Mandatory helmet laws decrease head injuries among cyclists of all ages, study finds

September 13, 2013 by Kate Toogood, University of Alberta
Mandatory helmet laws decrease head injuries among cyclists of all ages, study finds
UAlberta researchers found that head injuries among kids and adults dropped after helmet laws were introduced.

New research from the University of Alberta shows that bicycle helmet legislation is having the right kind of impact on head injuries.

Research from professors Donald Voaklander and Duncan Saunders and PhD candidate Mohammad Karkhaneh in the U of A's School of Public Health shows that mandatory helmet legislation decreases head injuries in multiple age groups.

For the study, recently published in the Journal of Accident Analysis and Prevention, the researchers scrutinized Alberta Health data on hospitalizations and emergency department visits before and after helmet legislation was introduced. They looked at data from February 1999 to March 2007 involving child, teen and adult cyclists. To control for general trends in , the researchers included data on pedestrian injuries.

"We found that the rate of head injuries for child cyclists for both hospitalizations and emergency department visits decreased significantly (by nine per cent and 30 per cent respectively), and head injuries in adolescents and adults decreased for hospitalizations (by 36 per cent and 24 per cent respectively)," said Voaklander.

"We found that the number of head injuries in emergency department visits increased marginally for adults after legislation was introduced, but that's probably attributable to the increased profile of and sensitivity to concussions in the past few years," he added.

"When an adult hits their head, they're more likely today to be concerned about concussions and get checked out, but less likely to be hospitalized."

Voaklander says this research is contrary to the results of other research—and to the views of helmet legislation critics who suggest enforcing helmet use doesn't reduce .

"The existing published research could reflect a cultural bias because it is published in journals from countries where the discussion on the importance of hasn't yet happened, and likely won't, given the "share the road" culture that exists between drivers and cyclists in these countries," he said. "It seems to be much safer to cycle in places such as Europe, so the need for people to wear helmets may not be as great."

According to Voaklander, critics (including bicycling groups in Edmonton) have argued that such laws actually contribute to obesity and global warming by deterring people from biking because they don't own a helmet or don't want to wear one. He adds that there is currently a lot of pressure on cities to add drop-off bike programs, allowing people to borrow and return bicycles at various locations throughout the city. According to advocates, these programs help combat obesity and reduce global warming, but Voaklander notes that the bikes available through these programs don't come with helmets. This results in a corporate interest in encouraging people to cycle, but not necessarily to cycle safely.

"The contention that people will cycle less if you make them wear helmets is unproven—in fact, cycling rates have gone up in Canada over the past few years," Voaklander explains. "Now, it seems that a public health intervention is being incorrectly blamed for causing other problems."

Voaklander says the research presents definitive evidence that helmets remain an important injury prevention strategy. He plans to conduct similar research in St. Albert, where a municipal law dictates that helmets must be worn by everyone, and compare the results with those from the rest of the province.

"In these situations, we need to put the desire for cycling-group membership or corporate investment aside and focus on the data. It's the data that will tell us what interventions are working and are helping people lead healthy, active lives."

Explore further: Benefit of cycle helmet laws to reduce head injuries still uncertain, new study claims

More information: … ii/S0001457513002261

Related Stories

Benefit of cycle helmet laws to reduce head injuries still uncertain, new study claims

May 14, 2013
The benefit of helmet legislation to reduce admissions to hospital for head injuries is "substantially uncertain," concludes a study published in BMJ today.

Researchers say helmet laws effective

April 22, 2011
(Medical Xpress) -- University of Alberta researchers have confirmed that helmet bylaws increase wearing rates among adults.

Bicycle helmets prevent fatal head injuries

October 15, 2012
Cyclists who died of a head injury were three times as likely to not be wearing a helmet compared with those who died of other injuries, according to a study in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

Cyclist's benefit from helmets clearly shown

May 6, 2013
Cyclists who don't wear a helmet are almost six times more likely to suffer a severe head injury than their helmeted counterparts, according University of Sydney research published in the latest issue of the Medical Journal ...

Combination of compulsory helmets plus provided cycleways halve the head-injury rate, study finds

October 3, 2012
(Medical Xpress)—The combined effect of making helmets compulsory for riders and providing cycleways and other infrastructure has reduced by about half the serious head-injuries associated with cycling in NSW over the past ...

Rate of bicycle-related fatalities significantly lower in states with helmet laws

May 23, 2013
Existing research shows that bicyclists who wear helmets have an 88 percent lower risk of brain injury, but researchers at Boston Children's Hospital found that simply having bicycle helmet laws in place showed a 20 percent ...

Recommended for you

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Teens likely to crave junk food after watching TV ads

January 15, 2018
Teenagers who watch more than three hours of commercial TV a day are more likely to eat hundreds of extra junk food snacks, according to a report by Cancer Research UK.

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

Your dishwasher is not as sterile as you think

January 13, 2018
(HealthDay)—Your dishwasher may get those plates spotless, but it is also probably teeming with bacteria and fungus, a new study suggests.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Sep 14, 2013
Does the study present data on number of cycling trips by the target age-group? An equally plausible hypothesis is that the drop in injuries was caused by a drop in cycling rates - this has been the case in Australia and New Zealand for example.
not rated yet Sep 14, 2013
With respect, this headline is not correct, and the research does not show a clear benefit from cycle helmets. What it shows is that there was a reduction in cyclists attending hospitals after helmet legislation was introduced, but, as the previous poste has already pointed out, without exposure data, the conclusions are not justified.

In every case which has been examined, of the effects of helmet legislation, the fall in the number of head injuries to cyclists is more than explained by the fall in the number of cyclists, so the risk goes up not down.

There are many examples of research showing massive benefits from cycle helmets, but in all of these, there are methodological shortcomings that make their conclusions untenable, and they have been disproved on peer review. The research showing no benefits is robust and has been proved so on peer review.

The only two proven effects of helmet laws are a fall in the number of cyclists and obscene profits for those selling helmets.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.