Study finds African-Americans bear disproportionate burden of smoking costs in California

January 13, 2010, University of California - San Francisco

African Americans comprise six percent of the California adult population, yet they account for over eight percent of the state's smoking-attributable health care expenditures and 13 percent of smoking-attributable mortality costs, according to a new analysis by UCSF researchers.

In order to provide an objective picture of the disproportionate of for African American Californians, the UCSF team assessed data from 2002, including health care costs related to and productivity losses from smoking-caused mortality. Study findings are published in the January 2010 issue of the "."

"California has one of the most comprehensive tobacco control programs in the world, and smoking prevalence in the state has been declining steadily as a result. However, not all Californians have benefited equally from these efforts," said lead author Wendy Max, PhD, professor-in-residence of and co-director of the UCSF Institute for Health & Aging, School of Nursing. "Hopefully these data can be used to strengthen tobacco control programs and smoking cessation efforts throughout African American communities."

Researchers analyzed smoking-attributable costs for diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease, for which incidence is identified in the 2004 US Surgeon General Report as causally related to cigarette smoking. They focused on expenditures for ambulatory care, prescription drugs, inpatient care, and home health care. The team also assessed smoking-attributable mortality for Californians aged 35 years and older using three measures: deaths, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses.

Findings include:

  • African Americans lose more years (16.3) of life per death than other Californians (12.5 years) due to smoking-attributable causes. A total of 3013 African American Californians died of smoking-attributable illness in 2002, representing a loss of over 49,000 years of life and $784 million in productivity.
  • Adult smoking prevalence in 2002 for African Americans was 19.3 percent compared with 15.4 percent for all Californians.
  • The total cost of smoking for the African American community amounted to $1.4 billion in 2002, or $1.8 billion in 2008 dollars.
"It is clear that we need to tailor more tobacco control programs to African Americans in California," said Max. "In addition, there exists a long history of industry promotions and economic support targeted to certain ethnic groups, particularly and Hispanics. I would encourage these communities to carefully consider the benefits of such programs in light of the tremendous economic and human costs."

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Women run faster after taking newly developed supplement, study finds

January 19, 2018
A new study found that women who took a specially prepared blend of minerals and nutrients for a month saw their 3-mile run times drop by almost a minute.

Americans are getting more sleep

January 19, 2018
Although more than one in three Americans still don't get enough sleep, a new analysis shows first signs of success in the fight for more shut eye. According to data from 181,335 respondents aged 15 and older who participated ...

Wine is good for you—to a point

January 18, 2018
The Mediterranean diet has become synonymous with healthy eating, but there's one thing in it that stands out: It's cool to drink wine.

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Temple
not rated yet Jan 13, 2010
How is it disproportionate?

One cannot use overall population figures to say that the costs borne are disproportionate. It sounds as if the costs due to smoking are proportionate to the amount of smoking.

If a disproportionate amount of smokers are African American compared to the overall percentage of the population, that doesn't mean they bear a disproportionate cost.

Inside, all our lungs are pink. Until you smoke.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Jan 14, 2010
Inside, all our lungs are pink. Until you smoke.
Not really. I love using my pipes but you won't find anything black in my lungs. (Although I love black.)
The imprecise use of the word "smoking" should make us all a bit cautious.

Someone who takes "productivity losses" into consideration but not the economic advantages through "earlier" deaths for pension fonds is just a campaigner.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.