Cortical microcircuitry: Can we predict function from structure?

May 31, 2013 by John Hewitt report
Cortical microcircuitry: Can we predict function from structure?
A chandelier cell (red) innervates multiple axon initial segments (green) in mouse neocortex. Credit: Hiroki Taniguchi

(Medical Xpress)—Neuroscientists have sought to explain diseases like schizophrenia and autism in terms of abnormal development of cortical microcircuitry. Before leaping to high level functional conclusions from low level anatomy, it may be a good idea to ask what low level functions can even be inferred from structure. A new perspective paper in Science titled, " Neuronal Birth to Cortical Circuitry," takes stock of new techniques for tracing the development of some of the more colorful players on the cerebral roster. Chief among them are the enigmatic "chandelier cells" that can usurp control over the output of nearly all the pyramidal cells in their vicinity. Chandelier synapses are able to outcompete all comers to command the most highly coveted real estate in all the cortex—the axon initial segment. The ability to electrically patch onto targeted subtypes of developing cortical cells, while imaging the effects of their activity on the surrounding network now offers the opportunity to directly map microscale anatomy to function. Where sterile electron micrographs (EM) previously only hinted at the dynamic storm continually unfolding at every synapse, researchers might now begin to expand the limited notion of static cortical "circuits" under the enlightened understanding that development processes in the brain might slow down, but they never really end.

Chandelier cells are distinguished from other GABA-ergic by their unique "cartridge" synaptic arrays, and fast-spiking activity. Although attempts have been made to correlate patterns of spike activity with observables like mitochondrial size and distribution, definitive conclusions form EM images are impossible. In some cases, like the giant "Calyx of Held" synapse found in the , structure-function links are more obvious. The idea that such a large and excrescenced synapse is required to support sustained, fast and reliable for sound source localization in the auditory system, is easier to digest. To prove ideas like these, researchers can now use techniques that spatially and temporally label these unique components for study.

To visualize chandelier cells in particular, an inducible site-specific Cre recombinase can be used for genetic fate mapping of the homeobox gene Nkx. Chandelier cells are the latest-born interneurons that are derived from the Nkx-expressing progenitor family, and Nkx is required for their development. By crossing a particular kind of Cre-mice (Nkx2.1CreERT2) with other mice expressing a fluorescent fusion protein, it is possible to create an animal where only cells that originate from a certain region and time—like chandelier cells—can be targeted. These mice can be induced to express the indicator protein upon injection of an appropriate activating molecule, in this case tamoxifen. The "ER" in Nkx2.1CreERT2 stands for estrogen receptor, and the "T" presumably for tamoxifen.

The axon initial segment of a pyramidal neuron in layer 4 of the visual cortex of a 6 year old monkey. The axon initial segment is forming symmetric, inhibitory synapses, with three axon terminals. These axon terminals are from a chandelier cell. Credit: Dr. Alan Peters, Boston University School of Medicine

The Science perspective also describes other cases where specific neuron subtypes, like those that contain somatostatin (SST), can be targeted. Within the SST interneuron subgroup, layer 3 neuron subtypes specifically contacted pyramidal cell dendrites, while layer 4 subtypes synapsed onto fast-spiking interneurons. At some point, asserting increasingly fine-grained cerebral axioms, like the sometimes fuzzy imposition of layer specificity, can create a situation where there description, together with the exceptions, becomes so long that the actual full connectome might be seen as the more compact descriptor. Furthermore, many of these kinds of axioms continually change in development.

For example, it is well established that the ultimate effects of the transmitter GABA flip-flop during maturation between having an excitatory and an inhibitory influence. In chandelier cells, these effects have been observed physiologically. Researchers have suggested that such transmitters must do more than just toggle membrane potential up and down. Synapses at the initial segment are uniquely poised to control other aspects of neural function like, for example, axonal transport, or even initial reverse-propagating spikes. Evidence that reverse spiking in pyramidal cells during sleep has a critical role in cortical microcircuits was recently discovered by Douglass Field and his group at NIH.

One antidote to the unbounded proliferation of increasingly specific molecular axiom is to instead search for underlying principle. The focus of the Science perspective is on circuit development, with a critical emphasis placed on the successive timing of waves of migrating neurons. The idea that the different species of neurons, and other cells in the cortex, must occupy a particular niche that becomes available at the time they first at their destination is powerful. For example, one might ask, why do pyramidal cells adopted their particular morphology and deep-layer position?

It is difficult to get neurons to develop the same circuit structure in culture as they do in vivo. As with different species of tree, genetics obviously plays a huge role in the structures neurons adopt. One might be tempted to ask whether the fine-scale particulars of their branch patterns any more meaningful in reality than those of trees? In parts of the visual system like the retina there is ample evidence that it can and does. For the cortex, the concept is more difficult to support.

