Nutritionists target sugar, poor-quality carbohydrates

March 19, 2014 by Edward Mason, Harvard University
"Many consumers have no idea how much sugar and salt is in their food," said Professor JoAnn Manson (from left), who believes the new food labels will pressure food manufacturers to address the issue. Joining Manson for the HSPH forum discussion “Sugar, Salt, and Supplements: Sorting the Science” were Associate Professor Dariush Mozaffarian and Professor Frank Hu. Credit: The Forum at Harvard School of Public Health

The United States is simply too sweet for its own good.

Even the "healthy" fruit drinks that Americans sip are packed with the amount of in six cookies. That love affair is making us sick.

"There's no question we consume too much sugar," said Frank Hu, a professor of nutrition and at the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH). "It is not only bad for your teeth, it's associated with increased risk of diabetes, hypertension, and is bad for your heart."

Hu spoke at the HSPH panel "Sugar, Salt, and Supplements: Sorting the Science" on Monday, just weeks after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced its first overhaul of food-product labels in 20 years. The revamped labels will provide consumers with nutrition facts, calorie counts in boldface type, and realistic serving sizes. They also will also disclose how much sugar manufacturers add to their products, all with an eye toward helping the public make healthier eating choices.

The World Health Organization proposes reducing the daily sugar dose from 10 percent of calories to 5, the equivalent of eight teaspoons. Hu called it a "very ambitious but achievable goal."

Hu, who is also a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School (HMS) and Channing Lab at Brigham and Women's Hospital, pointed to the health consequences of failing to act. Centers for Disease Control studies show that people who get more than 10 percent of their daily calories from products with added sugar had a 40 percent increased risk of dying of heart disease, Hu said.

Panelist Dariush Mozaffarian '06, an associate professor in epidemiology at HSPH, warned that the dietary focus should also be on targeting "poor-quality carbohydrates" such as refined grains, potatoes, and sugar.

"Fifty percent of our calories come from poor-quality carbohydrates," said Mozaffarian, an associate professor in cardiovascular medicine at HMS and Brigham and Women's Hospital. "Mary Poppins said a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down. There's a lot of good, healthy, whole-grain products with a little bit of added sugar … If we just use sugars (to gauge a product), we could get misled."

Hu said the new labeling system would be a relatively easy way to count empty calories in sugar, compared with the more complicate tracking of refined starch in foods such as bagels and potatoes.  He also supports government programs like ones that ban sales of sugary drinks or large sodas.

"They increase awareness about this major problem," Hu said. "There is no magic bullet."

Panelist JoAnn Manson '75, professor in epidemiology at HSPH and chief of preventive medicine at the Brigham, said the new food labels will prove critical to pressuring food manufacturers to reduce the levels of added sugar and salt.

"When consumers are making choices, it's so important to have something that's easily visible and can see differences," said Manson. "That will put pressure [on companies] to develop foods with lower sugars and sodium. They'll go with other options. Many consumers have no idea how much sugar and salt is in their food."

The panel, presented in collaboration with the Huffington Post and moderated by its senior editor for health news, Amanda Chan, also addressed the latest scientific data on salt intake.

Mozaffarian called overuse of salt a "global health problem." He said current guidelines range as high as 4 grams of sodium per day, but should be closer 1.5 to 2 grams. Sodium is injected into processed foods such as bread and meat so they stay fresh, he said. "All that can be reduced," Mozaffarian added. "The government needs to do something."

Some Americans try to make up for their bad eating habits by taking multivitamins and supplements like fish oil. Manson said everyone needs vitamin D, and the recommended adult guideline is 800 IUs (international units) with calcium for bone health. But the jury is still out on whether greater amounts might prevent cancer and cardiovascular disease. Testing is being done on doses of 2,000 IUs daily, she added. Still, Manson said the "jury is still out" as to whether many supplements are safe and effective.

"There will never be a replacement for a healthy, well-balanced diet," Manson said.

Explore further: "Sugar is the new tobacco," says expert

Related Stories

"Sugar is the new tobacco," says expert

January 9, 2014
Professor Simon Capewell, from the University of Liverpool's Institute of Psychology, Health and Society is part of a campaign, `Action on Sugar', aimed at reducing the amount of added sugar in food and soft drinks to help ...

WHO: 5 percent of calories should be from sugar

March 5, 2014
Just try sugar-coating this: The World Health Organization says your daily sugar intake should be just 5 percent of your total calories—half of what the agency previously recommended, according to new draft guidelines published ...

Study examines consumption of added sugar, death for cardiovascular disease

February 3, 2014
Many U.S. adults consume more added sugar (added in processing or preparing of foods, not naturally occurring as in fruits and fruit juices) than expert panels recommend for a healthy diet, and consumption of added sugar ...

Recommended levels of sugar halved

March 7, 2014
The World Health Organisation (WHO) has halved its recommended levels of sugar intake, thanks to a study carried out by Newcastle University academics.

New food labels would highlight calories and sugar

February 27, 2014
(AP)—Those "Nutrition Facts" labels on nearly every food package in grocery stores are getting a new look.

Foods identified as 'whole grain' not always healthy

January 10, 2013
Current standards for classifying foods as "whole grain" are inconsistent and, in some cases, misleading, according to a new study by Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) researchers. One of the most widely used industry ...

Recommended for you

Women run faster after taking newly developed supplement, study finds

January 19, 2018
A new study found that women who took a specially prepared blend of minerals and nutrients for a month saw their 3-mile run times drop by almost a minute.

Americans are getting more sleep

January 19, 2018
Although more than one in three Americans still don't get enough sleep, a new analysis shows first signs of success in the fight for more shut eye. According to data from 181,335 respondents aged 15 and older who participated ...

Wine is good for you—to a point

January 18, 2018
The Mediterranean diet has become synonymous with healthy eating, but there's one thing in it that stands out: It's cool to drink wine.

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.