Direct messaging not yet widely adopted by physicians

Direct messaging not yet widely adopted by physicians

(HealthDay)—Direct secure messaging (Direct), which is a standardized protocol for exchanging clinical messages and attachments, has not been widely adopted by physicians, despite its potential for improving care coordination, according to an article published in Medical Economics.

Despite government promotion of the protocol, there has been slow uptake of Direct. The latest electronic health record certification requires Direct messaging capability, but physicians who use Direct seem to be doing so mainly to meet meaningful use incentives.

According to the article, barriers to Direct include lack of education about the technology, costs, and technical difficulties such as only accepting messages that have attachments in a specific format. Physicians must have a Direct address to receive messages and the Direct address of their trading partners, but finding addresses can be challenging. Direct allows for fast and easy communication, but much of the communication already takes place via e-faxes, which are encrypted and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant. However, Direct messages are more secure and fall under the HIPAA security rule as well as the privacy rule. Secure texting via Direct allows easy communication with other specialists and follow-up of patients.

"The lesson of secure texting is that when a new technology is simple to use and meets an immediate need, will use it," according to the article. "Direct is nowhere near as intuitive and simple as regular e-mail or Facebook."

Explore further

Twitter expands privacy on direct messages

More information: Full Text
Journal information: Medical Economics

Copyright © 2015 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Direct messaging not yet widely adopted by physicians (2015, June 17) retrieved 25 February 2021 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments