Screening tool improves prediction of developing dementia

dementia
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

In people with a minor decline on the Mini-Mental-State-Examination—a widely used but limited test to screen for cognitive defects—follow-up with a simple visual screening tool can help identify those at increased risk for dementia.

As part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial, researchers in the Netherlands analyzed the MMSE of 2690 older adult patients at baseline and two-year follow-up.

The Visual Association Test, consisting of six cue cards and six target cards showing an unexpected visual association, was also analyzed at the two-year follow-up.

A decline in MMSE scores of two points and three points were associated with an increased risk of developing of 10 percent and 21 percent respectively, significantly higher than the overall risk of developing dementia.

Groups with imperfect VAT scores (?5 out of six) had substantially higher percentages of incident dementia.

An imperfect VAT increased the predictive value of two and three point decreases on the MMSE from 10 percent to 14 percent and from 21 percent to 29 percent respectively.

Given the importance of timely diagnosis of dementia, the authors suggest that the VAT may help identify older persons who need further cognitive examination, especially those with a minor decline in MMSE score.

More information: Susan Jongstra et al. Improving Prediction of Dementia in Primary Care, The Annals of Family Medicine (2018). DOI: 10.1370/afm.2224

Journal information: Annals of Family Medicine
Citation: Screening tool improves prediction of developing dementia (2018, May 14) retrieved 26 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-05-screening-tool-dementia.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Memory scores limited as Alzheimer's screening tool

4 shares

Feedback to editors