Standard criteria needed for spinal stenosis diagnosis

Standard criteria needed for spinal stenosis diagnosis
There is a need for a consensus on criteria to define and classify lumbar spinal stenosis, according to a review published in the April 15 issue of Spine.

(HealthDay)—There is a need for a consensus on criteria to define and classify lumbar spinal stenosis, according to a review published in the April 15 issue of Spine.

Evelien I.T. de Schepper, M.D., from Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, Netherlands, and colleagues conducted an updated comprehensive literature search for diagnostic studies on lumbar spinal stenosis, in which one or more diagnostic tests were evaluated with a reference standard and was reported or could be calculated.

The researchers found that 22 additional articles in addition to the 24 included in the previous review (2004) met the inclusion criteria. In total there were 20 articles concerning imaging tests, 11 articles evaluating electrodiagnostic tests, and 15 articles evaluating clinical tests. There was variation in estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of the tests. (MRI) was found to be the most promising imaging test for lumbar spinal stenosis. There was no superior accuracy for electrodiagnostic studies compared to MRI.

"There is a need for a consensus on criteria to define and classify lumbar ," the authors write. "At present, the most promising imaging test for is MRI, avoiding myelography because of its invasiveness and lack of superior accuracy."


Explore further

Tests ID'd for use in outcome assessment of spinal stenosis

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: Spine

Health News Copyright © 2013 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Standard criteria needed for spinal stenosis diagnosis (2013, April 28) retrieved 2 August 2021 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-04-standard-criteria-spinal-stenosis-diagnosis.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments