Deconstructing motor skills: Separate aspects of development highlighted in study

by Peter Reuell
With the help of the zebra finch, Bence Ölveczky (left) and his team of graduate student researchers Farhan Ali (center) and Timothy Otchy found that the brain uses two largely independent neural circuits to learn the temporal and spatial aspects of a motor skill. Credit: Jon Chase/Harvard Staff Photographer

Hitting the perfect tennis serve requires hours and hours of practice, but for scientists who study complex motor behaviors, there always has been a large unanswered question—what is the brain learning from those hours spent on the court? Is it simply the timing required to hit the perfect serve, or is it the precise path along which to move the hand?

The answer, Harvard researchers say, is both—but in separate circuits.

Bence Ölveczky, the John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Natural Sciences, has found that the uses two largely independent neural circuits to learn the temporal and spatial aspects of a motor skill. The study is described in a Sept. 26 paper in Neuron.

"What we're studying is the structure of motor-skill ," Ölveczky said. "What we were able to show is that the brain divides something that's complex into modules—in this case for timing and for motor implementation—as a way to take advantage of the hierarchical structure of the motor system, and it imprints learning at the different levels independently."

To tease out how those independent circuits operate, Ölveczky and his colleagues turned to a creature well-known for its ability to learn—the zebra finch. The tiny birds are regularly used in studies of learning because each male learns to sing a unique song from its father.

In a series of experiments, Ölveczky's team used traditional conditioning techniques to change the timing of a bird's song by speeding up or slowing down certain "syllables" in the song. They could also change which vocal muscles were activated and have the bird sing at a higher or lower pitch.

"But when you change the pitch of a syllable, the duration doesn't change, and when you change the duration the pitch doesn't change," Ölveczky said. "It appears the for the two features are separate."

Additional evidence that the circuits for learning motor implementation and timing are distinct came when researchers lesioned the basal ganglia of the birds—the region of the brain long thought to play a critical role in song learning.

"The thinking had been that there was one circuit for song-learning in general," Ölveczky said. "We found that if we lesioned the basal ganglia and repeated the pitch-shift experiment, the bird could no longer use the information it got from our feedback to change its behavior—in other words, it couldn't learn."

Experiments aimed at changing the birds' timing, however, were just as effective, suggesting two separate learning circuits—with only one involving the basal ganglia.

Such independence and modularity is critical, Ölveczky said, because it allows different features of a behavior to be modified independently if circumstances change. Parallel learning of different features can also speed up the learning process and enable the flexibility we see in birdsong and many human motor skills.

"If you learn something—it could be your tennis serve, or it could be any behavior—and you need to slow it down or speed it up to fit some new contingency, you don't have to completely re-learn the whole thing, you can just change the timing, and everything else will remain exactly the same.

"In fact, 'slow practice,' a technique used by many piano and dance teachers, makes good use of this modularity," Ölveczky said. "Students are first taught to perform the movements of a piece slowly. Once they have learned it, all they need to do is get the timing right. The technique works because the two processes—motor implementation and timing—do not interfere with each other."

The hope among researchers, Ölveczky said, is that a better understanding of how birds learn complex motor tasks such as singing unique songs will help shed new light on the neural underpinnings of learning in humans.

"For us, this is inspiration to look at similar types of questions in mammals," he said. "The flexibility with which we can alter the spatial and temporal structure of our motor output is similar to songbirds, but our understanding of how the mammalian brain implements the underlying learning process is not anywhere near as advanced as for songbirds. The intriguing parallels in both circuitry and behavior, however, suggest a general principle of how the brain parses the motor skill ."

Related Stories

Songbirds shed light on brain circuits and learning

Sep 17, 2012

By studying how birds master songs used in courtship, scientists at Duke University have found that regions of the brain involved in planning and controlling complex vocal sequences may also be necessary ...

Recommended for you

Neurons express 'gloss' using three perceptual parameters

Sep 19, 2014

Japanese researchers showed monkeys a number of images representing various glosses and then they measured the responses of 39 neurons by using microelectrodes. They found that a specific population of neurons ...

Scientists show rise and fall of brain volume

Sep 19, 2014

(Medical Xpress)—We can witness our bodies mature, then gradually grow wrinkled and weaker with age, but it is only recently that scientists have been able to track a similar progression in the nerve bundles ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

MrVibrating
1 / 5 (1) Sep 30, 2013
I've long supposed that delineation and parallel processing of spatial and temporal components is one of the chief benefits of having two hemispheres - itself a happy accident of developmental morphology - and that as such, this must be a distinguishing feature of lateralised faculties - ie. spatial components of words such as their spectral shapes on the left (Broca's area etc.) and temporal components on the right, such as prosody etc.

There seems to be a universal left-right bias for representing increasing magnitudes or values, too - across cultures. Plus we tend to under or overestimate quantities depending on whether our bodies are leaning left or right...

I think an absolute left/right segregation of spatial/temporal processing is probably unlikely, and may differ between faculties, but there's a definite general bias towards right-temporal and left-spatial.

While the benefits mentioned in the article are good examples, processing expediency is probably the driving factor..
MrVibrating
not rated yet Sep 30, 2013
Quite incidentally, one might further suppose that certain psychological conditions may be related to less-than-optimal delegation of temporal / spatial components between hemispheres - say, if both are processing components predominately in one or other domain only, their respective outputs may conflict...

I'd take that last suggestion with a large pinch of salt though, it's pure speculation..