Intra-ocular pressure measurement in a patient with a thin, thick or abnormal cornea

As a fundamental component of the ocular examination, accurate measurement of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) facilitates the management of patients with established glaucoma and the identification of patients with an elevated risk of developing glaucoma. For over 70 years, the most common method of measuring IOP has been by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), largely on account of its low cost and ease of use.

As we understand corneal biomechanics better, we appreciate increasingly GAT's limitations. We overestimate IOP in thick corneas and underestimate it in thin corneas. Algorithms to correct for Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) to estimate IOP oversimplify the effects of corneal biomechanics: corneal thickness is but one component of a complex interaction between the viscous and elastic properties of the cornea, which in combination influence IOP measurements in unpredictable ways. This is especially so in patients with abnormal and/or surgically altered corneal biomechanics.

Newer methods of IOP estimation, including Dynamic Contour Tonometry and the Ocular Response Analyzer are alternative methods to measure IOP, particularly in with abnormal corneas.

While there is no single method which provides an easy, quick and accurate result in all cases, the practitioner must rely on well established methods informed by an understanding of their limitations. With ongoing research, new techniques promise to increase our understanding of the complex interplay between the cornea and potential inaccuracies in the measurement of IOP.

Explore further

British study may improve glaucoma assessment and treatment

More information: Colin I. Clement et al, Intra-Ocular Pressure Measurement in a Patient with a Thin, Thick or Abnormal Cornea, The Open Ophthalmology Journal (2016). DOI: 10.2174/1874364101610010035
Provided by Bentham Science Publishers
Citation: Intra-ocular pressure measurement in a patient with a thin, thick or abnormal cornea (2016, April 27) retrieved 10 July 2020 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments