Skilled readers rely on their brain's 'visual dictionary' to recognize words

November 14, 2011 in Neuroscience

Skilled readers can recognize words at lightning fast speed when they read because the word has been placed in a visual dictionary of sorts, say Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC) neuroscientists. The visual dictionary idea rebuts the theory that our brain "sounds out" words each time we see them.

This finding, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Neuroscience 2011, matters because unraveling how the solves the complex task of reading can help in uncovering the brain basis of reading disorders, such as , say the scientists.

"One camp of neuroscientists believes that we access both the phonology and the of a word as we read them and that the area or areas of the brain that do one, also do the other, but our study proves this isn't the case," says the study's lead investigator, Laurie Glezer, Ph.D., a postdoctoral research fellow. She works in the Laboratory for Computational at GUMC, led by Maximilian Riesenhuber, Ph.D., who is a co-author.

"What we found is that once we've learned a word, it is placed in a purely visual dictionary in the brain. Having a purely allows for the fast and efficient word recognition we see in skilled readers," she says. "This study is the first demonstration of that concept."

Glezer says that these findings might help explain why people with dyslexia have slower, more labored reading. "It could be that in dyslexia, because of phonological processing problems, these individuals are not ever able to develop a finely tuned visual representation of the words they have encountered before," she says. "They can't take advantage of the fast processing of words using this dictionary."

Glezer and her co-authors tested in 12 using fMRI. They were able to see that that are different, but sound the same, like "hare" and "hair" activate different neurons, akin to accessing different entries in a dictionary's catalogue. "If the sounds of the word had influence in this part of the brain we would expect to see that they activate the same or similar neurons, but this was not the case, 'hair' and 'hare' looked just as different as "hair" and "soup". This suggests that all we use is the visual information of a word and not the sounds."

"When we see a word for the first time, it requires some time to read and sound it out, but after perhaps just one presentation of the word, you can recognize it without sounding it out," she says. "This occurs because our brain first uses phonology to encode the word and match the sound with the written word. Once we do that and encounter the word a few more times, we no longer need the phonology at first, just the visual input to identify the word."

"We hope these findings will serve as a foundation to examine reading disorders," Glezer says. "For example, if people with dyslexia have a problem forming this visual dictionary, it may be that there could be ways of helping train children with dyslexia to form a more finely tuned visual dictionary."

Provided by Georgetown University Medical Center search and more info website

4.3 /5 (9 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Isaacsname
Nov 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
" it may be that there could be ways of helping train children with dyslexia to form a more finely tuned visual dictionary "

I wonder if dyslexics could train their minds to differentiate between symbols by using different colors/shades of pigmentation ? Iow, for example, 3's would be a different value on a greyscale from E's, etc. Certainly their minds wouldn't overide color perception ?
hush1
Nov 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Glezer and her co-authors tested word recognition in 12 volunteers using fMRI. They were able to see that words that are different, but sound the same, like "hare" and "hair" activate different neurons, akin to accessing different entries in a dictionary's catalogue. "If the sounds of the word had influence in this part of the brain we would expect to see that they activate the same or similar neurons, but this was not the case, 'hair' and 'hare' looked just as different as "hair" and "soup". This suggests that all we use is the visual information of a word and not the sounds." - Glezer


"This occurs because our brain first uses phonology to encode the word and match the sound with the written word. Once we do that and encounter the word a few more times, we no longer need the phonology at first, just the visual input to identify the word." - Glezer


No. To both quotes.
Sound accesses all prior meaning. The last meaning ever to be attached is the most recent visual cue.
hush1
Nov 14, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
To help this researcher, I suggest fMRIing subjects born deaf and raised bilingually with visual input - Chinese and English. I promise you - you will get fMRIs like nothing you can come close to understanding or interpreting.

Again. Sound is physical. Re-categorizing all prior input from the most recent sound input. Without sound (deaf) the most prior visual inputs recategorizes all past visual inputs.

Extremely inefficient labeling of meaning.

The visual input has a double 'burden' - not only assigning meaning without sound. An additional assignment of meaning (and burden) to previous visuals occurs with the visual input.

