Hospitals are less likely to admit publicly insured children, but outcomes aren't affected

January 10, 2017, Princeton University

Hospitals are less likely to admit children covered by public insurance such as Medicaid than privately insured children with similar symptoms, especially when hospitals beds are scarce. But the disparity doesn't appear to affect health outcomes, according to Princeton University researchers who analyzed information on tens of thousands of children who came to New Jersey emergency rooms between 2006 and 2012.

"In the end, I think we came to kind of a surprising conclusion that maybe the problem isn't that too few publicly insured children are being hospitalized," said Princeton economist Janet Currie . "Maybe the problem is that too many privately insured children are being hospitalized when they don't really need it."

The research was conducted by Currie, the Henry Putnam Professor of Economics and Public Affairs, chair of the Department of Economics, and co-director of the Center for Health and Wellbeing, and Diane Alexander, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago who earned her Ph.D. at Princeton.

Their article, titled "Are Publicly Insured Children Less Likely to Be Admitted to Hospital Than the Privately Insured (and Does it Matter)?", was published Dec. 9, 2016, by the journal Economics and Human Biology.

Currie, who has done extensive research on patients covered by Medicaid, said she was drawn to the project by the challenge of understanding whether hospitals treat people insured by Medicaid and SCHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) differently than people with private insurance. On average, hospitals receive lower payments for treating publicly insured children than privately insured ones.

To answer the question, Currie and Alexander examined records on all children between the ages of 3 months and 13 years who came to a New Jersey emergency room over seven years. The researchers recorded whether the child was admitted to the hospital and whether hospital beds were in high demand at the time because of local influenza outbreaks.

They found that publicly insured children were less likely to be admitted to the hospital overall, even when controlled for factors such as their diagnosis and characteristics of the hospitals. The disparity widened when hospital beds were scarce.

"That sounds kind of sinister, but we see absolutely no evidence it results in any increased return trips to the emergency room or that those who return are sicker," Currie said. "As far as we can see, yes, people are being turned away because they have , but there's no health consequence."

Why does the disparity in admission rates matter?

Unnecessary hospital admissions have important consequences, Currie said, including the risk of hospital-acquired infections and other complications, the cost of hospitalization, and the time children are away from school.

Anna Aizer, an associate professor of economics and public policy at Brown University who studies for the poor, pointed to the finding that privately insured children may be over-treated as especially significant.

"This is an important finding that is likely to spur more research examining whether similar patterns are evident in other contexts," Aizer said. "The results will likely have important implications for policymakers interested in understanding and addressing both rising and disparities in health."

Currie said the research is part of a larger project that is examining how health care is allocated in a range of situations, including heart attacks and cesarean sections.

"There are people who are getting things they don't need and then there are people who do need treatments but aren't getting them," Currie said. "So, in some sense, the procedures aren't being matched properly to the patients. If you kept the same amount of care and allocated it better, you could have better health outcomes for the same overall cost."

Explore further: Study examines financial losses for inpatient care of children with Medicaid

More information: Diane Alexander et al, Are publicly insured children less likely to be admitted to hospital than the privately insured (and does it matter)?, Economics & Human Biology (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2016.10.005

Related Stories

Study examines financial losses for inpatient care of children with Medicaid

September 12, 2016
Freestanding children's hospitals had the largest financial losses for pediatric inpatients covered by Medicaid, suggesting hospitals may be unlikely to offset decreased Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments from ...

Kids with Medicaid, CHIP get more preventive care than those with private insurance

November 16, 2015
Children insured by Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) were more likely to get preventive medical and dental care than privately insured children in a study that compared access and use of health care ...

Psychiatric emergency patients in Massachusetts wait longest for hospital beds

January 4, 2017
Patients having mental health emergencies who require hospital admission wait nearly four times longer for an inpatient bed than their medical counterparts and more than five times as long for transfer to another facility, ...

Children's oral health disparities persist despite equal dental care access

December 14, 2016
Oral health of children who receive dental care through Medicaid lags behind their privately insured peers, even though the children receive the same amount of dental care, according to a study from the Columbia University ...

Many kids with medicaid use ER as doctor's office: CDC

July 24, 2014
(HealthDay)—Children covered by Medicaid, the publicly funded insurance program for the poor, visit the emergency room for medical care far more often than uninsured or privately insured youngsters, a U.S. survey finds.

Medical service use down with deductibles in diabetes

December 16, 2016
(HealthDay)—Lower-income patients with diabetes and private insurance with a low (LD) or high deductible (HD) have reduced medical service use, according to a study published online Dec. 12 in Diabetes Care.

Recommended for you

Americans are getting more sleep

January 19, 2018
Although more than one in three Americans still don't get enough sleep, a new analysis shows first signs of success in the fight for more shut eye. According to data from 181,335 respondents aged 15 and older who participated ...

Wine is good for you—to a point

January 18, 2018
The Mediterranean diet has become synonymous with healthy eating, but there's one thing in it that stands out: It's cool to drink wine.

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...

Can muesli help against arthritis?

January 15, 2018
It is well known that healthy eating increases a general sense of wellbeing. Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) have now discovered that a fibre-rich diet can have a positive influence ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.