Faced with decisions, humans may be wired to say, 'no'

Basal ganglia
Inside the basal ganglia (highlighted in pink), Go and No-Go signals compete with each other. A new computational model suggests that the No-Go signals have the edge. Credit: Gunnar Grah

We may cave in to peer pressure, marketing and persuasion, but faced with decisions, the default response programmed into our brains is to say "no", a recent study suggests. 

A new computational model based on data from rodent brains shows that "Go" and "No-Go" signals compete in the brain, originating from the nerve cells in the striatum – a part of brain that plays a crucial role in decision making, learning and various motor functions. But, the deck is stacked against the Go , which are expressed in D1 type dopamine receptors, says Arvind Kumar the senior author of the study and a researcher at the Department of Computational Biology at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm.

"It could be that humans are wired to be natural naysayers," Kumar says. The reason is that the D1 (Go) neurons and their rival D2 (No Go) neurons are projected in pathways within the striatum that inhibit each other. "However, it turns out that the No-Go pathway exerts more inhibition on the Go pathway than vice versa," he says.

"This inherent bias creates the decision transition threshold for the kind of input that is likely to change your preference," Kumar says. "One way to adjust the threshold is through learning. Another way is with neuromodulators like dopamine."

The bias in this threshold is due to an asymmetrical connection between the two circuits of neurons, in which the No Go pathway is stronger. Therefore, D1 neurons require slightly higher input. However, with this setting, D1 neurons can overcome the No Go pathway only when they receive weak inputs from the cerebral cortex that generates functions such as sensory perception, motor command, conscious thought and language. The switch between Go or No-Go decisions, depending on cortical input, gives rise to the decision transition threshold.

"This threshold where you are likely to switch your decision from Go to No Go, is created by unequal connectivity. If the connectivity were identical then such a threshold would not arise." says Jyotika Bahuguna, the lead author of the study and a joint PhD student at KTH and Bernstein Center Freiburg in Germany.

Kumar says the model, which he developed and tested with colleagues at the Bernstein Center Freiburg, at the University of Freiburg, sheds new light on cognitive problems associated with basal ganglia dysfunction, such as Parkinson's disease and Tourette's syndrome.

The paper, Existence and Control of Go/No-Go Decision Transition Threshold in the Striatum, was published on April 25 in the PLoS Computational Biology.


Explore further

Computer model explains how animals select actions with rewarding outcomes

Journal information: PLoS Computational Biology

Citation: Faced with decisions, humans may be wired to say, 'no' (2015, May 27) retrieved 10 December 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-05-decisions-humans-wired.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
125 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments