Everything big data claims to know about you could be wrong

Everything big data claims to know about you could be wrong
o understand human health and behavior, it’s better to study individuals, not groups, new study finds (Image from Alex Prager movie Face in the Crowd).

When it comes to understanding what makes people tick—and get sick—medical science has long assumed that the bigger the sample of human subjects, the better. But new research led by UC Berkeley suggests this big-data approach may be wildly off the mark.

That's largely because emotions, behavior and physiology vary markedly from one person to the next and one moment to the next. So averaging out data collected from a large group of human subjects at a given instant offers only a snapshot, and a fuzzy one at that, researchers said.

The findings, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal, have implications for everything from mining social media data to customizing health therapies, and could change the way researchers and clinicians analyze, diagnose and treat mental and physical disorders.

"If you want to know what individuals feel or how they become sick, you have to conduct research on individuals, not on groups," said study lead author Aaron Fisher, an assistant professor of psychology at UC Berkeley. "Diseases, mental disorders, emotions, and behaviors are expressed within individual people, over time. A snapshot of many people at one moment in time can't capture these phenomena."

Moreover, the consequences of continuing to rely on group data in the medical, social and behavioral sciences include misdiagnoses, prescribing the wrong treatments and generally perpetuating scientific theory and experimentation that is not properly calibrated to the differences between individuals, Fisher said.

That said, a fix is within reach: "People shouldn't necessarily lose faith in medical or social science," he said. "Instead, they should see the potential to conduct scientific studies as a part of routine care. This is how we can truly personalize medicine."

Plus, he noted, "modern technologies allow us to collect many observations per person relatively easily, and modern computing makes the analysis of these data possible in ways that were not possible in the past."

Fisher and fellow researchers at Drexel University in Philadelphia and the University of Groningen in the Netherlands used statistical models to compare data collected on hundreds of people, including healthy individuals and those with disorders ranging from depression and anxiety to and panic disorder.

In six separate studies they analyzed data via online and smartphone self-report surveys, as well as electrocardiogram tests to measure heart rates. The results consistently showed that what's true for the group is not necessarily true for the individual.

For example, a group analysis of people with depression found that they worry a great deal. But when the same analysis was applied to each individual in that group, researchers discovered wide variations that ranged from zero worrying to agonizing well above the group average.

Moreover, in looking at the correlation between fear and avoidance – a common association in group research – they found that for many individuals, fear did not cause them to avoid certain activities, or vice versa.

"Fisher's findings clearly imply that capturing a person's own processes as they fluctuate over time may get us far closer to individualized treatment," said UC Berkeley psychologist Stephen Hinshaw, an expert in psychopathology and faculty member of the department's clinical science program.


Explore further

Analysis finds schizophrenics have thinner cerebral cortex, on average

More information: Aaron J. Fisher et al. Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2018). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711978115
Citation: Everything big data claims to know about you could be wrong (2018, June 19) retrieved 25 April 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-06-big-wrong.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
78 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 19, 2018
Obviously, the worlds for profit mega-corporations want us all to fit into nice and neat little categories that they can exploit for more gains. Just wait until your health insurance company demands that your doctor doesn't use a cancer treatment on you -- because of what your data says even though your file is far from accurate by either their cost saving measures, hacking, or simple file corruption -- and they use another treatment that kills you instead. Those days are almost here folks.

Jun 19, 2018
I wonder if that is why half the people I know that use drugs to get their blood pressure down to "normal" feel like crap whenever their BP falls below 140/80.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more