For the , a deep layer makes eminent sense if your large axon is going to project down to the white matter anyway, myelin notwithstanding. The long apical dendrite, and even the side-projecting dendrite structure then logically follow. Later arriving neurons then pluck down and branch according to where they can access nutrient ultimately from the capillaries that is has metabolized through the synaptic mill into the form they most desire. Through evolution the trend has been to expand pyramidal cell scope in terms of size and synapse number. The additional synaptic excitement garnered by these super-pyramidals has generally been tempered by shifting the typically cell-body specific inhibition further afield. This has often been accompanied by inflating the inhibitory synaptic influence into full-blown interneurons, replete with the flexibility therein.

These broadly painted strokes do not circumvent the need to obtain the full molecular picture, but rather compliment it. The migration of neurons in development sorts them, in effect, like proteins or DNA running down a gel. Along the way, molecular adhesion in the local environment, and internal stabilization of the underlying cytoskeleton are among the critical factors. Pacing advance on the molecular and structural end, with incite on the functional end through new techniques like those mentioned here will be critical for neuroscience going forward.

Explore further: Study solves birth and migration mysteries of cortex's powerful inhibitors, 'chandelier' cells

More information: The Spatial and Temporal Origin of Chandelier Cells in Mouse Neocortex, Science 4 January 2013: Vol. 339 no. 6115 pp. 70-74 DOI: 10.1126/science.1227622

Diverse γ-aminobutyric acid–releasing interneurons regulate the functional organization of cortical circuits and derive from multiple embryonic sources. It remains unclear to what extent embryonic origin influences interneuron specification and cortical integration because of difficulties in tracking defined cell types. Here, we followed the developmental trajectory of chandelier cells (ChCs), the most distinct interneurons that innervate the axon initial segment of pyramidal neurons and control action potential initiation. ChCs mainly derive from the ventral germinal zone of the lateral ventricle during late gestation and require the homeodomain protein Nkx2.1 for their specification. They migrate with stereotyped routes and schedule and achieve specific laminar distribution in the cortex. The developmental specification of this bona fide interneuron type likely contributes to the assembly of a cortical circuit motif.


Related Stories

Control of brain waves from the brain surface

June 15, 2012

Whether or not a neuron transmits an electrical impulse is a function of many factors. European research is using a heady mixture of techniques – molecular, microscopy and electrophysiological – to identify the ...

Mapping blank spots in the cheeseboard maze

March 22, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—During spatial learning, space is represented in the hippocampus through plastic changes in the connections between neurons. Jozsef Csicsvari and his collaborators investigate spatial learning in rats using ...

Newly understood circuits add finesse to nerve signals

May 27, 2013

(Medical Xpress)—An unusual kind of circuit fine-tunes the brain's control over movement and incoming sensory information, and without relying on conventional nerve pathways, according to a study published this week in ...

Recommended for you

Why the lights don't dim when we blink

January 19, 2017

Every few seconds, our eyelids automatically shutter and our eyeballs roll back in their sockets. So why doesn't blinking plunge us into intermittent darkness and light? New research led by the University of California, Berkeley, ...

Curb your immune enthusiasm

January 19, 2017

Normally when we think of viruses, from the common cold to HIV, we want to boost people's immunity to fight them. But for scientists who develop therapeutic viruses (to, for example, target cancer cells or correct gene deficiencies) ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jun 01, 2013
Maybe get people who speak english as a first language to fill in what you don't copy and paste in the future?

Or have somebody proof-read it before you publish it.
not rated yet Jun 01, 2013
Yea, there are a few typos, particularly in opening paragraph, thanks for pointing that out. As for content, there is no copy and paste, if you can't follow it, I recommend sticking to commenting in your space / physics articles.
not rated yet Jun 01, 2013
Nevertheless, like you, John, I share an unquenchable passion to answer this question conclusively from the standpoint of human hearing. My passion. My research.

To quote you:
"In some cases, like the giant "Calyx of Held" synapse found in the auditory system, structure-function links are more obvious. The idea that such a large and excrescenced synapse is required to support sustained, fast and reliable signal transmission for sound source localization in the auditory system, is easier to digest."

I support your recommendation.
I understand your report.

I find the "digestion" for hearing as "unpalatable" for vision, strange. The same brain and cells not representing similar mechanisms to process - although different - senses, vision and hearing, light and sound, burdens, cloaks and shrouds those tasks performed, already enshrined in complexity from models treating each sense separately. There are common denominators to all the senses. Sooner or later all to be unified.

not rated yet Jun 02, 2013
Beleg - thanks man, surely spikes are the universal currency on their own scale. No doubt they are locally translated into unique currencies for different cell types and perhaps senses, the extent of which, as you point out, we will soon understand. Certainly principles extracted from looking at synapses in one sensory system would apply to another while the meaning of the spikes only less directly.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.