Technique change benefits limited to 'forefoot' runners

April 15, 2014 by Chris Thomas, Science Network WA
Rear foot runners who changed to front foot technique encountered more problems than front foot runners who changed to rear. Credit: Chuddlesworth

Runners beware—changing your technique from landing heel first (rearfoot strike) to the ball of your foot first (forefoot strike) may have adverse repercussions, according to research from the University of WA's School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health.

Published in Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise, the study found the change may not help avoid injury nor enhance performance as suggested by some elite athletes.

Biomechanics PhD candidate Sarah Stearne, one of the study authors, says when habitual rearfoot strike (RFS) runners ran with an imposed forefoot strike (FFS) technique, similar to habitual FFS runners, they absorbed more at their joint and less at their joint.

"But unlike habitual FFS runners, when habitual RFS runners used a FFS they did not lower their sideways knee force and the rotation force at the ankle increased," she says.

"The total positive lower limb mechanical work [sum of the ankle, knee and hip] increased by 17 per cent.

"This was caused by the muscles at the ankle and having to work harder to propel the runner off the ground and is likely the cause of the increase in energy cost."

But there was a difference when changing the technique the other way—when habitual FFS runners switched to an imposed RFS, they were able to almost exactly replicate the technique of a habitual RFS runner, meaning they absorbed more force at their knee joint and less at their ankle.

"The only aspect habitual FFS runners didn't replicate when using an imposed RFS were the high sideways knee forces that habitual rearfoot runners normally experience," Ms Stearne says.

"Additionally, when using an imposed RFS strike technique, runners had to produce 10.5 per cent less total positive lower limb propulsive work to maintain the same running speed."

Ms Stearne says it is unclear why changing one way (RFS to FFS) causes problems but the other way (FFS to RFS) creates an improvement.

"It could be because habitual FFS are more likely to use RFS occasionally, at really slow speeds and during walking, therefore their muscles are accustomed to this action so the change in technique is easier," she says.

"Or perhaps using a FFS technique enhances the spring-like function of the Achilles tendon due to the greater force absorption at the ankle and this is transferred across into RFS running."

"It should be noted the results of our study are only immediate changes—the athletes were given as long as they needed to get used to the imposed technique but it's possible some of the differences observed may dissipate with training."

The research was conducted using a force plate-instrumented treadmill and Vicon 3D motion analysis system. The impact forces collected from the treadmill were combined with 3D movement data to estimate the force acting at the ankle, knee and hip joints.

Explore further: Changing running technique could cause more harm than good

More information: "Joint Kinetics in Rearfoot versus Forefoot Running: Implications of Switching Technique." Stearne, Sarah M.; Alderson, Jacqueline A.; Green, Benjamin; Donnelly, Cyril J.; Rubenson, Jonas. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: POST ACCEPTANCE, 4 February 2014. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000254

Related Stories

Changing running technique could cause more harm than good

February 13, 2014
Changing your running technique from a rearfoot strike (landing on your heel first) to a forefoot strike (landing on the ball of your foot first) might not offer the performance and injury avoidance benefits that running ...

Cushioned heel running shoes may alter adolescent biomechanics, performance

March 19, 2013
Many of today's running shoes feature a heavy cushioned heel. New research presented today at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) found that these shoes may alter an adolescent runner's ...

No running for the well-heeled: Being down at heel could save your knees

October 28, 2013
If you often find yourself running after a bus, escaping a burning building or taking part in competitive athletics in high-heeled footwear, you may be storing up knee problems for later in life, according to a study published ...

Study looks at muscle adaptation of transition to minimalist running

May 2, 2013
For tens of thousands of years, humans ran on bare feet. Then we developed an assortment of specialized shoes, including – particularly since the 1960s – a seemingly limitless variety of running shoes. Despite the perceived ...

Recommended for you

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Teens likely to crave junk food after watching TV ads

January 15, 2018
Teenagers who watch more than three hours of commercial TV a day are more likely to eat hundreds of extra junk food snacks, according to a report by Cancer Research UK.

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

Your dishwasher is not as sterile as you think

January 13, 2018
(HealthDay)—Your dishwasher may get those plates spotless, but it is also probably teeming with bacteria and fungus, a new study suggests.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet May 15, 2014
It would be far better if the study had looked at people who transitioned from rear- to forefoot strike a few months ago rather than ones who have just barely started doing it. I did this transition myself (had to, I started wearing Vibrams) and it did indeed take awhile to build up the technique. You DO have to spend more energy, as it turns the calf muscles into shock absorbers, instead of letting the heels take all the load and transmit it up to the knee and hip joints. As the forefoot strikes, the calf engages enough to take the brunt of the impact, so that the heel takes little or no load.

I am able to run far longer using a forefoot strike. Using traditional stiff-soled athletic shoes (Nikes, Reeboks, etc.), I would get shin splints and become overly tired after about half a mile. With Vibrams, I have to spend more energy in my calves, but in return for this, I no longer have shin splints - or knee pain. The knee pain would always kill my ambitions to become a proper runner.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.