Live long and prosper? Decoupling lifespan and healthspan in aging research

January 26, 2015 by Stuart Mason Dambrot feature
Experimental design for measuring healthspan. A: Protocol for cross-sectional study. B. Different categories and assays used to quantify health. Credit: Bansal A, Zhu LJ, Yen K, Tissenbaum HA (2015) Uncoupling lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans longevity mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(3): E277-E286.

(Medical Xpress)—A long-standing assumption in aging research, and therefore in resulting antiaging interventions, is that modifying genetic and environmental factors to extend lifespan also increases healthspan – the length of time an organism is in optimal health. As it turns out, however, that assumption has escaped scientific scrutiny due largely to its apparent validity. Recently, scientists at University of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS) examined this assumption, and thereby the life-/healthspan relationship, by investigating multiple lifespan-modulating signaling pathways – mechanisms in which ligands (ions or molecules) bind to receptors, resulting in altered cellular responses – in the wild type and four long-lived mutants (insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1, dietary restriction, protein translation, and mitochondrial signaling) of the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, a species studied for over two decades in aging research. They found that all long-lived mutants spent a higher percentage of their extended lifespan in a frail, rather than healthy, state. The scientists therefore conclude that aging research must include additional factors beyond lifespan alone.

Dr. Heidi A. Tissenbaum discussed the paper that she, Dr. Ankita Bansal and their colleagues published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "C. elegans aging research has identified multiple pathways that have been shown to modulate lifespan," Tissenbaum tells Medical Xpress, This means that that there are individual genes that one can either increase or decrease in dosage, thereby leading to changes in the animal's lifespan – which, similar to humans, is measured in the number of days the animal lives. The researchers tested four mutants with mutations in the following genes, where each mutant displays an increased lifespan relative to wild type roundworms:

1. daf-2, the C. elegans insulin/IGF-1 receptor, where mutants show a doubling of lifespan

2. eat-2, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit routinely used as a genetic model of , with mutants showing a 33% increase in mean lifespan

3. clk-1, an enzyme necessary for biosynthesis of ubiquinone (a component of the electron transport chain required in aerobic cellular respiration, generating energy in the form of ATP), was the model for mitochondrial activity modulation, with mutants having a 25% increase in mean lifespan

4. ife-2, the gene encoding for the C. elegans eukaryotic initiation factor 4E, a principal regulator of protein synthesis, where mutants had a 40% increase in mean lifespan

The video will load shortly
daf-2 day 20. Video recording of daf-2 mutants in liquid media on day 20. Credit: Bansal A, Zhu LJ, Yen K, Tissenbaum HA (2015) Uncoupling lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans longevity mutants. Credit: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(3): E277-E286.


The video will load shortly
ife-2 day 20. Video recording of ife-2 mutants in liquid media on day 20. Credit: Bansal A, Zhu LJ, Yen K, Tissenbaum HA (2015) Uncoupling lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans longevity mutants. Credit: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(3): E277-E286.
To accurately assess the animals' health, the scientists divided lifespan into healthspan and gerospan, respectively defined as the period when the animal has greater than and less than 50% of the maximal functional capacity of wild type. Therefore, in their view a healthy long-lived mutant would show extended healthspan and compressed gerospan. "Using these terms, we analyzed all of our healthspan data chronologically, simply counting the number of days spent in healthspan versus gerospan for each mutant in each assay."

The main challenge the scientists encountered was how to define healthspan – for example, as healthy aging – and moreover, how to define healthspan in the laboratory using C. elegans. "We read the literature, had many lab discussions and came up with the experimental framework that we used in our manuscript," Tissenbaum recounts. "We reasoned that we wanted to model human health, so from the literature and discussions, we concluded that we had to model both frailty and the ability to maintain homeostasis" – that is, resistance to external stress. "Next, the main challenge in the multiple cellular and organismal assays we conducted was the large number of animals we needed for the assays and the time required to carry out all of the experiments."

Time, indeed: The experiments described in the paper were performed entirely by Dr. Bansal – and it took several years. "We also challenged ourselves, other lab members, and other UMMS faculty to determine how to best illustrate the data," Tissenbaum adds. "Even the figures in the paper are the result of many hours discussing how best to illustrate both the change in a health parameter as well as the lifespan analysis in the same figure." (Note that the paper's Acknowledgements section provides an extensive list of research technicians, graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, and faculty who contributed to these discussions.)

Movement capacity of aging worms: Muscle architecture of animals at Day 15. Phalloidin staining comparing Day 15 for wild type and the long-lived mutants. Wild type worm shows visible degradation at Day 15 (50%) of maximal lifespan (as indicated by the arrows). However, other long-lived mutants show degradation much earlier when normalized for their lifespan. Credit: Bansal A, Zhu LJ, Yen K, Tissenbaum HA (2015) Uncoupling lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans longevity mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(3): E277-E286.

