Medicare/Medicaid policy shift didn't budge hospital infection rates: study

October 10, 2012 by Alan Mozes, Healthday Reporter
Medicare/Medicaid policy shift didn't budge hospital infection rates: study
Researchers found rates started dropping before reimbursements for such infections were withdrawn.

(HealthDay)—A 2008 shift in Medicare/Medicaid policy that cut off reimbursements for costs related to preventable infections in hospitals did not improve infection rates, new research indicates.

The change, mandated by Congress, meant hospitals would no longer receive payments for the treatment of certain patient infections if they occurred after a patient was admitted for care.

The purpose of the new policy was to nudge hospitals into reining in the incidence of avoidable infections that included catheter-associated bloodstream and and ventilator-associated pneumonia.

But this new analysis, involving data collected from nearly 400 hospitals, revealed that a in such infections was actually under way well before the policy took effect.

"What we found basically was that infection rates have been steadily declining since 2006, but this financial penalty didn't actually add any benefit in terms of further reducing rates of infections," said study author Dr. Grace Lee, an associate professor with the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School in Boston "They were already going down both before and after the policy was implemented."

Lee and her colleagues discuss their findings in the Oct. 11 issue of the .

To gauge the impact of the policy change, the team sifted through the standardized surveillance records on in- that had been compiled by infection-control staff working at 400 acute care hospitals in 41 states. For the most part, the data covered the period from 2006 through 2011.

The result: The policy change appeared to have had no impact on the infections it was designed to target.

Why? The study authors suggested that a combination of factors, both positive and/or confusing, could be at play. On the one hand, they noted that other previous national and local efforts to bring down infection rates might have beat the new policy to the punch.

On the other hand, hospitals might have set out to implement more rigorous coding procedures once the policy took effect, such that more of an effort was made to better catch and log infections present at admission rather than catching them post-admission. If so, this could reflect the advent of improved administrative skills in hospitals, rather than better quality of care or patient safety.

Regardless of its true effect, Lee indicated that the new policy may have more broadly helped to keep the conversation about hospital infections front and center.

"National attention to prevention is an important thing in general," she said. "There's been a lot of attention paid to in hospitals, and it appears that all of these national, regional and local efforts [are] working. In terms of bringing increased attention to the issue, it's important in terms of getting hospital leadership attention."

"But no, in terms of actual patient outcomes, this particular penalty didn't improve the situation," Lee added.

Dr. Jeffrey Rothschild, an associate physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, suggested that the findings are not unexpected.

"This is a really difficult thing to study, because often the data and discharge coding concerning hospital infections doesn't actually reflect what's really happening," Rothschild said. "But we do know there has been gradual improvement underway for some time in most hospitals in trying to reduce these kinds of infections, with an improved use of checklists and other interventions that hospitals have adopted."

"I'm not really surprised that they didn't find that the policy had a noticeable impact," Rothschild added. "However, I think the policy is sensible, and I think it's reasonable to continue it as a policy measure because the [new] is the result of growing literature showing that there are too many -acquired infections that are often quite preventable. It sends the right message to hospitals that if they haven't started to work on this issue yet, there is an incentive for them to do so."

Explore further: Medicare penalty appears to drive hospital infection prevention efforts

More information: For more on hospital infections, visit the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Related Stories

Medicare penalty appears to drive hospital infection prevention efforts

May 1, 2012
The 2008 decision by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to cease additional reimbursement to hospitals for certain healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) has led to enhanced focus on infection prevention ...

Hospital-acquired UTIs rarely reported in data used to implement penalties

September 5, 2012
Aiming to cut expenses and improve care, a 2008 Medicare policy stopped paying hospitals extra to treat some preventable, hospital-acquired conditions – including urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients after bladder ...

Few hospitals aggressively combat catheter-associated urinary tract infections

December 8, 2011
Hospitals are working harder than ever to prevent hospital-acquired infections, but a nationwide survey shows few are aggressively combating the most common one – catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

Hospitals that cooperate on infection control fare better than hospitals acting alone

October 9, 2012
An individual hospital's infection control efforts have a ripple effect on the prevalence of a deadly and highly infectious bacterium in hospitals throughout its surrounding region, a multi-center research group led by the ...

Recommended for you

High-fat diet in pregnancy can cause mental health problems in offspring

July 21, 2017
A high-fat diet not only creates health problems for expectant mothers, but new research in an animal model suggests it alters the development of the brain and endocrine system of their offspring and has a long-term impact ...

To combat teen smoking, health experts recommend R ratings for movies that depict tobacco use

July 21, 2017
Public health experts have an unusual suggestion for reducing teen smoking: Give just about any movie that depicts tobacco use an automatic R rating.

Opioids and obesity, not 'despair deaths,' raising mortality rates for white Americans

July 20, 2017
Drug-related deaths among middle-aged white men increased more than 25-fold between 1980 and 2014, with the bulk of that spike occurring since the mid-1990s when addictive prescription opioids became broadly available, according ...

Aging Americans enjoy longer life, better health when avoiding three risky behaviors

July 20, 2017
We've heard it before from our doctors and other health experts: Keep your weight down, don't smoke and cut back on the alcohol if you want to live longer.

Parents have critical role in preventing teen drinking

July 20, 2017
Fewer teenagers are drinking alcohol but more needs to be done to curb the drinking habits of Australian school students, based on the findings of the latest study by Adelaide researchers.

Fresh fish oil lowers diabetes risk in rat offspring

July 19, 2017
Fresh fish oil given to overweight pregnant rats prevented their offspring from developing a major diabetes risk factor, Auckland researchers have found.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.