The less meaning (associations) assigned to recent or newer input from limited senses or just one sense, the greater the confusion.
hush1
Nov 14, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Sooner or later the researcher will confront varying severity and form of dyslexia with the specific language used.
And will be asked to explain those differences.

The 'sound out' for the voiceless is meaningless. Sound 'categorizes' and accesses more efficiently all prior imprinted sensory inputs' informational content (meaning) than any visual stimuli was designed to do.
AmyRobinson
Nov 14, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Please take the underlined word ads out of this article! It is so distracting..
Moose Dr_
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
This topic scares me. There was a time when schools taught "whole word" reading -- building the visual dictionary to the radical avoidance of phonics -- sounding out words. Then there was a bit of a revival of phonics. Certainly, absolutely, when I read, I read "whole words". Yet when I encounter a word I haven't met yet, like a name, I sound it out. The phonics is a useful life skill.

Interesting, my children's kindergarten teacher figures out what words the children "know" by asking them to read the word upside down. It appears that the "whole word" reading part of the brain can read the upside down quite well; the phonetic reader, not so much.
Isaacsname
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
You guys have seen this, I assume ?

" Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. "
gmurphy
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
@Isaacsname, lol!, I raed taht wtih gaert dcffiutly :), perhaps this 'visual dictionary' they refer to is optimised by checking the first and last words?, I don't think it's fair to say that such jumbled words can be read without problem, it's quite challenging but fun.
Isaacsname
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
T---'s a G--d q------n, c-n y-o r--d t--s e----y ? Or is it m---e d-------t ?
Isaacsname
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
-onversl- , if we -emov- -h- -irs- -n- -as- -etter- in -h- -ord-, it -oul- -ee- -om- -eopl- -til- -a- -ea- it.
Isaacsname
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
When I was growing up, I had no television and few " toys ", instead, I had books and nature, so I read quite a bit. I read the novel Shgun in 3rd grade, for example. I developed my ability to scan and chunk text, because I saw that it's invaluable for reading large volumes of material, also for searching for pertainent words, ie; text relevent to my inquiries.

Spacing, imo, is important, even good readers are slowed down by spreading out text, also there are sets of logical progressions in conversations and text, iow, we don't have to think about the fact that the word " Kumquat " is almost never found after " Xylophone ".

I do think that this article fails to touch on a very important issue, I know I've mentioned it here on Physorg a few times, buuuut.." Stochastic resonance in visual perception "

http://en.wikiped...biology)

...I'd wager money that most people like me who see visual static are also quite adept at reading.
somgrl8
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
@gmurphy I read it with great ease. I always tested very well when it came to reading comprehension. I never read the paragraphs...(i never read the assigned books in school either and had the highest grades) I would read the question and then scan for words.
@hush1 Our brain collects data through our eyes, which is why we as humans have battled racism for eons. Here is an example of visual over verbal...my boyfriend has an incredible grasp of language. He is bilingual and english is his second language, (he has a better understanding than the majority of this country). He has difficulty with the word colonel. He says it how it is spelled, no matter how much I try to work on it with him. He doesn't have any problems with any other words.

hush1
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Our brain collects data through our eyes, which is why we as humans have battled racism for eons. - somgrl8

Visual data collection in the brain and racism - what is the connection between racism and collection?

Critical in 'bilingualism' is the distinction which 'order' the languages are acquired. If both languages are acquired simultaneously, then 'bilingualism' is not the correct descriptor.

The primates closest to humans in ancestry show superiority in visual retention - analogous to 'photographic' memory.
Why?
Because there is no additional meaning (associations)to sound and artificial symbols. The superior number recognition retention in primates closest to humans comes from the numbers' shape - not the number meaning. And shape in non-humans primates is primarily visual, not auditory.

Non human primates have not assign shapes to sounds the way humans have been forced to assign shapes to sounds that verbal/visual language acquisition unavoidably brings.
MrVibrating
Nov 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I'm reminded of an anecdote from an old Q.I. episode where it is suggested that Ambrose, bishop of Milan was noted by St Augustine as the first person in Europe who could read without moving his lips...

