  • Poor nutrition leading to overeating?
    created21 hours ago
  • Math and dyslexia?
    createdMay 21, 2012
  • portable metabolism meter?
    createdMay 21, 2012
  • Rare medical conditions on 20/20 tonight
    createdMay 18, 2012
  • "Good" Cholesterol in Doubt
    createdMay 17, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

More news stories

Treating pain with transplants

A new study finds that transplanting embryonic cells into adult mouse spinal cord can alleviate persistent pain. The research, published by Cell Press in the May 24th issue of the journal Neuron, suggests that reduced pain r ...

Neuroscience created 9 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Researchers uncover new ways sleep-wake patterns are like clockwork

Researchers at New York University and Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University have discovered new ways neurons work together to ease the transition between sleep and wakefulness. Their findings, which appear ...

Neuroscience created 10 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Study shows how immune cells change wiring of the developing mouse brain

Researchers have shown in mice how immune cells in the brain target and remove unused connections between brain cells during normal development. This research, supported by the National Institutes of Health, sheds light on ...

Neuroscience created 10 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Reverse engineering epilepsy's 'miracle' diet

For decades, neurologists have known that a diet high in fat and extremely low in carbohydrates can reduce epileptic seizures that resist drug therapy. But how the diet worked, and why, was a mystery—so much so that ...

Neuroscience created 10 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Dementia patients reveal how we construct a picture of the future

(Medical Xpress) -- Our ability to imagine and plan our future depends on brain regions that store general knowledge, new research shows.

Neuroscience created 11 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


The Goldilocks effect: Babies learn from experiences that are 'just right'

Long before babies understand the story of Goldilocks, they have more than mastered the fairy tale heroine's method of decision-making. Infants ignore information that is too simple or too complex, focusing instead on situations ...

Aspirin may prevent recurrence of deep vein blood clots

(HealthDay) -- After suffering a type of blood clot called a venous thromboembolism, patients usually take a blood-thinner such as warfarin (Coumadin). But aspirin may do just as well after a period of time, ...

Intrauterine devices, implants most effective birth control

A study to evaluate birth control methods has found dramatic differences in their effectiveness. Women who used birth control pills, the patch or vaginal ring were 20 times more likely to have an unintended pregnancy than ...

Women trying to have babies face different clock problem

A new Northwestern University study shows that the biological clock is not the only clock women trying to conceive should consider. The circadian clock needs attention, too.

Whole genome sequencing of rare olfactory neuroblastoma

The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) and the Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center at Scottsdale Healthcare have conducted whole genome sequencing (WGS) of a rare nasal tract cancer called olfactory neuroblastoma ...

Stem-cell-growing surface enables bone repair

University of Michigan researchers have proven that a special surface, free of biological contaminants, allows adult-derived stem cells to thrive and transform into multiple cell types. Their success brings stem cell therapies ...