Brain imaging study reveals what makes some people more susceptible to peer influence

by Cher Thornhill
Brain imaging study reveals what makes some people more susceptible to peer influence
Credit: Tim Dobson

(Medical Xpress)—A brain area activated by group decisions can distinguish people more likely to conform to the will of a group, say researchers from UCL.

The team, led by Dr Tali Sharot, UCL Affective Brain Lab, monitored the brain activity of individuals in groups of five people choosing food or drink they'd like to consume before and after being told the most popular in their group.

The results showed that people were likely to conform to the most popular choice in their group if their original preference was different.

Caroline Charpentier (UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience) said: "Most people don't think their everyday decisions, such as having eggs on toast for breakfast or a pint of lager at the pub, are influenced by other people's preferences."

She added: "But our results suggest that when other people make different choices than you, for example your friends order beer while you order wine, your brain records this information and this signal is mirrored in your brain later on, for example when you order another drink, making you more likely to choose beer, even if you initially preferred wine".

The team, led by Dr Tali Sharot, used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to monitor the brain responses of 20 volunteers during a decision-making task, while 78 more volunteers completed the task simultaneously on computers located outside the MRI room. They came to the lab in small groups of five.

In one session, volunteers were shown 60 pairs of food and drink items and asked to select which item of each pair they would prefer to consume at the end of the experiment. Straight after making this choice, the participants were told which item most people in their group selected. This part of the experiment provided the volunteers with social feedback.

Volunteers then took part in a following session a few minutes later, when they opted again for which item they would prefer to consume from the same series of pairs, but this time made the choice for themselves and did not receive any .

After the experiment, the participants completed a personality questionnaire that assessed trait conformity, which measures their general tendency to follow other people's ideas and behaviours. Comparison of results from the choice experiment and conformity questionnaire indeed showed that people who scored high on trait conformity were about twice as likely to change their food choices to agree with the group decision as people who scored low for conformity.

What differed between the brains of people who were more likely to conform and people who held on to their own opinion?

The imaging study showed that the orbito-frontal cortex (OFC) – a region at the front of the brain that has been associated with emotional and social behaviour – was active during the two choice sessions and distinguished between these two groups of people.

Miss Charpentier said: "The orbito-frontal cortex was the only region specifically activated, and the first area to react to group disagreement. This region was activated both at the time of the initial social conflict (when your friends all choose beer while you prefer wine) and also later when you make an (when you order another drink for yourself)."

The OFC has previously been associated with emotions and . Some clinical studies have suggested that people with brain damage in the OFC may behave inappropriately in groups.

Miss Charpentier concluded: "When OFC activity during the initial social conflict is mirrored in your at a later time when you make an individual choice, you are more likely to change your choice and follow the group. This is what happens in 'high conformers'. In other words, it is the temporal dynamics of the OFC that distinguishes "conformers" from people who hold on to their own initial opinion".

More information: The paper, titled "The Brain's Temporal Dynamics from a Collective Decision to Individual Action" is available online: www.jneurosci.org/content/34/17/5816.long

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Social media, social pressures and the power of opinion

Sep 21, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research from HP's Social Computing Research Group suggests that while social media and the recommendations of others can cause you to change your mind regarding a product or service, it i ...

Recommended for you

US aims for traumatic brain injury clinical trial success

11 hours ago

An unprecedented, public-private partnership funded by the Department of Defense (DoD) is being launched to drive the development of better-run clinical trials and may lead to the first successful treatments for traumatic ...

New learning mechanism for individual nerve cells

16 hours ago

The traditional view is that learning is based on the strengthening or weakening of the contacts between the nerve cells in the brain. However, this has been challenged by new research findings from Lund University in Sweden. ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JVK
not rated yet Apr 29, 2014
What can an orbitofrontal cortex-endowed animal do with smells? http://www.ncbi.n...17846157

Interview with Dr. Jaak Panksepp, Author of Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions

"My feeling is that the social brain has many levels. If you don't understand the foundational level, then you can do brain imaging until you're blue in the face, but you still will not understand the process at a deep causal level."

The insanity of continuing to report correlations with activity in the OFC without addressing biophysical constraints on cause and effect continues to both amaze and confuse theorists who "...refused to tether their hypotheses to... any biologically based discipline whatsoever (see for review Panksepp, Moskal, Panksepp, & Kroes, 2002). More than five decades of progress that directly links molecular epigenetics to behavior has been virtually ignored (Shapiro, 2012)..." http://dx.doi.org...i0.20553