Interestingly, Tissenbaum tells Medical Xpress, showing that lifespan and healthspan can be separated was not expected. "This was quite surprising for us. We'd assumed that lifespan and healthspan would be correlated based not only on our data that many of the long-lived mutants showed the ability to resist external stress, but also on the fact that many papers use the word healthspan with limited assays while vaguely defining what healthspan meant."

The same held true for all of the long-lived mutants extending the period of frailty. "This was also surprising," she continues. "Prior to our work, we thought that there could be some costs to lifespan extension given prior studies as well as evolutionary theories. However, we didn't think we'd see the effects that we observed when we analyzed the raw data. In fact, personally, it was a bit disappointing: a main aspect of my thesis work – in Dr. Gary Ruvkun's laboratory at Harvard University – was identifying and characterizing the daf-2 gene, which I really wanted to be the gene where mutants showed both lifespan and healthspan extension."

Tissenbaum notes that the key insights from the study arose from the scientists conducting a broad study where they tested multiple parameters of health as the animals aged, comparing the four long-lived mutant types to wild type in every assay as the animals aged. "Another novel aspect of our study was that we analyzed the animals up to 80% of their average lifespan – so if one strain lives an average of 20 days, we tested up to 16 days, while for daf-2, where the average is 45 days, we tested up to 36 days. Next, when we analyzed the data, we did it in two ways: first by simply looking at the number of healthy days versus frail, and then analyzing the data based on the average lifespan." For example, she illustrates, an analysis at 50% of the average life span would differ in the animals mentioned above – that is, 10 days versus 22.5 days.

In addition to the mouse studies mentioned in the paper, Tissenbaum notes that additional mammalian studies may be conducted. "We revealed new insights largely because we took the broad approach of testing multiple assays as the animals aged, as well as testing the animals late into their lifespan. Similar experiments where mammals are assayed late into life, with healthspan and gerospan being measured chronologically and physiologically, might be performed in the near future. Looking further ahead," she continues, "more extensive studies dissecting healthspan and in mammals would be exciting. The biggest challenge would be the cost of maintaining a large number of older animals. Of course, intensive studies in people would be a goal for future work but this would require first defining health, healthspan and parameters to test in people."

Moving forward, the scientists are interested in identifying genes and interventions that extend healthspan and compress gerospan. "We've set up a perfect system to test this, and are developing new methods to automate some of the assays." The researchers will be seeking additional funding to continue and expand their work – and also welcome collaborators.

While synthetic biology provides techniques for altering/synthesizing genes in order to modify expression into phenotype, Tissenbaum sees these areas as far removed from what the researchers do in their lab. "In thinking about our work, aging is a whole body process. Our statistical modeling shows no single equation could account for the decline in more than one health parameter, suggesting that the rates of decline are different and indicates that – in addition to hormonal crosstalk between tissues – there's probably tremendous tissue specificity in the aging process."

"Ultimately, all medical research is aimed at prolonging life – but we must strive to prolong healthy life. Therefore, our challenge remains defining health and the ability to test and quantify healthy living. For human studies," Tissenbaum concludes. "I believe studies involving extensive databases of family history through generations – such as the Framingham Heart Study and the Kuakini Hawaiian Lifespan Study – will be key."

Explore further: Could ibuprofen be an anti-aging medicine? Popular over-the counter drug extends lifespan in yeast, worms and flies

More information: Uncoupling lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans longevity mutants, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2015) 112(3):E277-E286, doi:10.1073/pnas.1412192112

Related Stories

Recommended for you

New insights on triggering muscle formation

April 26, 2017

Researchers at Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (SBP) have identified a previously unrecognized step in stem cell-mediated muscle regeneration. The study, published in Genes and Development, provides new ...

Risk of obesity influenced by changes in our genes

April 25, 2017

These changes, known as epigenetic modifications, control the activity of our genes without changing the actual DNA sequence. One of the main epigenetic modifications is DNA methylation, which plays a key role in embryonic ...

11 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

chookhouserules
1 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2015
Seriously! Don't you young egghead geniuses realize how painful, boring and disempowering old age is?! Why would I a 70 yo, active: arthritis + otherwise ill, mentally active, pain ridden man. Desire longer life into dementia + disempowered "waiting for God" home?! For 10 or more suffering, medically + human actors controlled years! Get real!
smd
4 / 5 (1) Jan 27, 2015
Seriously! Don't you young egghead geniuses realize how painful, boring and disempowering old age is?! Why would I a 70 yo, active: arthritis + otherwise ill, mentally active, pain ridden man. Desire longer life into dementia + disempowered "waiting for God" home?! For 10 or more suffering, medically + human actors controlled years! Get real!

