In breakthrough, nerve connections are regenerated after spinal cord injury

August 8, 2010

Researchers for the first time have induced robust regeneration of nerve connections that control voluntary movement after spinal cord injury, showing the potential for new therapeutic approaches to paralysis and other motor function impairments.

In a study on rodents, the UC Irvine, UC San Diego and Harvard University team achieved this breakthrough by turning back the developmental clock in a molecular pathway critical for the growth of corticospinal tract nerve connections.

They did this by deleting an enzyme called PTEN (a phosphatase and tensin homolog), which controls a molecular pathway called mTOR that is a key regulator of cell growth. PTEN activity is low early during development, allowing . PTEN then turns on when growth is completed, inhibiting mTOR and precluding any ability to regenerate.

Trying to find a way to restore early-developmental-stage cell growth in injured tissue, Zhigang He, a senior neurology researcher at Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, first showed in a 2008 study that blocking PTEN in mice enabled the regeneration of connections from the eye to the brain after optic nerve damage.

He then partnered with Oswald Steward of UCI and Binhai Zheng of UCSD to see if the same approach could promote nerve regeneration in injured sites. Results of their study appear online in .

"Until now, such robust nerve regeneration has been impossible in the spinal cord," said Steward, anatomy & neurobiology professor and director of the Reeve-Irvine Research Center at UCI. "Paralysis and loss of function from spinal cord injury has been considered untreatable, but our discovery points the way toward a potential therapy to induce regeneration of following spinal cord injury in people."

According to Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation data, about 2 percent of Americans have some form of paralysis resulting from spinal cord injury, which is due primarily to the interruption of connections between the brain and spinal cord.

An injury the size of a grape can lead to complete loss of function below the level of injury. For example, an injury to the neck can cause paralysis of arms and legs, loss of ability to feel below the shoulders, inability to control the bladder and bowel, loss of sexual function, and secondary health risks including susceptibility to urinary tract infections, pressure sores and blood clots due to an inability to move the legs.

"These devastating consequences occur even though the spinal cord below the level of injury is intact," Steward noted. "All these lost functions could be restored if we could find a way to regenerate the connections that were damaged."

He and his colleagues are now studying whether the PTEN-deletion treatment leads to actual restoration of motor function in mice with spinal cord injury. Further research will explore the optimal timeframe and drug-delivery system for the therapy.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Brain training can improve our understanding of speech in noisy places

October 19, 2017
For many people with hearing challenges, trying to follow a conversation in a crowded restaurant or other noisy venue is a major struggle, even with hearing aids. Now researchers reporting in Current Biology on October 19th ...

Investigating the most common genetic contributor to Parkinson's disease

October 19, 2017
LRRK2 gene mutations are the most common genetic cause of Parkinson's disease (PD), but the normal physiological role of this gene in the brain remains unclear. In a paper published in Neuron, Brigham and Women's Hospital ...

Brain takes seconds to switch modes during tasks

October 19, 2017
The brain rapidly switches between operational modes in response to tasks and what is replayed can predict how well a task will be completed, according to a new UCL study in rats.

Researchers find shifting relationship between flexibility, modularity in the brain

October 19, 2017
A new study by Rice University researchers takes a step toward what they see as key to the advance of neuroscience: a better understanding of the relationship between the brain's flexibility and its modularity.

New procedure enables cultivation of human brain sections in the petri dish

October 19, 2017
Researchers at the University of Tübingen have become the first to keep human brain tissue alive outside the body for several weeks. The researchers, headed by Dr. Niklas Schwarz, Dr. Henner Koch and Dr. Thomas Wuttke at ...

Want to control your dreams? Here's how

October 19, 2017
New research at the University of Adelaide has found that a specific combination of techniques will increase people's chances of having lucid dreams, in which the dreamer is aware they're dreaming while it's still happening ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (6) Aug 08, 2010
It must be so very frustrating to people suffering with similar conditions... On one hand YES this is such a promising treatment yet at the same time this will continue to be relegated to the lab for a few more years and perhaps a human test being made public every once and again. Hopefully the procedure gets replicated in other countries where the path to being approved for human use is much quicker than here in the US.

