Study shows link between teen impatience and neural development in the brain

June 23, 2015 by Bob Yirka, Medical Xpress report
Credit: Jourden C/public domain

(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers with members from the U.S. and Germany has found a connection between neural development in one part of the brain and teen impatience. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the group describes experiments they conducted with volunteers and MRI machines and what they found by doing so.

Most everyone knows that teenagers are more impulsive than other , which most would agree is tied to impatience—and that of course can lead to trouble such as engaging in dangerous behavior. But is the behavior due to the lifestyle young people live, to their lack of or does it have something to do with their brains? To find out, the researchers enlisted the assistance of 50 pre-adolescent, adolescent and young adult volunteers. Each was asked a series of questions as they underwent MRI scans. The questions were geared towards highlighting impatience—the volunteers were asked which would they take, for example, a small monetary reward now, or a larger one later. Many variations on this theme were presented to allow for fine tuning the responses.

Analysis of the data revealed that the teenaged volunteers tended to go for the more immediate reward, though it depended, of course, on the size of each. But it also showed something else, the team reports—such decisions appeared to be based more on relative future orientation than on sensitivity to immediate rewards.

To find an explanation for the differences between the age groups, the researchers looked at the brain scans and found that as the children aged, impatience increased along with the number of nerve connections in a part of the brain called the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex—that they say appears to be a likely factor contributing to both impatience and impulsivity. It is only after the brain has had time to get used to the new neural network, along with more life experience, that people become more patient.

The researchers are hoping that research such as theirs might help to better understand other kinds of impatience or impulsivity, such as drug overuse or other risky behavior that continues in later life and then perhaps to find a way to help such people gain more control over their lives.

Explore further: Study suggests teen brain is more sensitive to rewards than adult brain

More information: Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity, Wouter van den Bos, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1423095112

Adolescence is a developmental period associated with an increase in impulsivity. Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct, and in this study we focus on one of the underlying components: impatience. Impatience can result from (i) disregard of future outcomes and/or (ii) oversensitivity to immediate rewards, but it is not known which of these evaluative processes underlie developmental changes. To distinguish between these two causes, we investigated developmental changes in the structural and functional connectivity of different frontostriatal tracts. We report that adolescents were more impatient on an intertemporal choice task and reported less future orientation, but not more present hedonism, than young adults. Developmental increases in structural connectivity strength in the right dorsolateral prefrontal tract were related to increased negative functional coupling with the striatum and an age-related decrease in discount rates. Our results suggest that mainly increased control, and the integration of future-oriented thought, drives the reduction in impatience across adolescence.

Press release

Related Stories

Study suggests teen brain is more sensitive to rewards than adult brain

January 14, 2014
(Medical Xpress)—Emily Barkley-Levensona and Adriana Galvána, psychology researchers at the University of California have conducted a study which indicates that teen brains, as suspected, truly are more sensitive to rewards ...

Study suggests region of prefrontal cortex impacted by ketamine

June 9, 2015
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers working at Yale University has found that a region of the brain's prefrontal cortex known as the infralimbic prefrontal cortex (IL-PFC) appears to be the part of the brain involved ...

This is your teen's brain behind the wheel

April 22, 2015
A new study of teenagers and their moms reveals how adolescent brains negotiate risk - and the factors that modulate their risk-taking behind the wheel.

Pitt expert talks about teenage brain development at AAAS Annual Meeting

February 14, 2015
Teenage exploration and risk taking could be explained by dramatic changes in the brain that allow elaborate planning and are driven by the need for immediate reward, according to a University of Pittsburgh neuroscientist ...

Researchers find brain network link between development, aging and brain disease

November 25, 2014
(Medical Xpress)—A team of bio-researchers with members from across Europe has found evidence that suggests that grey matter development early in life tends to be the first to regress later in life—related findings also ...

Experimenting preteens may have different brain processes

February 22, 2015
Preteens who experiment or explore new things may have brain processes that work differently than those of preteens who do not, according to a study released today that will be presented at the American Academy of Neurology's ...

Recommended for you

Brain activity linked to stress changes chemical codes

April 24, 2018
Five years ago, a team of University of California San Diego neurobiologists published surprising findings describing how rats' brain cells adopted new chemical codes when subjected to significant changes in natural light ...

In Huntington's disease, heart problems reflect broader effects of abnormal protein

April 24, 2018
Researchers investigating a key signaling protein in Huntington's disease describe deleterious effects on heart function, going beyond the disease's devastating neurological impact. By adjusting protein levels affecting an ...

Scientists develop new method that uses light to manage neuropathic pain in mice

April 24, 2018
For patients with neuropathic pain, a chronic condition affecting 7 to 8 percent of the European population, extreme pain and sensitivity are a daily reality. There is currently no effective treatment. Scientists from EMBL ...

Animal cyborg—behavioral control by activating 'toy craving' circuit

April 24, 2018
Children love to get toys from parents as presents. This craving for objects also underlies object hoarding disorders and shopping addiction. However, the biological causes of object pursuit have remained unknown. Part of ...

Heading—not collisions—cognitively impairs players

April 24, 2018
Worse cognitive function in soccer players stems mainly from frequent ball heading rather than unintentional head impacts due to collisions, researchers at Albert Einstein College of Medicine have found. The findings suggest ...

Imagined and actual movements are controlled by the brain in the same way

April 24, 2018
A new study from Karolinska Institutet in Sweden shows that imagined movements can change our perception in the same way as real, executed movements do. The research, which is presented in the scientific journal Nature Communications, ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Jun 23, 2015
Learning is the process of making mistakes as rapidly as possible. Teens do this instinctively.
not rated yet Jun 24, 2015
The 'now-later' test is often fatally flawed because of the extra variables introduced. For instance 'later' includes trust, anticipation of possible problems, experience with unreliability of promised reward verses the certainty and simplicity of 'now'.

In other words, 'now' is simple and uncomplicated. It is these variables which may be overwhelmingly more aversive than the delay alone.

To overcome these confounders the two intervals should include the same degree of real or perceived aversive conditions by making both in the future but one much further in the future eg tomorrow verses next week.

Done this way the difference between the two conditions is eliminated except for the delay and so the delay is properly tested.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.