Experts call for ethics rules to protect privacy, free will, as brain implants advance

November 13, 2017 by Kim Martineau, Columbia University
brain
Credit: public domain

The convergence of artificial intelligence and brain-computer interfaces may soon restore sight to the blind, allow the paralyzed to move robotic limbs and cure any number of brain and nervous system disorders.

But without regulation, this flurry of innovation spells trouble for humanity, warns a team of researchers led by Columbia University neuroscientist Rafael Yuste and University of Washington bioethicist Sara Goering. In a new essay in Nature, Yuste and Goering join more than two dozen physicians, ethicists, neuroscientists, and computer scientists, in calling for ethical guidelines to cover the evolving use of computer hardware and software to enhance or restore human capabilities.

"We just want to ensure that this new technology which is so exciting, and which could revolutionize our lives, is used for the good of mankind," said Yuste, director of Columbia's Neurotechnology Center and a member of the Data Science Institute.

Long the stuff of science fiction, the melding of computers with the human mind to augment or restore is moving closer to reality. The authors estimate that the for-profit brain implant industry is now worth $100 million, led by Bryan Johnson's startup Kernel, and Elon Musk's Neuralink. Under President Obama's BRAIN Initiative alone, The U.S. government has spent another $500 million since 2013, they write.

As these investments bear fruit, the authors see four main threats: the loss of individual privacy, identity and autonomy, and the potential for social inequalities to widen, as corporations, governments, and hackers gain added power to exploit and manipulate people.

To protect privacy, the authors recommend that individuals be required to opt in, as organ donors do, to sharing their from their devices, and that the sale and commercial use of personal data be strictly regulated.

To protect autonomy and identity, the authors recommend that an international convention be created to define what actions would be prohibited, and to educate people about the possible effects on mood, personality and sense of self.

Finally, to address the potential for a brain-enhancement arms race pitting people with super-human intelligence and endurance against everyone else, they suggest creating culture-specific commissions to establish norms and regulations. They also recommend that military use of brain technologies be controlled, much as chemical and biological weapons are already under the Geneva Protocol.

In an earlier essay in the journal Cell, Yuste and Goering laid out similar arguments for integrating ethics into technologies, citing the 1970s Belmont Report which set ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects.

Explore further: Researchers want to heal the brain. Should they enhance it as well?

More information: Rafael Yuste et al, Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI, Nature (2017). DOI: 10.1038/551159a

Related Stories

Researchers want to heal the brain. Should they enhance it as well?

October 18, 2017
Despite obvious benefits for people with otherwise untreatable conditions, there could be downsides to brain-machine interfaces being developed to treat disease or drive prosthetic limbs. As researchers get better at building ...

Elon Musk's latest target: Brain-computer interfaces

March 29, 2017
Tech billionaire Elon Musk is announcing a new venture called Neuralink focused on linking brains to computers.

Who is responsible if a brain-controlled robot drops a baby?

June 29, 2017
As brain-controlled robots enter everyday life, an article published in Science states that now is the time to take action and put in place guidelines that ensure the safe and beneficial use of direct brain-machine interaction.

Researchers 'reprogram' network of brain cells in mice with thin beam of light

August 11, 2016
Neurons that fire together really do wire together, says a new study in Science, suggesting that the three-pound computer in our heads may be more malleable than we think.

Recommended for you

How returning to a prior context briefly heightens memory recall

December 11, 2018
Whether it's the pleasant experience of returning to one's childhood home over the holidays or the unease of revisiting a site that proved unpleasant, we often find that when we return to a context where an episode first ...

The importins of anxiety

December 11, 2018
According to some estimates, up to one in three people around the world may experience severe anxiety in their lifetime. In a study described today in Cell Reports, researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science have revealed ...

Neurons in the brain work as a team to guide movement of arms, hands

December 11, 2018
The apparent simplicity of picking up a cup of coffee or turning a doorknob belies the complex sequence of calculations and processes that the brain must undergo to identify the location of an item in space, move the arm ...

The richer the reward, the faster you'll likely move to reach it, study shows

December 11, 2018
If you are wondering how long you personally are willing to stand in line to buy that hot new holiday gift, scientists at Johns Hopkins Medicine say the answer may be found in the biological rules governing how animals typically ...

Study: Age, race differences determine risk of stroke in women and men

December 11, 2018
A new study found that, between the ages of 45 and 74 years, white women were less likely to have a stroke than white men, but at age 75 and older, there was no difference in stroke risk between white women and men. In contrast, ...

Using neurofeedback to prevent PTSD in soldiers

December 11, 2018
A team of researchers from Israel, the U.S. and the U.K. has found that using neurofeedback could prevent soldiers from experiencing PTSD after engaging in emotionally difficult situations. In their paper published in the ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Spaced out Engineer
not rated yet Nov 13, 2017
Well they might want to hurry the fuck up, seeing as how there is unclassified documentation giving local gangsters to murder people for being "empowered" (http://www.soc.mi...2014.pdf
Noninvasive techniques have already been done with ultrasound, see the World Science Festival. I have not sleep good in 4 years so forgive my shortness. Oh, and I can measure it, so please explain away the evidence: https://imgur.com...ry/eRDW3
Spaced out Engineer
not rated yet Nov 13, 2017
I at least want and off switch to the Internet of things. I don't want to have to strap magnets to head, blast noise, have multiple grounding cords and use binuaral beats to try and beat a couple hundred million dollar project.
$50 and some proofs of complexity theory and information theory, I beat the sick fucks. $50. If God is just or there is karma, the ghetto of malnourished children devour these sick fucks in hell. I pray God is not just, though I don't know, but I do know there is no hell.
I still want these people put in solitary confinement for a year. Its been about 4 years of assault for me, one year of a fraction of the torment I have been put through is not even fair.
You know there is a problem when the "NSA" is concerned with their "agents". In other word like the DEA's drug slinging children, they are fucking with you, just to fuck with you, because they have access.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Nov 13, 2017
Regulation of something means nothing. An evil cabal will just figure a workaround.
I mean, just look at US efforts for gun control...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.