Electrical brain stimulation could support stroke recovery

March 16, 2016
Increased fMRI activity and gray matter volume in stroke patients receiving motor rehabilitation plus anodal tDCS compared to motor rehabilitation plus sham treatment. Images are in radiological convention (R, right), and all lesions appear on the left of the image; yellow flash indicates the target for anodal tDCS. (A) Brain regions showing increases in fMRI activity during affected hand movement from baseline to immediately after intervention for the anodal tDCS group versus the sham treatment group. (B) Regions showing greater increases in movement-related fMRI activity for anodal tDCS versus sham group from baseline to 1-month follow-up. (C) Brain regions showing increases in gray matter density from baseline to immediately after intervention for the anodal tDCS group versus the sham treatment group. Credit: C. Allman et al., Science Translational Medicine (2016)

Applying an electric current to the brain can help recovery from stroke, Oxford University researchers have found.

A team from Oxford's Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, led by Professor Heidi Johansen-Berg and Dr Charlotte Stagg, studied the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to support rehabilitation . The technique involves placing electrodes on the scalp to pass a constant low current through a particular area of the brain.

In this case, the team used a variant called ipsilesional anodal tDCS, where a positive (anodal) current is applied on the side of the brain where damage has occurred. Anodal stimulation has previously been shown to increase the learning of in healthy people. The hope was that this effect could also be demonstrated in stroke patients, using tDCS to reinforce training that helps patients relearn how to use their body.

Professor Heidi Johansen-Berg said: 'For , longer and more intensive training leads to greater recovery. However, cost and staff availability limit what can be provided. That means that there is increasing interest in therapies that can be used to boost the effects of training.'

The study included twenty-four volunteers who had had a stroke affecting their hand and arm function, split into two groups. Both groups were given nine days of motor training. One group had tDCS during the training sessions, while the other group acted as a control: they were fitted with electrodes but did not receive tDCS.

Before, and at various times up to three months after the training, the volunteers' motor skills were assessed using established clinical measures to see how much they had improved.

Professor Johansen-Berg said: 'The assessments before the training were used to establish a baseline score for motor skills. Further assessments could then be used to determine what improvement there was above that baseline.

'Three months after training, the group that had received tDCS had improved more on our clinical measures than those in the control group. This showed that the patients who had received tDCS were better able to use their hands and arms for movements such as lifting, reaching and grasping objects.'

MRI scanning also showed that those who had had tDCS had more activity in the relevant brain areas for motor skills than the control group.

Study volunteer Jan said: 'The training was exhausting - like being in the gym every day, but it was huge fun. Even after the first session I felt as if I could do more, even though I was knackered. That made me go back every day, and I found it easier and easier. [The stimulation] didn't hurt - more like a mild tingle or a static electric shock right on the top of my head. The worst part was that my head itched afterwards!'

She added: 'I have definitely improved and benefited. People who haven't seen me say 'wow - you can move better now'. It definitely helped. I'm just sorry I can't continue with it. It was so nice to meet a team who had such positive attitudes and who told me it was not too late to improve.'

The research team conclude that there is positive evidence for the use of tDCS to aid stroke recovery but caution that the technique must be proved to have long term benefits not only in clinical measurements but also in the ability to carry out tasks important to daily life. Larger studies, they say, will be needed before this approach could enter routine clinical care.

Explore further: Learn how to fly a plane from expert-pilot brainwave patterns

More information: "Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke," DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5651

Related Stories

Electrical stimulation to the brain makes learning easier

September 21, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- A new study presented at the British Science Festival by Professor Heidi Johansen-Berg from the University of Oxford shows that the application of small electrical currents to specific parts of the brain ...

Electrocortical therapy may prevent motion sickness

September 9, 2015

(HealthDay)—A mild electrical current applied to the scalp—transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)—can prevent motion sickness, according to a study published online Sept. 4 in Neurology.

Electrical therapy offers promise for stroke patients

March 1, 2016

Patients experiencing communication problems after having a stroke could see long-term benefits from low-current electrical stimulation therapy, according to an international study led by The University of Queensland.

Recommended for you

Astrocytes found to keep time for brain, behavior

March 24, 2017

Until recently, work on biological clocks that dictate daily fluctuations in most body functions, including core body temperature and alertness, focused on neurons, those electrically excitable cells that are the divas of ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.