Experts call for ethics rules to protect privacy, free will, as brain implants advance

November 13, 2017 by Kim Martineau, Columbia University
brain
Credit: public domain

The convergence of artificial intelligence and brain-computer interfaces may soon restore sight to the blind, allow the paralyzed to move robotic limbs and cure any number of brain and nervous system disorders.

But without regulation, this flurry of innovation spells trouble for humanity, warns a team of researchers led by Columbia University neuroscientist Rafael Yuste and University of Washington bioethicist Sara Goering. In a new essay in Nature, Yuste and Goering join more than two dozen physicians, ethicists, neuroscientists, and computer scientists, in calling for ethical guidelines to cover the evolving use of computer hardware and software to enhance or restore human capabilities.

"We just want to ensure that this new technology which is so exciting, and which could revolutionize our lives, is used for the good of mankind," said Yuste, director of Columbia's Neurotechnology Center and a member of the Data Science Institute.

Long the stuff of science fiction, the melding of computers with the human mind to augment or restore is moving closer to reality. The authors estimate that the for-profit brain implant industry is now worth $100 million, led by Bryan Johnson's startup Kernel, and Elon Musk's Neuralink. Under President Obama's BRAIN Initiative alone, The U.S. government has spent another $500 million since 2013, they write.

As these investments bear fruit, the authors see four main threats: the loss of individual privacy, identity and autonomy, and the potential for social inequalities to widen, as corporations, governments, and hackers gain added power to exploit and manipulate people.

To protect privacy, the authors recommend that individuals be required to opt in, as organ donors do, to sharing their from their devices, and that the sale and commercial use of personal data be strictly regulated.

To protect autonomy and identity, the authors recommend that an international convention be created to define what actions would be prohibited, and to educate people about the possible effects on mood, personality and sense of self.

Finally, to address the potential for a brain-enhancement arms race pitting people with super-human intelligence and endurance against everyone else, they suggest creating culture-specific commissions to establish norms and regulations. They also recommend that military use of brain technologies be controlled, much as chemical and biological weapons are already under the Geneva Protocol.

In an earlier essay in the journal Cell, Yuste and Goering laid out similar arguments for integrating ethics into technologies, citing the 1970s Belmont Report which set ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects.

Explore further: Researchers want to heal the brain. Should they enhance it as well?

More information: Rafael Yuste et al, Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI, Nature (2017). DOI: 10.1038/551159a

Related Stories

Researchers want to heal the brain. Should they enhance it as well?

October 18, 2017
Despite obvious benefits for people with otherwise untreatable conditions, there could be downsides to brain-machine interfaces being developed to treat disease or drive prosthetic limbs. As researchers get better at building ...

Elon Musk's latest target: Brain-computer interfaces

March 29, 2017
Tech billionaire Elon Musk is announcing a new venture called Neuralink focused on linking brains to computers.

Who is responsible if a brain-controlled robot drops a baby?

June 29, 2017
As brain-controlled robots enter everyday life, an article published in Science states that now is the time to take action and put in place guidelines that ensure the safe and beneficial use of direct brain-machine interaction.

Researchers 'reprogram' network of brain cells in mice with thin beam of light

August 11, 2016
Neurons that fire together really do wire together, says a new study in Science, suggesting that the three-pound computer in our heads may be more malleable than we think.

Recommended for you

Use of electrical brain stimulation to foster creativity has sweeping implications

September 18, 2018
What is creativity, and can it be enhanced—safely—in a person who needs a boost of imagination? Georgetown experts debate the growing use of electrical devices that stimulate brain tissue, and conclude there is potential ...

The brain predicts words before they are pronounced

September 18, 2018
The brain is not only able to finish the sentences of others: A study by the Basque research centre BCBL has shown for the first time that it can also anticipate an auditory stimulus and determine the phonemes and specific ...

Engineers decode conversations in brain's motor cortex

September 18, 2018
How does your brain talk with your arm? The body doesn't use English, or any other spoken language. Biomedical engineers are developing methods for decoding the conversation, by analyzing electrical patterns in the motor ...

Circuit found for brain's statistical inference about motion

September 17, 2018
As the eye tracks a bird flying past, the muscles that pan the eyeballs to keep the target in focus set their pace not only on the speed they see, but also on a reasonable estimate of the speed they expect from having watched ...

Mouse study reveals that activity, not rest, speeds recovery after brain injury

September 17, 2018
When recovering from a brain injury, getting back in the swing of things may be more effective than a prolonged period of rest, according to a new Columbia study in mice. These findings offer a compelling example of the brain's ...

Opioid users could benefit from meth-relapse prevention strategy, study finds

September 17, 2018
New research raises the possibility that a wider group of people battling substance use disorders may benefit from a Scripps Research-developed relapse-prevention compound than previously thought.

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Spaced out Engineer
not rated yet Nov 13, 2017
Well they might want to hurry the fuck up, seeing as how there is unclassified documentation giving local gangsters to murder people for being "empowered" (http://www.soc.mi...2014.pdf
Noninvasive techniques have already been done with ultrasound, see the World Science Festival. I have not sleep good in 4 years so forgive my shortness. Oh, and I can measure it, so please explain away the evidence: https://imgur.com...ry/eRDW3
Spaced out Engineer
not rated yet Nov 13, 2017
I at least want and off switch to the Internet of things. I don't want to have to strap magnets to head, blast noise, have multiple grounding cords and use binuaral beats to try and beat a couple hundred million dollar project.
$50 and some proofs of complexity theory and information theory, I beat the sick fucks. $50. If God is just or there is karma, the ghetto of malnourished children devour these sick fucks in hell. I pray God is not just, though I don't know, but I do know there is no hell.
I still want these people put in solitary confinement for a year. Its been about 4 years of assault for me, one year of a fraction of the torment I have been put through is not even fair.
You know there is a problem when the "NSA" is concerned with their "agents". In other word like the DEA's drug slinging children, they are fucking with you, just to fuck with you, because they have access.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Nov 13, 2017
Regulation of something means nothing. An evil cabal will just figure a workaround.
I mean, just look at US efforts for gun control...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.