Why men 'exhibit warrior tendencies'

January 24, 2012
Human ancestral history of inter-tribal war has programmed men to exhibit warrior behaviour. Image courtesy of the Pitt Rivers Museum.

A new study has looked into how our psychology concerning war and conflict may have been shaped by our evolutionary past.

Following a review of current academic literature by , and anthropologists, the study concludes that men are biologically programmed to be warriors because of our deep ancestral history of inter-tribal war and . Meanwhile, females have evolved a response to threats from male outsiders where they 'tend and befriend' as a way of protecting their , suggests the study. 

In a paper published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, researchers from Oxford, VU Amsterdam, and Michigan universities argue that although these responses may have evolved as a way of coping with threats posed by outsiders, they 'might not be functional in modern times and are often counter-productive'.

The researchers suggest that the study may help us to understand the evolutionary and biological roots of the aggressive behavior between 'tribal' factions in today’s world. The study points out that in modern cultures, this 'evolved' behavior can be observed in large-scale conflicts between countries and nations as well as in relatively small-scale skirmishes, such as between supporters of rival football teams or street gangs. 

Professor Mark van Vugt, Research Fellow at the Institute for Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology (ICEA) at the University of Oxford, said: "A solution to conflict, which is an all too common problem in societies today, remains elusive. One reason for this might be the difficulty we have in changing our mindset, which has evolved over thousands of years. Our review of the academic literature suggests that the human mind is shaped in a way that tends to perpetuate conflict with "outsiders".  

"Our research finds that conflict between rival groups of men has presented opportunities to gain access to mates, territory and increased status. We believe this has resulted through natural selection in an evolved amongst men to initiate and display acts of intergroup aggression."

The study examines current literature by evolutionary that supports what is known as the 'male warrior hypothesis'. It finds that self-report surveys consistently show that men are, on average, more likely than women to demonstrate prejudice and discrimination against men who are viewed as outsiders – and this is true across different cultures and times.

The study cites research showing that men prefer group-based social hierarchies and are more likely to strongly identify with their own group than women. Studies that show how men are more motivated to work closely together within their group if they are competing against another group are also cited.

Current academic literature demonstrates how across all cultures have been more likely than women to initiate violence in order to win the fight, the study concludes. It also says the benefits for the males of this strategy, amongst humans and among other species, are that they gain more in the group at their disposal, which results in them being more likely to successfully reproduce.

Professor Van Vugt said: "We see similar behavior in chimpanzees. For example, the males continuously monitor the borders of their territory. If a female from another group comes along, she may be persuaded to emigrate to his group. When a male strays too far, however, he is likely to be brutally beaten and possibly killed."

Explore further: Prejudice linked to women's menstrual cycle

Related Stories

Prejudice linked to women's menstrual cycle

June 22, 2011

Women's bias against male strangers increases when women are fertile, suggesting prejudice may be partly fueled by genetics, according to a study by Michigan State University psychology researchers.

'Paranoia' about rivals alters insect mating behavior

August 8, 2011

Scientists at the University of Liverpool have found that male fruitflies experience a type of 'paranoia' in the presence of another male, which doubles the length of time they mate with a female, despite the female of the ...

Recommended for you

Study shows there's a positive side to worrying

April 27, 2017

Worry - it does a body good. And, the mind as well. A new paper by Kate Sweeny, psychology professor at the University of California, Riverside, argues there's an upside to worrying.

Study links cannabis use in adolescence to schizophrenia

April 26, 2017

Scientists believe that schizophrenia, a disorder caused by an imbalance in the brain's chemical reactions, is triggered by a genetic interaction with environmental factors. A new Tel Aviv University study published in Human ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Jan 24, 2012
So basically, to get the genes in line with modernity, we need to pull a Lysistrata: women should favor the men who aren't warmongers, resulting in the warmongers being selected out. However, this suffers from union dynamics: if everyone doesn't agree, the dissenters can break the strike and accrue massive benefit.

In this case, the warmonger guys can stomp all over the pacifists and get all the women.

Or, some of the ladies have an even bigger pool of (disenfranchised) warmongers to choose from.
not rated yet Jan 24, 2012
then corban, the one group that renegs on that, rules the world... as is happening between the country that practices ideological pronouncements claiming that the other does it,when the other actually doesnt... in the land of the blind the one eyed woman is king...
not rated yet Jan 25, 2012
Life has always been a competition for resources and reproduction. From the first simple single cells through today. I don't think that can ever be changed.
not rated yet Jan 25, 2012
Eunuchs are the best. They won't take your women, endanger your children or be involved in sex scandals or engage in nepotism, and they've passed a great test of loyalty. Some of the most persevering societies were administered by eunuchs.
not rated yet Jan 28, 2012
You should not compare humans with chimpanzees. Humans' ultimate goals is to .....
not rated yet Jan 28, 2012
Humans' ultimate goal might be to fill in the ciints!
not rated yet Jan 29, 2012
Where is Otto?
Although this is behaviorism the commentator Otto might feel his views as vindicated with the sentiments express as 'research' from the researchers this article reports.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.