Study: Stroke victims not receiving timely diagnosis, care

May 2, 2012

The mantra in stroke care is "time is brain." With each passing minute more brain cells are irretrievably lost and, because of this, timely diagnosis and treatment is essential to increase the chances for recovery. While significant strides have been made to improve the response time of caregivers, a new study shows that a critical step in the process – imaging of the brain to determine the nature of the stroke – is still occurring too slowly at too many hospitals.

A study out this month in the journal Stroke shows that only 41.7 percent of stroke patients underwent imaging within the recommended 25 minutes of their arrival at a hospital. It also found that certain individuals, including people with diabetes, those over 75 years of age, women, those that did not arrive by ambulance, non-whites, and those with certain cardiac conditions were less likely to receive a timely brain scan. These delays potentially mean that treatment will come either too late or not at all.

"We were struck by the fact that less than half of patients with acute stroke symptoms did not receive a brain scan within recommended guidelines," said University of Rochester Medical Center neurologist Adam Kelly, M.D., lead author of the study. "This was the performance of hospitals who are actively participating in a national quality improvement program, so rates in non-participating hospitals may be even worse."

Imaging the brain is an essential tool in the diagnosis of a stroke and determines which treatment option physicians will pursue. Strokes caused by a blockage in one of the arteries that serve the brain – called ischemic strokes – are candidates for the clot-busting drug tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), which can restore blood flow and improve clinical outcomes. However, this drug cannot be used when the symptoms are instead caused by a ruptured blood vessel in the brain. Furthermore, in order for tPA to be most effective it must be administered as soon as possible and within three hours of the onset of symptoms. It is therefore essential that physicians are able to "see" what is occurring in the brain, and quickly.

Several national organizations, including the American Heart Association (AHA), have created guidelines for emergency stroke care. An AHA quality improvement program, called Get with the Guidelines, is used to evaluate and recognize hospitals for their quality of stroke care. The program collects data and quality measures – such as the amount of time to complete an MRI or CT scan of a suspected stroke patient's brain – from each enrolled hospital. At the time of the study, 1,199 hospitals across the nation were participating in the Get with the Guidelines program.

The study's authors used the AHA data collected by the program to analyze the imaging times for 40,777 stroke patients who were candidates for tPA – had an ischemic stroke, arrived at the hospital within the three hour window, and did not have other conditions that precluded the use of tPA. In addition to low overall compliance with the brain imaging guidelines, the authors also found that individuals were less likely to receive timely brain scans if:

  • They did not arrive at the hospital by ambulance (47 percent less likely);
  • Were of non-white race, even though blacks and certain other ethnic/racial groups have a higher incidence of stroke; and
  • Had certain known risk factors for stroke such as diabetes, a prior history of stroke, over 75 years old, and peripheral vascular disease.

In terms of clinical outcomes, the study showed that delays in diagnostic imaging can translate into missed or delayed treatment as well. Patients who received brain imaging within the recommended 25 minute period were much more likely to receive tPA (63 percent) compared to those not meeting this recommendation (38 percent). Furthermore, when tPA was administered, it was given earlier in patients who were imaged quickly. Earlier treatment with tPA is associated with improved functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke.

"Despite the strides that have been made in stroke care, it is clear that there is significant room for improvement in the evaluation of patients suspected of ," said Kelly. "Time is too precious and hospitals cannot be the reason for delay."

Explore further: Use of clot busters for stroke increased from 2005 to 2009, but still low

Related Stories

Use of clot busters for stroke increased from 2005 to 2009, but still low

June 2, 2011
The use of clot-busting drugs to treat acute ischemic stroke increased from 2005 through 2009 — but is still low, according to research reported in Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association.

New research identifies key reasons racial disparities exist in emergent stroke treatment

June 30, 2011
African-Americans are less likely than whites to receive critical stroke treatment primarily because they do not get to a hospital soon enough for time-sensitive treatment and because of preexisting medical conditions. For ...

Recommended for you

Could aggressive blood pressure treatments lead to kidney damage?

July 18, 2017
Aggressive combination treatments for high blood pressure that are intended to protect the kidneys may actually be damaging the organs, new research from the University of Virginia School of Medicine suggests.

Quantifying effectiveness of treatment for irregular heartbeat

July 17, 2017
In a small proof-of-concept study, researchers at Johns Hopkins report a complex mathematical method to measure electrical communications within the heart can successfully predict the effectiveness of catheter ablation, the ...

Concerns over side effects of statins stopping stroke survivors taking medication

July 17, 2017
Negative media coverage of the side effects associated with taking statins, and patients' own experiences of taking the drugs, are among the reasons cited by stroke survivors and their carers for stopping taking potentially ...

Study discovers anticoagulant drugs are being prescribed against safety advice

July 17, 2017
A study by researchers at the University of Birmingham has shown that GPs are prescribing anticoagulants to patients with an irregular heartbeat against official safety advice.

Protein may protect against heart attack

July 14, 2017
DDK3 could be used as a new therapy to stop the build-up of fatty material inside the arteries

Heart study finds faulty link between biomarkers and clinical outcomes

July 14, 2017
Surrogate endpoints (biomarkers), which are routinely used in clinical research to test new drugs, should not be trusted as the ultimate measure to approve new health interventions in cardiovascular medicine, according to ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.