Muscular men less likely to support social and economic equality, study suggests

May 22, 2017 by Sarah Cox, Brunel University London
Credit: Brunel University

Physically stronger men are less in favour of social and economic equality than weaker men, new research from Brunel University London indicates.

Dr Michael Price and colleagues assessed 171 men aged 18-40, collecting information on height, weight, waist size, flexed and relaxed muscle circumference, hand grip, and arm and chest strength.

They also surveyed participants on how often they go to the gym, their , whether they support the redistribution of wealth, and whether they approve of the idea that some should have over others ('social dominance orientation').

As well as focusing on bodily signs of perceived dominance, the researchers also focused on facial appearance: they had groups of independent raters view participants' faces and rate whether they saw the men as dominant and attractive.

They also used software to analyse faces in terms of the masculinity of their shape.

Prior research has shown several aspects of face shape and appearance, such as height-to-width ratio, are linked to ability to compete for resources in the modern world.

The results showed a significant correlation between those with higher bodily formidability and the belief that some social groups should dominate others. These men were also much less likely to support redistribution of wealth.

But contrary to predictions, there was no correlation between being considered attractive, as measured by waist to chest ratio and various facial measures, and whether or not the men supported 'social dominance orientation' or redistribution.

The study showed that more muscular men were less egalitarian, and the number of hours actually spent in the gym was also linked to having less egalitarian socioeconomic beliefs.

Dr Price, Senior Lecturer in Psychology in the College of Health and Life Sciences at Brunel, explains:

"We believe that this link between perceived formidability and egalitarianism could be explained in a number of ways. It could be the result of men calibrating their egalitarianism to their own formidability. It could be the case that less egalitarian men strive harder to become muscular. Or there could be a third variable at play affecting both egalitarianism and muscularity.

"The causal direction here is somewhat ambiguous - does being muscular cause men to be less egalitarian, or are less-egalitarian men just more likely to lift weights?

"Our results suggest that wealthier men who are more formidable physically are more likely to oppose redistribution of wealth. Essentially, they seem more motivated to defend their resources. But less wealthy men who are still physically formidable don't seem more inclined to support redistribution either. They're not demanding a share of the wealth.

"A key question for future research might be whether certain personality traits, such as narcissism or a drive for dominance, might be related to both muscle-striving and inegalitarianism."

'Is sociopolitical egalitarianism related to bodily and facial formidability in men?' by Michael Price and Nicholas Pound (Brunel), Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington (LSE), and James Sidnaius (Harvard University) will be published in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior later this year and is available online now

Explore further: Feeling—not being—wealthy drives opposition to wealth redistribution

More information: Michael E. Price et al. Is sociopolitical egalitarianism related to bodily and facial formidability in men?, Evolution and Human Behavior (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.001

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Video games can change your brain

June 22, 2017

Scientists have collected and summarized studies looking at how video games can shape our brains and behavior. Research to date suggests that playing video games can change the brain regions responsible for attention and ...

Researchers discover brain inflammation in people with OCD

June 21, 2017

A new brain imaging study by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) shows for the first time that brain inflammation is significantly elevated - more than 30 per cent higher - in people with obsessive-compulsive ...

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

sirdumpalot
not rated yet May 22, 2017
Could all of this be to do with testosterone levels?
Gigel
not rated yet May 22, 2017
Is this about redistributing your own wealth or others' wealth?

What about a study of wealth redistribution supporters on their readiness to work?
Bob Osaka
not rated yet May 29, 2017
One wonders whether their genome was sequenced in search of the percentage of neanderthal DNA...minority or oppressed groups may provide a different conclusion...those in the perceived dominate group will always choose in favor of domination...those in a perceived subordinate group will most likely choose equality...
SKULLTRAP
not rated yet May 29, 2017
One wonders whether their genome was sequenced in search of the percentage of neanderthal DNA..."

Do you even lift bruh?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.