Now I'm not going to debate on the speed at which medical approvals happen here in the US is good or bad but being someone who has a stage IVb cancer, I hope you can excuse me for leaning toward the faster is better mindset. I've been living on borrowed time for the past few years so that clearly has an influence on me.
4.4 / 5 (5) Aug 08, 2010
I completely agree with you. The medical approval procedure in America is far behind the pace of innovation. It is unfortunate this is the case in the country that does the majority of the world's medical research.

I think that Asian countries will be the best bet for access to "unproven" medical procedures, as it's unlikely the FDA will make it any easier in the near future. India and China may not be known for their healthcare, but I think that will change in the coming decade.
5 / 5 (5) Aug 08, 2010
But those Asian countries may also become known for the next Thalidomide. Looser regulations can cut both ways unfortunately.

I'm all for experimental and cutting edge medicine, but only if the patient fully understands that experimental medicine is potentially lethal. If you're going to die of cancer, or stuck in a wheelchair for the rest of your life, sure. If you're experiencing morning sickness (as was the case of Thalidomide) you should take something else and/or slug it out until the FDA is through with it.
5 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2010
Yep we all seem to be on the same page. In short these new medical procedures should have a faster track then they do now and without enormous amounts of red tape current fact tracking approvals have today. At this stage in my life ... I wouldn't think twice about undergoing a procedure that might only have a 20% chance of working ... Provided the researchers would learn from my participation even if the worst outcome came true.

A good example of this is the treatment of macular degeneration... My wifes dad is rapidly going blind and with little hope of recovery. Now just yesterday I learned that doctors in Germany have a treatment that they've been using for well over a year now. The treatment is quite simple and involves stem cells extracted from the patients own bone. It basically stops any further progression in both wet & dry versions of the condition. It seems to have some ability to reverse the damage but it seems to be limited. Here in the US citizens are still going blind.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 09, 2010
I have posted this link several times, and this is available now.
If your local chemist doesn't stock it try here.

Most people read the posts but never bother to go any further, I did and am alive because of this product.
3.5 / 5 (2) Aug 09, 2010
Approval time should be related to the severity of the illness and chances for making things worse. Cancer and paralysis treatments should be on really fast tracks; pimples and gray hair should be treated differently. Why is so hard to figure out???
Three and five year waits (or more) for terminally ill patients is ridiculous.
As long as it is impossible to sue someone if you have signed off on the dangers, then there should be little to no liability issues for the researchers.
4.8 / 5 (4) Aug 09, 2010
The problem is that it *isn't* impossible to sue the research company even if you've signed off on the dangers. It isn't uncommon for the families of test subjects to sue the companies preforming the tests, despite the fact that the patients knew darned well that it was a highly experimental treatment with potentially lethal consequences (...which covers every experimental treatment, pretty much).

Until the "sue their pants off because I spilt hot coffee on myself" culture in the USA goes away, companies and government labs will continue to take the cautious path with drug development.
not rated yet Aug 09, 2010
I have posted this link several times, and this is available now.
Most people read the posts but never bother to go any further, I did and am alive because of this product.

Wow, thanks... That's something I've gotta look into... I've got stage IVb lung cancer with no tumors... You'd think that was a good thing until you leered the cancer has taken over several lymph nodes. Between the two... Trust me you'd rather have a tumor somwere far away from your lymphatic system... It's like a super highway to everywhere else and let's the cancer pop up just about anywhere. Thanks again for that link... Gotta see what cancers it does well with.
2.5 / 5 (2) Aug 12, 2010
The FDA kept beta blockers off the US market for 10 years despite wide sucess in Europe. Beta blockers save about 10,000 lives a year.

The headline when they did approve the drug was "FDA approves new wonder drug to save an estimated 10,000 lives a year".

It wasn't "The FDA killed 100,000 before finally approving a drug that's worked for 10 years in the market".

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.