Study: Older investors are prone to mental misfires while playing the market (w/ Video)

January 29, 2010 BY ADAM GORLICK, Stanford University
Brian Knutson, associate professor of psychology and neuroscience

(PhysOrg.com) -- Brain scans highlight differences between old and young minds focused on investment choices.

Old age traditionally brings with it respect, experience and wisdom. But when it comes to making risky financial investments, an older mind is likely to make more mistakes than a younger one, Stanford psychologists say.

In a paper published this week in the Journal of Neuroscience, the researchers show that older investors make more errors when picking stocks compared to younger people playing the market. And that's not because of senility, memory lapses or other cognitive declines often associated with growing older.

Instead, the problem rests with a senior's ability to estimate value.

After having 54 men and women between the ages of 19 and 85 play an investment game while their brains were being scanned, the researchers found that older subjects were more prone to mental misfires while deciding to invest in one of two stocks.

Stanford researchers looking at the brains of older investors find less predictability.

results showed that greater variability or "noise" in a subcortical region of older people's brains was related to making the investment mistakes. This subcortical region - the nucleus accumbens - is critical for evaluation, while higher cortical circuits are more important for storing symbolic information like numbers and words.

"When we looked at their neural activation we didn't see problems in memory circuits, but we saw a noisier signal in value circuits," said Brian Knutson, associate professor of psychology and neuroscience.

Knutson conducted the research with fellow Stanford psychologists Gregory Samanez-Larkin and Daniel Yoo, along with Camelia Kuhnen, assistant professor of finance at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management.

Their subjects played a game in which they repeatedly chose to invest in either stocks or bonds. Some of the stocks performed well and had positive earnings over time, while others performed poorly.

The study showed that older people were just as willing as younger investors to make the riskier choice of buying stocks instead of bonds. But the seniors more frequently picked the stock with worse performance, usually because they made their choices before having a full picture of the stock's ups and downs.

While 20-year-olds made those mistakes 20 percent of the time, 80-year-olds made the errors 30 percent of the time.

The older subjects didn't seem to forget information about a company's gains and losses when it came time for them to pick a stock. Instead, their brain signals seemed to wander more while they were making their decisions.

"We don't know what causes the noise," Knutson said. "The subjects might have been thinking about their grandchildren or something else of value. The problem is that this signal variability may be leaking into the financial risk-taking task at hand."

As life expectancies increase and more seniors play the stock market, the Stanford team's findings could be used to help older investors make the best decisions with their money.

"By identifying the psychological processes that are being disrupted in older people, we may be able to target interventions that improve these brain signals," Samanez-Larkin said.

More information: Journal paper: www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/30/4/1426

Related Stories

Recommended for you

New neurons in the adult brain are involved in sensory learning

February 23, 2018
Although we have known for several years that the adult brain can produce new neurons, many questions about the properties conferred by these adult-born neurons were left unanswered. What advantages could they offer that ...

Do you see what I see? Researchers harness brain waves to reconstruct images of what we perceive

February 22, 2018
A new technique developed by neuroscientists at the University of Toronto Scarborough can, for the first time, reconstruct images of what people perceive based on their brain activity gathered by EEG.

Neuroscientists discover a brain signal that indicates whether speech has been understood

February 22, 2018
Neuroscientists from Trinity College Dublin and the University of Rochester have identified a specific brain signal associated with the conversion of speech into understanding. The signal is present when the listener has ...

Study in mice suggests personalized stem cell treatment may offer relief for multiple sclerosis

February 22, 2018
Scientists have shown in mice that skin cells re-programmed into brain stem cells, transplanted into the central nervous system, help reduce inflammation and may be able to help repair damage caused by multiple sclerosis ...

Biomarker, clues to possible therapy found in novel childhood neurogenetic disease

February 22, 2018
Researchers studying a rare genetic disorder that causes severe, progressive neurological problems in childhood have discovered insights into biological mechanisms that drive the disease, along with early clues that an amino ...

A look at the space between mouse brain cells

February 22, 2018
Between the brain's neurons and glial cells is a critical but understudied structure that's been called neuroscience's final frontier: the extracellular space. With a new imaging paradigm, scientists can now see into and ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

barakn
1.5 / 5 (2) Jan 29, 2010
And thus is revealed the real reason behind the push to privatize Social Security: to rob these people blind.
210
not rated yet Jan 29, 2010
Indeed.
AN older mind has more to consider having seen the mistakes and values of it's own youth/generation and, the two or three before it!

"The older subjects didn't seem to forget information about a company's gains and losses when it came time for them to pick a stock. Instead, their brain signals seemed to wander more while they were making their decisions.
"We don't know what causes the noise," Knutson said. "The subjects might have been thinking about their grandchildren or something else of value. "

The researchers called it noise: They do NOT call it a defect!

Further, one can see that the percentage of error over as much as a 60 year age difference, just was not THAT great, in fact, it is actually barely news worthy..hummmm.
However, one can always learn something new...!
I suspect together, the old timer and the younger mind could make quite a formidable force. Yes, an honorable Office Manager and an empirical data source would help to make this a most productive union

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.