Detecting more small cancers in screening mammography suggests overdiagnosis

July 6, 2015

Screening mammography was associated with increased diagnosis of small cancers in a study across U.S. counties but not with significant changes in breast cancer deaths or a decreased incidence of larger breast cancers, which researchers suggest may be the result of overdiagnosis, according to an article published online by JAMA Internal Medicine.

The goal of is to reduce breast cancer death by detecting and treating cancer early in the course of the disease. If detects tumors early, the diagnosis of smaller and more treatable cancers should increase, while the diagnosis of larger and less treatable cancers should decrease. However, there are increasing concerns that screening unintentionally leads to overdiagnosis by identifying small, indolent or regressive tumors that would not otherwise become clinically apparent.

Richard Wilson, D.Phil., of Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., and coauthors conducted an ecological study of 16 million women ages 40 and older who lived in 547 counties reporting to Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registries during the year 2000. Of these women, 53,207 were diagnosed with breast cancer that year and followed up for the next 10 years.

The authors examined the extent of screening in each county and measured breast cancer incidence in 2000 and incidence-based breast cancer death during the 10-year follow-up, with incidence and mortality calculated for each county.

The authors found that across counties there was a correlation between the extent of screening and breast cancer incidence but not with . An increase of 10 percentage points in the extent of screening was associated with 16 percent more breast cancer diagnoses but not significant change in breast cancer deaths.

More screening also was associated with increased incidence of small breast cancers of 2 centimeters or less but not with a decreased incidence of larger breast cancers, according to the results. An increase of 10 percentage points in screening was associated with a 25 percent increase in the incidence of small breast cancers and a 7 percent increase in the incidence of larger breast cancers.

"Across U.S. counties, the data show that the extent of screening mammography is indeed associated with an increased incidence of small cancers but not with decreased incidence of larger cancers or significant differences in mortality. ... What explains the observed data? The simplest explanation is widespread overdiagnosis, which increases the incidence of small cancers without changing mortality, and therefore matches every feature of the observed data," the authors conclude.

However, the authors note clinicians are correct to be wary of ecological studies because of ecological fallacy, which is making inferences about individuals from group data in statistical analyses because individuals may not possess those characteristics.

"As is the case with screening in general, the balance of benefits and harms is likely to be most favorable when screening is directed to those at high risk, provided neither too frequently nor too rarely, and sometimes followed by watchful waiting instead of immediate active treatment," the study concludes.

In a related commentary, Joann G. Elmore, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Washington, Seattle, and Ruth Etzioni, Ph.D., of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, write: "However, much has also been written about the caution needed when interpreting ecological analyses. It is well known, for example, that ecological studies provide no information as to whether the people who were actually exposed to the intervention were the same people who developed the disease, whether the exposure or the onset of disease came first, or whether there are other explanations for the observed association."

"We need clear communication and better tools to help women make informed decisions regarding screening mammography. ... Perhaps most important, we need to learn how to communicate with our patients about uncertainty and the limits of our scientific knowledge. In the end, we all need to become comfortable with informing women that we do not know the actual magnitude of overdiagnosis with precision. Part of informed decision making is providing all the information, even our uncertainty," the authors conclude."

Explore further: Public not being informed about dangers of medical overdiagnosis

More information: JAMA Intern Med. Published online July 6, 2015. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3043
JAMA Intern Med. Published online July 6, 2015. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3056

Related Stories

Public not being informed about dangers of medical overdiagnosis

May 20, 2015
A national survey reveals that only one in ten Australians report being told about the risk of overdiagnosis by their doctors, according to research published today in the scientific journal PLOS ONE.

Norwegian screening program has markedly reduced breast cancer mortality

June 15, 2015
Under the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme, all women aged 50 to 69 are invited for mammography screening every two years. The programme was launched as a pilot project in four counties in 1995/96 and went national ...

Agreement on best estimates of breast cancer overdiagnosis urgently needed to inform women

March 3, 2015
In 2012, prompted by increasing debate about overdiagnosis, an independent UK panel estimated that about 19% of breast cancers diagnosed among women invited to mammogram screening were in fact overdiagnosed (they would have ...

Some women still don't underststand 'overdiagnosis' risk in breast screening

August 28, 2014
A third of women who are given information about the chance of 'overdiagnosis' through the NHS breast screening programme may not fully understand the risks involved, according to research published in the British Journal ...

Annual screening does not cut breast cancer deaths, Canadian study suggests

February 11, 2014
Annual screening in women aged 40-59 does not reduce mortality from breast cancer beyond that of physical examination or usual care, concludes a 25-year study from Canada published in BMJ today.

New method detects more breast cancer in screening

May 6, 2015
Tomosynthesis detects 40% more breast cancers than traditional mammography does, according to a major screening study from Lund University, Sweden. This is the first large-scale study to compare the screening method with ...

Recommended for you

Breaking the genetic resistance of lung cancer and melanoma

July 25, 2017
Researchers from Monash University and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC, New York) have discovered why some cancers – particularly lung cancer and melanoma – are able to quickly develop deadly resistance ...

Anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agent inhibits glioblastoma growth and radiation resistance

July 24, 2017
Glioblastoma is a primary brain tumor with dismal survival rates, even after treatment with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. A small subpopulation of tumor cells—glioma stem cells—is responsible for glioblastoma's ...

New therapeutic approach for difficult-to-treat subtype of ovarian cancer identified

July 24, 2017
A potential new therapeutic strategy for a difficult-to-treat form of ovarian cancer has been discovered by Wistar scientists. The findings were published online in Nature Cell Biology.

Immune cells the missing ingredient in new bladder cancer treatment

July 24, 2017
New research offers a possible explanation for why a new type of cancer treatment hasn't been working as expected against bladder cancer.

No dye: Cancer patients' gray hair darkened on immune drugs

July 21, 2017
Cancer patients' gray hair unexpectedly turned youthfully dark while taking novel drugs, and it has doctors scratching their heads.

Shooting the achilles heel of nervous system cancers

July 20, 2017
Virtually all cancer treatments used today also damage normal cells, causing the toxic side effects associated with cancer treatment. A cooperative research team led by researchers at Dartmouth's Norris Cotton Cancer Center ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.