Fear of missing bowel cancer may be exposing patients to unnecessary risks, say experts

We cannot allow a collective fear of missing bowel cancer to risk unnecessary and harmful treatment of patients with non-cancerous lesions, argue experts in BMJ today.

Professor Geir Hoff and colleagues in Norway, argue that we need more evidence about the malignant potential of to be sure that the risks of removing them do not outweigh the benefits of screening.

Bowel cancer screening has increased the detection of benign polyps (fleshy growths on the lining of the colon or ). The most common polyps found during screening are and guidelines recommend that they are removed.

However, data show that less than 5% of adenomas develop into colorectal cancer, suggesting that 95% of procedures may be exposing patients to unnecessary risks.

This concern about malignancy has now been extended to sessile serrated polyps which, the authors warn, are "less understood than adenomas and are more risky to remove."

Yet current consensus guidelines advise doctors to remove sessile serrated polyps measuring more than 5mm in diameter. Patients with sessile serrated polyps also undergo repeat colonoscopy every 1-5 years (a procedure involving a long tube with a camera on the end that is inserted via the rectum).

"The risk is that by adopting consensus guidelines the medical profession misses out on the opportunity to learn about the natural course of sessile serrated polyps and try different management options," write Professor Hoff and his team.

With more polyps being detected as a result of screening, "we need to be able to quantify the gains and harms and share this information with screening participants," they add. "It is not enough simply to share a belief that we are doing good, partly motivated by fear of not doing enough."

They acknowledge that guidelines are needed, but say they "should not be allowed to impair essential research to determine the malignant potential and best management of sessile polyps."

The change in guidelines towards an aggressive intervention strategy for sessile serrated polyps "may tilt the balance against screening if the improvements in mortality and incidence of cannot be shown to outweigh the harms of intervention," they conclude.

This article is part of The BMJ's Too Much Medicine campaign to help tackle the threat to health and the waste of money caused by unnecessary care.

More information: www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.f5843

Journal information: British Medical Journal (BMJ)
Citation: Fear of missing bowel cancer may be exposing patients to unnecessary risks, say experts (2013, October 8) retrieved 25 February 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-bowel-cancer-exposing-patients-unnecessary.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Estimating the risk of bowel cancer


Feedback to editors