Simple mathematical pattern describes shape of neuron 'jungle'

Neurons come in an astounding assortment of shapes and sizes, forming a thick inter-connected jungle of cells. Now, UCL neuroscientists have found that there is a simple pattern that describes the tree-like shape of all neurons.

Neurons look remarkably like trees, and connect to other cells with many branches that effectively act like wires in an , carrying impulses that represent sensation, emotion, thought and action.

Over 100 years ago, Santiago Ramon y Cajal, the father of modern neuroscience, sought to systematically describe the shapes of neurons, and was convinced that there must be a unifying principle underlying their diversity.

Cajal proposed that neurons spread out their branches so as to use as little wiring as possible to reach other cells in the network. Reducing the amount of wiring between cells provides additional space to pack more neurons into the brain, and therefore increases its .

New work by UCL neuroscientists, published today in , has revisited this century-old hypothesis using modern . They show that a simple which connects points with as little wiring as possible can produce tree-like shapes which are indistinguishable from real neurons - and also happen to be very beautiful. They also show that the shape of neurons follows a simple mathematical relationship called a power law.

Power laws have been shown to be common across the natural world, and often point to simple rules underlying complex structures. Dr Herman Cuntz (UCL Wolfson Institute for ) and colleagues find that the power law holds true for many types of neurons gathered from across the animal kingdom, providing strong evidence for Ramon y Cajal's general principle.

The UCL team further tested the theory by examining neurons in the , a part of the brain where new are constantly being formed. These neurons grow and form new connections even in the adult brain, and therefore provide a unique window into the rules behind the development of neural trees in a mature neural circuit.

The team analysed the change in shape of the newborn olfactory neurons over several days, and found that the growth of these neurons also follow the power law, providing further evidence to support the theory.

Dr Hermann Cuntz said: "The ultimate goal of neuroscience is to understand how the impenetrable neural jungle can give rise to the complexity of behaviour.

"Our findings confirm Cajal's original far-reaching insight that there is a simple pattern behind the circuitry, and provides hope that neuroscientists will someday be able to see the forest for the trees."

Related Stories

New brain cells listen before they talk

Oct 30, 2007

Newly created neurons in adults rely on signals from distant brain regions to regulate their maturation and survival before they can communicate with existing neighboring cells—a finding that has important implications ...

A butterfly effect in the brain

Jun 30, 2010

Next time your brain plays tricks on you, you have an excuse: according to new research by UCL scientists published today in the journal Nature, the brain is intrinsically unreliable.

Recommended for you

Tackling neurotransmission precision

15 hours ago

Behind all motor, sensory and memory functions, calcium ions are in the brain, making those functions possible. Yet neuroscientists do not entirely understand how fast calcium ions reach their targets inside ...

What makes kids generous? Neuroscience has some answers

15 hours ago

It's no secret that people are judgmental, and young children are no exception. When children witness "good" or "bad" behavior, their brains show an immediate emotional response. But, according to a study ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MrVibrating
not rated yet Jun 20, 2012
Hardly an astonishing finding - it stands to reason the network is organised by efficiency.

But of course the fascinating thing is the implications for the nature of neural information encoding, as a function of this connective efficiency.

Kauffman et al covered these issues some time ago, albeit in relation to biochemistry and autocatalysing systems. It's encapsulated by his strings'n'rings thought experiment:

Suppose we have a random scatter of small rings, a ball of string & scissors. We want to connect all rings with the minimum number of strings. So we cut a length, connect two rings at random, put them back in position and continue likewise until all rings are connected into a 'supercluster'..

We find that the optimum number of strings to rings is 1:2 because each length of string has two ends, so connects two rings. If there's 40 rings we'll need only 20 strings, beyond which more become less useful. Conversely, less, and some islands will be left from the main cluster.
MrVibrating
not rated yet Jun 20, 2012
So, following that dynamic and its informational implications, perhaps optimum connectivity equates to "no information", whereas higher or lower represent "some information"..?

Sorry, pet theory alert...

(Edit: incidently, the same may apply not just to equilibrium connective (ie. spatial) entropy, but also temporal (ie. impulse freqs)...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.