Scientists develop improved method to estimate calories

September 17, 2013 by Rosalie Marion Bliss, Agricultural Research Service
Calories in foods are often determined by a system developed at the turn of the 20th century by ARS chemist Wilbur O. Atwater, shown here. Credit: USDA

Mom was right. It's important to chew your food fully. Chewing begins the digestive process of liberating nutrients from their food matrix, and this release is necessary before nutrients are considered "bioaccessible." In addition, the physical form of a food affects its energy and nutrient availability, which is called "bioavailability." Nutrients must be released from a food—becoming bioaccessible—before they are bioavailable to a consumer.

But hard foods, like , for example, may not be fully chewed before they are swallowed. Within the last decade, several published studies have shown that when certain nuts are included in the diet, the amount of fat excreted in stools increases. In theory, this fat was not absorbed because digesting the nuts' cell walls was difficult, and that reduced the bioaccessibility of the fat within the nut.

Researchers at the Agricultural Research Service's Beltsville [Maryland] Human Nutrition Research Center (BHNRC) studied the caloric accessibility and availability of two different tree nuts, pistachios and almonds. They recognized that reduced fat accessibility could affect the available provided by a given food matrix. The goal was to study available energy from foods that require significant mechanical and enzymatic action to permit estimates of bioaccessible energy. To achieve that goal, the ARS researchers further developed the commonly used method for estimating the number of calories in the nuts studied.

Updating traditional methods

Most often, calories in foods are determined by a system developed by Wilbur O. Atwater at the turn of the 20th century. Atwater was a USDA-ARS at Beltsville and is known as the founder of nutrition as a science in the United States. The system he devised assigns a calorie value to each gram of protein, fat, and found in foods.

Protein and carbohydrates are estimated, on average, to provide 4 calories per gram, and fat is estimated to provide 9 calories per gram. These calorie values are known as the "Atwater Factors." Atwater derived these values by feeding a mixed diet, meaning several foods at once, to a small group of volunteers.

Recently, BHNRC physiologists David Baer and Janet Novotny expanded on the Atwater methods and arrived at a lower estimate than previously reported for the available calories from the two they studied. Their modified method is more accurate for estimating the amount of calories in hard foods. It should work well for other foods, too, the scientists say.

Close-up of ARS chemist William O. Atwater. Credit: USDA
A look at pistachios

Baer and Novotny first conducted a feeding study in humans to measure the caloric value of pistachios. In the USDA-ARS National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, whole pistachio nuts are reported as having 160 calories per 1-ounce serving. The researchers reasoned that if the fat from the nuts is generally less accessible (due to difficulty in digesting the nut's ) than fat from other foods, then nuts may not provide as many calories as previously thought.

The team fed 16 healthy adults pistachios at 3 different levels: none, 1.5 ounces per day, and 3 ounces per day, along with a background, or "base," nut-free diet. Each of the pistachio levels was fed for an 18-day-period. Urine and stool samples were collected and analyzed from all feeding periods.

For the study, Novotny, a mathematician and expert in digestive physiology, wrote a series of algebraic equations. These equations were used to evaluate data gathered from the biological samples, after they had been analyzed using traditional equipment called a "bomb calorimeter." The bomb calorimeter was used to measure calories in the foods that were fed to volunteers (energy in) and also to measure the same foods' excreted remains (energy out). This analysis enabled the team to measure the calories specifically supplied by the target food—pistachios—even though the nuts were consumed along with the base diet.

"A novel feature of our expanded method is the paired-diet approach, where the base diet always consisted of the same foods and composition, thus allowing us to tease out the caloric value of the single target food," says Novotny.

The researchers then compared the metabolizable energy of the nuts fed during each treatment period to the energy estimated by the Atwater Factors. The study suggests that the caloric value of has likely been overestimated by about 5 percent, because the fat from the nut wasn't completely absorbed by the intestinal tract.

"This fat is likely not absorbed well because the nut's cell walls are hard to break down, whether by chewing or by the action of the microbial enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract," says Novotny. "Because the cell walls are hard to break down, the fat from these nuts is not completely bioaccessible, as required before becoming bioavailable."

The study, which was published in the British Journal of Nutrition in 2011, was supported by USDA and Los Angeles-based Paramount Farms, Inc.

Study volunteers consumed nuts as part of a controlled diet to determine the true energy value of the nuts. ARS physiologist Janet Novotny (left) provides 42 grams of pistachios to study participant Susan Conroy as dietetic technician Kenneth Mroz checks the study food on her tray. Credit: Stephen Ausmus
Weighing in on almonds, too

Baer and Novotny conducted a similar human clinical trial in which they fed the volunteers three different levels of whole almonds as part of a carefully controlled diet for an 18-day period.

According to food labels, almonds provide 168 calories per 1-ounce serving, but the researchers found that the same serving actually provided 129 calories when computed by the modified method. This difference was due in large part to loss of undigested fat, protein, and carbohydrate in the stools, according to the authors.

The study showed that it is possible that the total number of available calories from certain whole nuts, and perhaps other similar foods, may be lower than originally estimated using the traditional specific Atwater Factors. The study, which was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2012, was supported by USDA and Almond Board of California.

"These studies point to a reason that a single caloric-value number, or energy density, based on assumed digestibility for all three macronutrients, particularly fats due to their higher number of calories per gram, is not totally appropriate for all foods," says BHNRC director John Milner.

"An Improved Method To Estimate Calories" was published in the September 2013 issue of Agricultural Research magazine.

Explore further: Primatologist argues for changes to caloric values listed on food labeling

More information:

Related Stories

Primatologist argues for changes to caloric values listed on food labeling

February 19, 2013
(Medical Xpress)—Richard Wrangham, a primatology professor at Harvard University, in a speech given to an audience at this year's American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting, advocated that changes be made ...

Chew more to retain more energy

July 16, 2013
Almonds may still be considered one of the highest energy food sources but it's not about how much you bite off, instead it's about how much you chew, according to a July 14 panel discussion at the 2013 Institute of Food ...

British Journal of Nutrition: Fat found in pistachios may not be readily absorbed by the body

July 6, 2011
A new study now appearing in the peer-reviewed British Journal of Nutrition, finds that fat in pistachios may not be completely absorbed by the body. The randomized controlled-feeding study, which is the first-of-its-kind ...

In-shell pistachios: The original 'slow food?'

July 15, 2011
Two studies published in the current on-line issue of the journal Appetite indicate that consuming in-shell pistachios is a weight-wise approach to healthy snacking, offering unique mindful eating benefits to help curb consumption ...

Recommended for you

Dietary fat is good? Dietary fat is bad? Coming to consensus

November 15, 2018
Which is better, a low-fat/high-carbohydrate diet or a high-fat/low-carbohydrate diet—or is it the type of fat that matters? In a new paper featured on the cover of Science magazine's special issue on nutrition, researchers ...

Why we shouldn't like coffee, but we do

November 15, 2018
Why do we like the bitter taste of coffee? Bitterness evolved as a natural warning system to protect the body from harmful substances. By evolutionary logic, we should want to spit it out.

Survey reveals how we use music as a possible sleep aid

November 14, 2018
Many individuals use music in the hope that it fights sleep difficulties, according to a study published November 14 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Tabitha Trahan of the University of Sheffield, UK, and colleagues. ...

Colder, darker climates increase alcohol consumption and liver disease

November 14, 2018
Where you live could influence how much you drink. According to new research from the University of Pittsburgh Division of Gastroenterology, people living in colder regions with less sunlight drink more alcohol than their ...

Want to cut down on your meds? Your pharmacist can help.

November 14, 2018
Pharmacists are pivotal in the process of deprescribing risky medications in seniors, leading many to stop taking unnecessary sleeping pills, anti-inflammatories and other drugs, a new Canadian study has found.

No accounting for these tastes: Artificial flavors a mystery

November 13, 2018
Six artificial flavors are being ordered out of the food supply in a dispute over their safety, but good luck to anyone who wants to know which cookies, candies or drinks they're in.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.