Dose-escalated radn does not up survival in localized prostate CA

Dose-escalated radn does not up survival in localized prostate CA

(HealthDay)—Dose escalation from 70.2 to 79.2 Gy is not associated with improved overall survival (OS) in intermediate-risk prostate cancer, according to a study published online March 15 in JAMA Oncology.

Jeff M. Michalski, M.D., from Washington University in St. Louis, and colleagues randomized 1,532 men with stage cT1b to T2b, Gleason score 2 to 6, and (PSA) level of ≥10 and <20 or Gleason score of 7 and PSA <15 to 79.2 Gy radiation therapy in 44 fractions or 70.2 Gy in 39 fractions.

The researchers observed no difference in OS for the 751 men in the 79.2-Gy arm and the 748 men in the 70.2-Gy arm, with a median follow-up of 8.4 years. The eight-year rates of OS were 76 and 75 percent with 79.2 and 70.2 Gy, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.20; P = 0.98). The eight-year cumulative rates of distant metastases were 4 and 6 percent for the 79.2- and 70.2-Gy arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.01; P = 0.05). The ASTRO and Phoenix biochemical failure rates at five and eight years were significantly higher with 70.2 than 79.2 Gy. The rate of salvage therapy use was lower in the high-dose arm.

"Despite improvements in biochemical failure and distant metastases, dose escalation did not improve OS," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Explore further

Higher doses of radiation don't improve survival in prostate cancer

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: JAMA Oncology

Copyright © 2018 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Dose-escalated radn does not up survival in localized prostate CA (2018, March 16) retrieved 22 January 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors