Support for research without prior consent in cases involving critically ill children

Support for research without prior consent in cases involving critically ill children

Public health experts at the University of Liverpool have shown that parents and medics support research without prior consent in the emergency treatment of critically ill children.

As children often lack the decision making ability or legal power to provide true informed consent for medical decisions, it often falls on parents or legal guardians to provide informed permission for medical decisions.

In the treatment of adults, would ask a patient to consent to receive therapy before providing it, or a clinical researcher may ask a research participant before enrolling that person into a clinical trial.  Consent is collected according to guidelines from the fields of medical ethics and research ethics.

Much needed research

The process of seeking informed consent for much needed research requires time, but this is severely constrained in emergency situations, such as acute resuscitation and critical care, where even minimal treatment delays are likely to be harmful.

In these situations parents are likely to be highly stressed and struggle to make informed decisions about research in the limited time available. Nevertheless, clinical trials are needed to find out whether critical care interventions are safe and can help to save children's lives.

Life-saving treatments

Many countries now permit variations to informed consent and allow progress in research to develop life-saving treatments. While the details vary, a common feature is that children are given a treatment as part of the trial and then a doctor or nurse will discuss the trial with parents when the emergency is over.

In 2008, UK legislation was introduced to enable doctors and nurses to seek consent for research after a child had been given the investigational drug or device in specific circumstances.

Conducting research without prior has been subject to much debate as there are concerns it limits personal choice. Little was known about the views and experiences of those with first-hand experience of this controversial consent process and how research without prior consent could be conducted in a way that was acceptable to families of very sick children.

First hand experiences

The Consent methods in children's emergency medicine and urgent Care Trials (CONNECT) study, which is the first of its kind in the UK, examined the views and experiences of those with first-hand experience of research being conducted without prior consent.

The study was led by Dr Kerry Woolfall from the Institute of Psychology Health and Society. More than 350 people took part, including 275 parents recruited to the Catheter Infections in Children Trial (CATCH).

Dr Woolfall, said: "The study found that although some parents were initially shocked that their child had been entered into a medical trial without their prior consent they were reassured once the reasons they were not consulted were explained to them at the appropriate time.

"Doctors, nurses and supported the use of deferred consent in CATCH and in future trials of interventions already used in clinical care.

"CONNECT provides evidence to support the use of research without prior consent in children's medicine; it also indicates the crucial importance of practitioner communication and appropriate timing of deferred consent discussions."

Explore further

Red tape for clinical trial consent can be lethal: Experts

More information: Kerry Woolfall et al. How parents and practitioners experience research without prior consent (deferred consent) for emergency research involving children with life threatening conditions: a mixed method study, BMJ Open (2015). DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008522

Further information is available on the CONNECT website: … ty/research/connect/

Journal information: BMJ Open

Citation: Support for research without prior consent in cases involving critically ill children (2015, October 23) retrieved 26 January 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors