Neuroscientists find famous optical illusion surprisingly potent (w/ video)
June 27, 2011 in Neuroscience(Medical Xpress) -- Scientists have come up with new insight into the brain processes that cause the following optical illusion:
This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
The yellow jacket (Rocky, the mascot of the University of Rochester) appears to be expanding. But he is not. He is staying still. We simply think he is growing because our brains have adapted to the inward motion of the background and that has become our new status quo. Similar situations arise constantly in our day-to-day lives jump off a moving treadmill and everything around you seems to be in motion for a moment.This age-old illusion, first documented by Aristotle, is called the Motion Aftereffect by today's scientists. Why does it happen, though? Is it because we are consciously aware that the background is moving in one direction, causing our brains to shift their frame of reference so that we can ignore this motion? Or is it an automatic, subconscious response?
Davis Glasser, a doctoral student in the University of Rochester's Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences thinks he has found the answer. The results of a study done by Glasser, along with his advisor, Professor Duje Tadin, and colleagues James Tsui and Christopher Pack of the Montreal Neurological Institute, will be published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).
In their paper, the scientists show that humans experience the Motion Aftereffect even if the motion that they see in the background is so brief that they can't even tell whether it is heading to the right or the left.
Even when shown a video of a backdrop that is moving for only 1/40 of a second (25 milliseconds) so short that the direction it is moving cannot be consciously distinguished a subject's brain automatically adjusts. If the subject is then shown a stationary object, it will appear to him as though it is moving in the opposite direction of the background motion. In recordings from a motion center in the brain called cortical area MT, the researchers found neurons that, following a brief exposure to motion, respond to stationary objects as if they are actually moving. It is these neurons that the researchers think are responsible for the illusory motion of stationary objects that people see during the Motion Aftereffect.
This discovery reveals that the Motion Aftereffect illusion is not just a compelling visual oddity: It is caused by neural processes that happen essentially every time we see moving objects. The next phase of the group's study will attempt to find out whether this rapid motion adaptation serves a beneficial purpose in other words, does this rapid adaptation actually improve your ability to estimate the speed and direction of relevant moving objects, such as a baseball flying toward you.
Provided by
University of Rochester
-
How You Feel the World Impacts How You See It
Apr 03, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Study: Color plays role in perception
Apr 19, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Why older people are less astute drivers and how the answer could help us understand depression
Jan 25, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Not just your imagination: The brain perceives optical illusions as real motion
Feb 02, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Barrow scientists solve 200-year-old scientific debate involving visual illusions
Nov 20, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Limits to growth: Scientists identify key metastasis-enabling enzyme
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
0
-
Seeing is as seeing does: Spatially-structured retinal input in early development of cortical maps
Apr 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (4) |
1
-
Dreamless nights: Brain activity during nonrapid eye movement sleep
Apr 09, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (12) |
0
-
Take your time: Neurobiology sheds light on the superiority of spaced vs. massed learning
Mar 28, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (21) |
3
-
Your brain on 'shrooms: fMRI elucidates neural correlates of psilocybin psychedelic state
Feb 29, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (42) |
45
-
A question about drug tolerance
May 23, 2012
-
Poor nutrition leading to overeating?
May 23, 2012
-
Math and dyslexia?
May 21, 2012
-
portable metabolism meter?
May 21, 2012
-
Rare medical conditions on 20/20 tonight
May 18, 2012
-
"Good" Cholesterol in Doubt
May 17, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences
More news stories
Persistent sensory experience is good for aging brain
Despite a long-held scientific belief that much of the wiring of the brain is fixed by the time of adolescence, a new study shows that changes in sensory experience can cause massive rewiring of the brain, even as one ages. ...
Neuroscience
9 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Boundary stops molecule right where it needs to be
A molecule responsible for the proper formation of a key portion of the nervous system finds its way to the proper place not because it is actively recruited, but instead because it can't go anywhere else.
Neuroscience
10 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Locating ground zero: How the brain's emergency workers find the disaster area
Like emergency workers rushing to a disaster scene, cells called microglia speed to places where the brain has been injured, to contain the damage by 'eating up' any cellular debris and dead or dying neurons. ...
Neuroscience
10 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
|
Genetic 'reset switch' enables signaling pathway to induce multiple developmental outcomes for olfactory neurons
Within the nervous system, a handful of signaling pathways modulate development of a cornucopia of different neuronal subtypes. Even small alterations in neuron differentiation pathways can disrupt subsequent ...
Neuroscience
13 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
The auditory cortex adapts agilely with concentration
The birth of sensory perception on the human cerebral cortex is yet to be fully explained. The different areas on the cortex function in cooperation, and no perception is the outcome of only one area working alone. In his ...
Neuroscience
14 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Amino acid consumption associated with how fast cancer cells divide
For almost a century, researchers have known that cancer cells have peculiar appetites, devouring glucose in ways that normal cells do not. But glucose uptake may tell only part of cancer's metabolic story. Researchers from ...
'Personality genes' may help account for longevity
"It's in their genes" is a common refrain from scientists when asked about factors that allow centenarians to reach age 100 and beyond. Up until now, research has focused on genetic variations that offer a physiological advantage ...
Gene discovery points towards non-hormonal male contraceptive
A new type of male contraceptive could be created thanks to the discovery of a key gene essential for sperm development.
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments
A team of scientists at McMaster University has discovered a drug, thioridazine, successfully kills cancer stem cells in the human while avoiding the toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments.
Cyber exercise partners help you go the distance: Motivation gains can double
A new study testing the benefits of a virtual exercise partner shows the presence of a moderately more capable cycling partner can significantly boost the motivation by as much as 100 percent ...
Brentuximab vedotin effective in large-cell lymphoma
(HealthDay) -- More than half of patients with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) treated with the CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin achieve a complete ...
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That is a fundamental statement - "a purpose of benefit to an ability."
.1)Are the illusions discussed unique only to humans?
.2)In other words, what illusions enhance what abilities?
.3)Long ago, the only form of mobility were running, walking.
.4)Can illusions ever be subject to willful suppression?
.5)Some illusions enhance 'survival' abilities. This one too?
.6)Are there 'countermeasure' motions - potentially canceling the immediately about-to-be-perceived motion?
....
I have to stop here. I have data overflow from literally thousands of questions.
To the researchers:
All the best.