Researchers study differences in the prevalence of headaches worldwide

April 24, 2014, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Researchers around the world are working in a joint effort to create an international research tool for understanding and combating headaches. Led by researchers from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, the group has developed a new questionnaire designed to provide comparable results across nations and cultures.

"There are huge differences in the prevalence of worldwide, but we don't know if this is due to genetic, cultural or economic differences," says Lars Jacob Stovner, head of the Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches at St. Olavs Hospital and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in Trondheim.

Researchers need results that are as exact and comparable as possible to answer questions about the prevalence of headaches and their causes. This has proven to be difficult, however.

Research results about headaches have been collected from all over the world. But because the questions vary or they are asked in different ways, the results are not comparable. Also, the results must be interpreted in the context of each country. Researchers have now addressed this issue with the publication of a questionnaire in the Journal of Headache and Pain.

"The purpose of this project was to develop a standardized and better approach than what is currently used," says Dr Timothy J. Steiner at Imperial College in London. He is also a professor at the Department of Neuroscience at NTNU.

Patients answer questions about their family situation, health, perception of the quality of life and a variety of other matters. The answers are designed so that researchers can compare results regardless of the countries surveyed.

Common social problem

Headaches affect people everywhere. In addition to causing severe pain for some sufferers, they represent an economic burden. Headaches can lead to reduced work capacity, work absenteeism, a reduced ability to study and a variety of other effects that have consequences for society.

Migraine alone is probably the seventh most common cause of disability, according to the latest figures in the WHO report "Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2010 study", where Stovner and Steiner provided data for the section on headaches. The GBD 2010 results were recenlty presented in a whole issue of the renowned medical research magazine the Lancet.

The project is part of a global campaign against headaches, led by the non-profit foundation "Lifting the Burden", which has an official connection to the World Health Organization (WHO).

Culturally neutral is impossible

The purpose has been to develop approaches that provide results that are as comparable as possible.

But Steiner says it is impossible to create a completely culturally neutral method for evaluating headache prevalence.

There is simply too much variation between the conditions in countries such as Norway and Ethiopia.

If you ask someone in Norway if they have been absent from work because of headaches, you will probably get far more yes answers than in Ethiopia.

"As one colleague put it: If you have to plow the fields, then you have to plow the fields," says Steiner.

In Norway, you get paid sick leave if you are away from work, which means the threshold for staying at home is low. In Ethiopia, you go to work in the fields because you have to.

But the researchers have come a long way in their efforts to make the procedure as uniform and culturally neutral as possible. Thus they are likely to get far more comparable results than using other methods.

A question is not a question

The way you ask a question is also crucial. If you ask a Norwegian whether headaches have affected family planning, this would be perceived as a more or less voluntary choice. But the same question might be perceived differently if asked in a country where female fetuses might be aborted for cultural reasons, or in a country where contraception is not allowed.

Thus the new questionnaire is supplemented by a series of recommended approaches to be used in the survey. There are many factors that have to be considered.

If you go canvassing and ask people directly how they feel, you may get completely different results than if you phone them. In some countries it is impossible to contact people by knocking on doors. When you use the phone, you only get in touch with people with phones and those who are able to answer them.

If you ask someone if they have a headache on a Saturday morning, you may get very different answers than on a normal working day. A phone survey in the morning in some countries may give you answers from the mothers who are staying at home, but you will not contact the men who are at work.

There are many factors to consider.

Learning process

The questionnaire and the recommended approaches are the result of reviewing many other surveys and available literature. While the researchers are very experienced, there has been a lot of trial and error. In 2011 they held a 3-day conference in Trondheim with an international group of experts where they discussed the earlier versions of the questionnaire. They then developed an improved version.

"Representatives from all six regions of the World Health Organization have participated," says Stovner.

Steiner and Stovner have worked together on the project for ten years. They have projects in 30 countries that will continue for three to four years. "It has been a ," says Steiner.

The international tool will be used by all of the research groups involved, but the goal is for the questionnaire and the recommended approaches to be used throughout the world so that it is possible to obtain comparable results.

The questionnaire has been translated from English into a number of different languages, Urdu (for a study in Pakistan), Arabic (Saudi Arabia and Morocco) , Mandarin (China), Kannada (Southern India), Spanish (Spain, Peru and Guatemala), Amharic (Ethiopia), Tonga, Bemba and Nyanja (Zambia), Nepalese (Nepal), Russian (Russia), German (Germany and Austria), Lithuanian (Lithuania), Dutch (Netherlands), French (France) and Italian (Italy).

The answers will be useful for both specialists and epidemiologists, but most of all, for headache sufferers.

Explore further: Does more stress equal more headaches?

More information: "Diagnosis, prevalence estimation and burden measurement in population surveys of headache: presenting the HARDSHIP questionnaire." Timothy J. Steiner et al. Journal of Headache and Pain 2014, 15:3 DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-3

Related Stories

Does more stress equal more headaches?

February 19, 2014
A new study provides evidence for what many people who experience headache have long suspected—having more stress in your life leads to more headaches. The study released today will be presented at the American Academy ...

Study shows that high-blood pressure medicine also prevents migraines

January 13, 2014
Candesartan is just as effective as more the commonly prescribed propranolol when it comes to preventing migraine attacks, according to a new study from St. Olavs Hospital in Trondheim, Norway and the Norwegian University ...

Botox to treat 'suicide' headaches

November 1, 2013
"I hit myself in the head to distract myself from the pain when I have a cluster headache. The pain is indescribable hell, and in desperate moments, I have hit my head against a brick wall and hit myself in the head with ...

Study of Nepalese pilgrims challenges diagnosis of acute mountain sickness

January 9, 2014
A study led by University of British Columbia scientists calls into question a widely used method of diagnosing acute mountain sickness.

Alternative medicine often used by youth with headache

October 14, 2013
(HealthDay)—Youth with headache frequently use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), according to a study published online Oct. 14 in Pediatrics.

Recommended for you

Study ends debate over role of steroids in treating septic shock

January 19, 2018
The results from the largest ever study of septic shock could improve treatment for critically ill patients and save health systems worldwide hundreds of millions of dollars each year.

New approach could help curtail hospitalizations due to influenza infection

January 18, 2018
More than 700,000 Americans were hospitalized due to illnesses associated with the seasonal flu during the 2014-15 flu season, according to federal estimates. A radical new approach to vaccine development at UCLA may help ...

Zika virus damages placenta, which may explain malformed babies

January 18, 2018
Though the Zika virus is widely known for a recent outbreak that caused children to be born with microencephaly, or having a small head, and other malformations, scientists have struggled to explain how the virus affects ...

Certain flu virus mutations may compensate for fitness costs of other mutations

January 18, 2018
Seasonal flu viruses continually undergo mutations that help them evade the human immune system, but some of these mutations can reduce a virus's potency. According to new research published in PLOS Pathogens, certain mutations ...

Study reveals how MRSA infection compromises lymphatic function

January 17, 2018
Infections of the skin or other soft tissues with the hard-to-treat MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria appear to permanently compromise the lymphatic system, which is crucial to immune system function. ...

Fresh approach to tuberculosis vaccine offers better protection

January 17, 2018
A unique platform that resulted in a promising HIV vaccine has also led to a new, highly effective vaccine against tuberculosis that is moving toward testing in humans.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.