Brain imaging study reveals what makes some people more susceptible to peer influence

April 29, 2014 by Cher Thornhill
Brain imaging study reveals what makes some people more susceptible to peer influence
Credit: Tim Dobson

(Medical Xpress)—A brain area activated by group decisions can distinguish people more likely to conform to the will of a group, say researchers from UCL.

The team, led by Dr Tali Sharot, UCL Affective Brain Lab, monitored the brain activity of individuals in groups of five people choosing food or drink they'd like to consume before and after being told the most popular in their group.

The results showed that people were likely to conform to the most popular choice in their group if their original preference was different.

Caroline Charpentier (UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience) said: "Most people don't think their everyday decisions, such as having eggs on toast for breakfast or a pint of lager at the pub, are influenced by other people's preferences."

She added: "But our results suggest that when other people make different choices than you, for example your friends order beer while you order wine, your brain records this information and this signal is mirrored in your brain later on, for example when you order another drink, making you more likely to choose beer, even if you initially preferred wine".

The team, led by Dr Tali Sharot, used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to monitor the brain responses of 20 volunteers during a decision-making task, while 78 more volunteers completed the task simultaneously on computers located outside the MRI room. They came to the lab in small groups of five.

In one session, volunteers were shown 60 pairs of food and drink items and asked to select which item of each pair they would prefer to consume at the end of the experiment. Straight after making this choice, the participants were told which item most people in their group selected. This part of the experiment provided the volunteers with social feedback.

Volunteers then took part in a following session a few minutes later, when they opted again for which item they would prefer to consume from the same series of pairs, but this time made the choice for themselves and did not receive any .

After the experiment, the participants completed a personality questionnaire that assessed trait conformity, which measures their general tendency to follow other people's ideas and behaviours. Comparison of results from the choice experiment and conformity questionnaire indeed showed that people who scored high on trait conformity were about twice as likely to change their food choices to agree with the group decision as people who scored low for conformity.

What differed between the brains of people who were more likely to conform and people who held on to their own opinion?

The imaging study showed that the orbito-frontal cortex (OFC) – a region at the front of the brain that has been associated with emotional and social behaviour – was active during the two choice sessions and distinguished between these two groups of people.

Miss Charpentier said: "The orbito-frontal cortex was the only region specifically activated, and the first area to react to group disagreement. This region was activated both at the time of the initial social conflict (when your friends all choose beer while you prefer wine) and also later when you make an (when you order another drink for yourself)."

The OFC has previously been associated with emotions and . Some clinical studies have suggested that people with brain damage in the OFC may behave inappropriately in groups.

Miss Charpentier concluded: "When OFC activity during the initial social conflict is mirrored in your at a later time when you make an individual choice, you are more likely to change your choice and follow the group. This is what happens in 'high conformers'. In other words, it is the temporal dynamics of the OFC that distinguishes "conformers" from people who hold on to their own initial opinion".

Explore further: Scientists identify link between size of brain region and conformity

More information: The paper, titled "The Brain's Temporal Dynamics from a Collective Decision to Individual Action" is available online:

Related Stories

Researchers identify decision-making center of brain

March 11, 2014

(Medical Xpress)—Although choosing to do something because the perceived benefit outweighs the financial cost is something people do daily, little is known about what happens in the brain when a person makes these kinds ...

Recommended for you

New insights on how cocaine changes the brain

November 25, 2015

The burst of energy and hyperactivity that comes with a cocaine high is a rather accurate reflection of what's going on in the brain of its users, finds a study published November 25 in Cell Reports. Through experiments conducted ...

Can physical exercise enhance long-term memory?

November 25, 2015

Exercise can enhance the development of new brain cells in the adult brain, a process called adult neurogenesis. These newborn brain cells play an important role in learning and memory. A new study has determined that mice ...

Brain connections predict how well you can pay attention

November 24, 2015

During a 1959 television appearance, Jack Kerouac was asked how long it took him to write his novel On The Road. His response – three weeks – amazed the interviewer and ignited an enduring myth that the book was composed ...

Umbilical cells help eye's neurons connect

November 24, 2015

Cells isolated from human umbilical cord tissue have been shown to produce molecules that help retinal neurons from the eyes of rats grow, connect and survive, according to Duke University researchers working with Janssen ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 29, 2014
What can an orbitofrontal cortex-endowed animal do with smells? http://www.ncbi.n...17846157

Interview with Dr. Jaak Panksepp, Author of Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions

"My feeling is that the social brain has many levels. If you don't understand the foundational level, then you can do brain imaging until you're blue in the face, but you still will not understand the process at a deep causal level."

The insanity of continuing to report correlations with activity in the OFC without addressing biophysical constraints on cause and effect continues to both amaze and confuse theorists who "...refused to tether their hypotheses to... any biologically based discipline whatsoever (see for review Panksepp, Moskal, Panksepp, & Kroes, 2002). More than five decades of progress that directly links molecular epigenetics to behavior has been virtually ignored (Shapiro, 2012)..."

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.