Demand for cheap food is to blame for widespread chicken contamination

by Paul Wigley
Laced with disease-causing bacteria. EPA

More than two-thirds of chicken produced in the UK is contaminated with disease-causing bacteria, an investigation by The Guardian has revealed. Although the bug can be killed by proper cooking, it is estimated more than 300,000 people in the UK get diarrhoea from this bug every year. More than 100 people die as a consequence, and many more developing long term neurological and gastrointestinal problems.

Despite the burden of disease caused by the bacteria called Campylobacter jejuni, it has remained "under the radar", unlike the scares caused by bacteria such as Salmonella and Listeria in the 1980s and 1990s. The problem of Campylobacter is on the top of the agenda for poultry producers and the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and a major concern for our major retailers, but The Guardian believes that not enough is being done.

The intensive nature of production, transport, slaughter and processing gives the bug many opportunities to spread through flocks and between carcasses. In a large chicken processing plant, 200,000 animals may be slaughtered and butchered each day.

If the first flock on the line that day has Campylobacter infection, then there is a good chance that many of the whole birds or chicken portions leaving the plant that day will be contaminated. Good hygiene, cleaning and following the correct procedures are vital in reducing these risks, but it would seem corners are being cut and errors are being made that impact directly on food safety.

Two-thirds of chicken is contaminated – and demand for cheap food is to blame
Campylobacter jejuni is in your chicken. Credit: De Wood, Pooley, USDA, ARS, EMU., CC BY

How can the spread be controlled

Spread of Campylobacter is difficult to control in chicken production. Usually the bug survives in vast numbers in ' intestines. Although it can occasionally make chickens ill, it is normally carried with no observable effect on the bird.

The bug also spreads very quickly within a flock. It is not clear where Campylobacter comes from, though the practice of "thinning" is the single largest risk of a flock becoming infected. The practice involves selling lighter chicken for early slaughter to avoid overstocking, whilst retaining the remainder for slaughter at a greater weight.

The controls that have been successful in reducing Salmonella in chickens are less effective in reducing Campylobacter. There is also no vaccine available.

Some methods of controls are under investigation by FSA and the poultry industry. These include blast chilling, lactic acid treatment and bacteriophage treatment, but they are costly and in most cases of questionable efficacy.

Ultimately it is a difficult balance between providing cheap and nutritious food and maintaining for an industry that operates on small margins. There is no specific legislation for Campylobacter control, such as there is for Salmonella control. Introducing any legislation will increase cost, which could push production overseas where chicken can be produced even more cheaply but where standards in hygiene and animal welfare are lower.

Longer-term solutions

Ultimately on-farm controls, such as vaccines or breeding of birds that are more resistant to Campylobacter infection, are likely to be more successful. However, these are some way off and need greater support from government and industry. The focus on quick solutions to meet FSA targets on reduction of carcass contamination has to an extent ignored long-term solutions.

Another worry is that emerging variants of Campylobacter are more likely to leave the gut and contaminate the liver or muscle. This would make controls after slaughtering even less effective as they would be unable to penetrate into the organs.

The question I am often asked is: "Do you eat chicken?" The answer is "yes … but I ensure that any chicken I eat is thoroughly cooked and I always practice good hygiene within the kitchen to avoid cross contamination". At present this is the best, and perhaps, the only thing that can be done to reduce the risk of Campylobacter infection.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

UK issues dire warning on washing chicken

Jun 16, 2014

British authorities advised consumers on Monday against washing chicken saying that, contrary to common belief, the practice could lead to food poisoning.

Recommended for you

Overwhelmed west Africa escalates Ebola response

28 minutes ago

West Africa intensified its response to the deadly Ebola epidemic on Sunday, with Sierra Leone uncovering scores of dead bodies during a 72-hour shutdown and Liberia announcing 1,000 hospital beds.

Sierra Leone reaches final day of Ebola lockdown

3 hours ago

Frustrated residents complained of food shortages in some neighborhoods of Sierra Leone's capital on Sunday as the country reached the third and final day of a sweeping, unprecedented lockdown designed to ...

Sierra Leone faces criticism over Ebola shutdown

Sep 20, 2014

Sierra Leone began the second day of a 72-hour nationwide shutdown aimed at containing the spread of the deadly Ebola virus on Saturday amid criticism that the action was a poorly planned publicity stunt.

Presence of peers ups health workers' hand hygiene

Sep 19, 2014

(HealthDay)—The presence of other health care workers improves hand hygiene adherence, according to a study published in the October issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

zenataraxia
not rated yet Jul 26, 2014
It's not the people who eat this food who are "demanding" such extreme cheapness -- it's the corporate agriculture giants.

Any poll would find that nearly 100% of us would rather pay a little more than we do to stop what's now done with chicken: it is =shipped to China= for processing, then shipped back for sale and consumption. This is problematic on many levels:

1) China's food safety record is abysmal.

2) It's a serious waste of energy (and producer of greenhouse gases): while trains are wonderfully efficient transport -- one ton of freight can be moved 450 miles on one gallon of today's clean diesel -- ships use filthy bunker fuel, and get extremely poor "mileage".

3) Maintaining a continuous and adequate cold chain all that distance with several transfers between modes of transport is unlikely to happen, and there is insufficient oversight for anyone to even know when it has failed.

No one "demands" this but corporate agriculture. We'd spend more to keep it here.