Guidelines for fluoride intake—are they appropriate?

The appropriate use of fluoride has transformed oral health over the past 70 years, in part due to the guidelines created for fluoride intake. Recently, researchers are questioning these longstanding guidelines which served as advisory recommendations for decades. This issue of Advances in Dental Research, an e-Supplement to the Journal of Dental Research (JDR), presents the proceedings of a symposium at the 95th General Session of IADR in San Francisco, USA and includes reviews that critically examine the current guidelines for fluoride intake.

Since the benefits of in drinking water were first recognized, it has been accepted that fluoride is ingested and that remains the basis for automatic delivery. However, sources of ingested fluoride have changed and in parallel the prevalence and severity of and dental fluorosis have changed, leading to the idea that it is time to re-visit guidance on fluoride intake. Optimum fluoride intake should balance the prevention of dental caries with minimizing the occurrence of undesirable dental fluorosis.

"Guidelines for fluoride intake were first proposed when water was the only important source of fluoride. Now, there is a variety of ways of delivering fluoride and it was time to review these guidelines, considering current knowledge of the balance of benefit and risk," said guest editor Andrew Rugg-Gunn, Newcastle University, UK and the Borrow Foundation. "Experts from around the world gave reassurance that the current optimum range of fluoride intake is soundly based and that there is good evidence for raising the of fluoride intake. With the increase in the use of fluoride for preventing caries in adults, different guidance should be given for fluoride intake in adults compared with infants and young children."

"While changes to current guidance on adequate intake and upper limit of fluoride intake have not been settled, it was agreed that there are strong grounds for reconsidering current guidelines," said IADR President Angus William G. Walls, University of Edinburgh, who also contributed to this issue. "Further research and international discussion is needed to answer the question posed by the title of this symposium."

Importantly, the symposium prioritized the following research gaps:

  • What level of is acceptable to populations globally given the benefit of caries reduction?
  • What is the best method for measuring total fluoride intake and exposure?
  •  What is the best way to estimate total fluoride intake in children from birth to 3 to 4 y of age exposed to fluoridated or nonfluoridated water or fluoridated salt?
  • What is the best method to evaluate the patterns of of children across different zones with different outdoor air temperatures?
  • Do we need periodical analyses of fluoride concentrations in infant formula, bottled water, and infant foods?
  • Do we need to validate biomarkers of exposure to fluoride?
  • What is the effect of different types of exercise on the metabolism of fluoride?
  • What is the relationship between gene polymorphisms and enamel fluorosis?
  • What is the relationship between malnutrition and enamel fluorosis?
  • Is supplementation with calcium helpful to reduce enamel fluorosis?
  • What are the pre-eruptive effects of fluoride on caries progression into dentin?
  • What is the efficacy of low-fluoride toothpastes whose formulations have been modified to increase the anticaries efficacy?

These reviews, as well as summary of the discussion during the symposium, are included in this issue of Advances in Dental Research, an e-supplement to the Journal of Dental Research.


Explore further

Study discounts fluoride as a danger for tea drinkers

Journal information: Journal of Dental Research

Provided by International & American Associations for Dental Research
Citation: Guidelines for fluoride intake—are they appropriate? (2018, February 20) retrieved 16 September 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-02-guidelines-fluoride-intakeare.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
15 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 21, 2018
Modern science indicates that ingesting fluoride is ineffective at reducing tooth decay and is harmful to health. Countries without water or salt fluoridation often have citizens with better dental health than that found in the US. After 73 years of fluoridation, 63 years of fluoridated toothpaste, a glut of fluoridated dental products both over-the-counter and at the dentists' offices (and in higher concentrations and applied earlier and more often than ever), it's no surprise that fluoride overdose (dental fluorosis or discolored teeth) has gone up 600% since fluoridation began and is more severe. But what is super surprising is that in 2000 the Surgeon General declared that poor dental health was an epidemic. This was re-in forced fifteen years later by Senator Bernie Sanders who issued a report detailing the dental health crises facing millions of Americans today.

Americans are fluoride-overdosed and dentist deficient. Break the dentist monopoly. Legalize Dental Therapists.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more