Makes one wonder; might this 'visual dictionary' be a recent aquisition..?
hush1
Nov 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Interesting thought. I assert we hear ourselves cry before our eyes are ready to focus. As if the 'auditory dictionary' leaves the 'starting line' first.

'Recent acquisition' ...as in, at the very latest since the genetic anatomical ability of speech?
MrVibrating
Nov 16, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Well, perhaps not The Latest, and perhaps, as with our speech centres, 'acquisition' might not be the best term but you get my drift; a recent development, be it re-specilisation of pre-extant nuclei or whatever. Too tenuous a link to draw any conclusions from course but if this visual dictionary is now optimised specifically for reading, and widespread literacy is only a few generations old, it's certainly tantalising from an evolutionary psychology perspective..
hush1
Nov 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
This article begins to approach your reasoning:
http://www.physor...ain.html

There is no such term as 'psychogenetics' - as if there are dormant gene expressions just waiting to be called on, once genetic anatomical changes occur. I get your drift. Thks.
hush1
Nov 17, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Here. The help readers need to know:
http://www.newsci...und.html
ascott
Nov 17, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I wonder if and how the data would change if any of the volunteers had been synaesthetes. Word recognition can be difficult if you don't like the color line-up of a particular word. Also, ones visual dictionary might take on more meaning-- more senses, etc.
AndoDoug
Nov 21, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Isn't the point that there's evidence that more parts of the brain are involved than previously thought? It strikes me as warranting further invstgtn - makes sense because you can look at a word and KNOW it's spelled wrong even if you don't quite know how to correct it: it doesn't match the entry in your visual dictionary so to speak.
Rank 4.3 /5 (9 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Brain uses internal 'average voice' prototype to identify who is talking

(Medical Xpress)—The human brain is able to identify individuals' voices by comparing them against an internal 'average voice' prototype, according to neuroscientists.

Neuroscience created 56 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Depression common among children with temporal lobe epilepsy

A new study determined that children and adolescents with seizures involving the temporal lobe are likely to have clinically significant behavioral problems and psychiatric illness, especially depression. Findings published ...

Neuroscience created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

The secret lives, and deaths, of neurons

As the human body fine-tunes its neurological wiring, nerve cells often must fix a faulty connection by amputating an axon—the "business end" of the neuron that sends electrical impulses to tissues or other ...

Neuroscience created 2 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Regenerating spinal cord fibers may be treatment for stroke-related disabilities

A study by researchers at Henry Ford Hospital found "substantial evidence" that a regenerative process involving damaged nerve fibers in the spinal cord could hold the key to better functional recovery by most stroke victims.

Neuroscience created 2 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Breakthrough on Huntington's disease

Researchers at Lund University have succeeded in preventing very early symptoms of Huntington's disease, depression and anxiety, by deactivating the mutated huntingtin protein in the brains of mice.

Neuroscience created 3 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0


Researchers find common childhood asthma unconnected to allergens or inflammation

Little is known about why asthma develops, how it constricts the airway or why response to treatments varies between patients. Now, a team of researchers at Weill Cornell Medical College, Columbia University Medical Center ...

Scientists discover molecule triggers sensation of itch

Scientists at the National Institutes of Health report they have discovered in mouse studies that a small molecule released in the spinal cord triggers a process that is later experienced in the brain as the sensation of ...

Multiple research teams unable to confirm high-profile Alzheimer's study

Teams of highly respected Alzheimer's researchers failed to replicate what appeared to be breakthrough results for the treatment of this brain disease when they were published last year in the journal Science.

Drug reverses Alzheimer's disease deficits in mice, research confirms

An anti-cancer drug reverses memory deficits in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health researchers confirm in the journal Science.

Antibiotics: A new understanding of sulfonamide nervous system side effects

Since the discovery of Prontosil in 1932, sulfonamide antibiotics have been used to combat a wide spectrum of bacterial infections, from acne to chlamydia and pneumonia. However, their side effects can include serious neurological ...

Economic incentives increase blood donation without negative consequences

Can economic incentives such as gift cards, T-shirts, and time off from work motivate members of the public to increase their donations of blood?