Except, of course, that the researcher's statement in the closing paragraph - that is, "Ultimately, all medical research is aimed at prolonging life – but we must strive to prolong healthy life." (with the emphasis on "healthy") - is making your point for you, albeit in a far more productive manner.
chookhouserules
not rated yet Jan 27, 2015
[1] How does our planet's natural resource support an unheard of population acquired by these 150 year old science assisted geriatrics?! [2] Infrastructures: water, sewerage, power, medical/ hospitals, educational etc. Are already overworked/ under supplied + underfunded. [3] Taxpayer base is dwindling in western nations: the increased taxpayer funded social services 'machine' + all entailed will be stressed beyond economic endurance. Due to these unnatural, scientifically enhanced 'oldies'. These 'oldies' won't be paying payroll tax by the way! [4] Its medically established that with old age comes MORE disease, illness, injuries and hospitalization/ nursing home residence: NOT less. [5] Geriatrics are recognized as being LESS productive than in their pre geriatric years. [6] What you infer is less "productive" in my initial comments, may not be pc / acceptable to academics: reality bites folks! Reality: ECONOMICS rules in modern societies, taxpayer funded, how we roll!
smd
not rated yet Jan 27, 2015
How does our planet's natural resource support an unheard of population acquired by these 150 year old science assisted geriatrics?! ...Reality: ECONOMICS rules in modern societies, taxpayer funded, how we roll!

You are suffering from myopic temporal shortsightedness in assuming that present is prologue - that is, that today's age/health/medical status quo is permanent. Investigating the history of science and how assumptions about "how things are and will be" have repeatedly been proven incorrect might help with this all-too-common affliction.
chookhouserules
not rated yet Jan 28, 2015
Well, I'm sure tempted to reply in kind: refrained. Science, think tanks + folk attuned to our real world reality have created the "Doomsday Clock" based on their learned and experienced observation of our planet + its denizens. They've intelligently arrived at "how things are + will be" based on the track record of homosapiens; I feel more informed by them than you. You've made assumptions about a 'brave new world' I've chosen to disagree; its not rocket science!
smd
not rated yet Jan 28, 2015
Well, I'm sure tempted to reply in kind: refrained. Science, think tanks + folk attuned to our real world reality have created the "Doomsday Clock" based on their learned and experienced observation of our planet + its denizens. They've intelligently arrived at "how things are + will be" based on the track record of homosapiens; I feel more informed by them than you. You've made assumptions about a 'brave new world' I've chosen to disagree; its not rocket science!

Perhaps you don't understand that "based on the track record..." is exactly my point: You think not only that a future scenario is predictable by extrapolation, but specifically that your vision of the future is inevitable. This sounds like religious zealotry. Yes, the Doomsday Clock countdown is discouraging - but anyone who believes that his or her version of the future is cast in stone is, with all due respect, ignorant. This can and often does include scientists, who are not necessarily immune to cognitive bias.
chookhouserules
not rated yet Jan 29, 2015
Ergo: your "version of the future" according to your textual input is also "cast in stone." With "all due respect" : superfluous. So scientists disagreeing with your "cast in stone" viewpoint have "cognitive bias." Think about that!
smd
not rated yet Jan 29, 2015
Ergo: your "version of the future" according to your textual input is also "cast in stone." With "all due respect" : superfluous. So scientists disagreeing with your "cast in stone" viewpoint have "cognitive bias." Think about that!

Fine, you're a troll. Time to move on.
chookhouserules
not rated yet Jan 31, 2015
I'm not moving on! You're a typical/ stereotypical "troll" branding excuse: for avoiding intelligent input: move on, kitchen's too hot for likes of you!
smd
not rated yet Jan 31, 2015
You seem confused.

In a last attempt at clarity, the Doomsday Clock is not counting down...it's a symbolic probabilistic representation of "how close we are to destroying our civilization with dangerous technologies of our own making."

FYI, we've been closer to "midnight" in the past than we are today (http://thebulleti...meline).
chookhouserules
not rated yet Feb 01, 2015
Is it lonely: being you? Ah, when did I state "counting down?" When did I say its a REAL, actual physical clock? You've transferred your subjective prejudiced thought, misread + mistranslated my meaning. Its ok: you're forgiven! Seriously dude: interacting with you is very boring, a waste of my time + worse. The textual interaction has become circular; I've got a life: try that its rewarding. Words of advice from an oldie: READ everything BEFORE doing anything. Otherwise you'll continue making these type of errors. Now reply: I'll cease + desist: you can then have the last word + feel right + knowledgeable. Cheers!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.