Does putting the brakes on outrage bottle up social change?

October 23, 2018, Pennsylvania State University
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

While outrage is often generally considered a hurdle in the path to civil discourse, a team of psychologists suggest outrage—specifically, moral outrage—may have beneficial outcomes, such as inspiring people to take part in long-term collective action.

In a literature review, the team, led by two Penn State moral psychologists, combined findings from the fields of moral psychology and intergroup psychology to investigate the dynamics of outrage, which they define as anger at the violation of one's own moral standards.

In moral psychology, outrage is generally considered a negative emotion that leads to, at worst, an escalation of the conflict, or, at best, virtue signaling and slacktivism, according to Victoria L. Spring, a doctoral candidate in psychology, Penn State. However, she added these studies often focus on the immediate of outrage, unlike studies in intergroup psychology, which often suggest that outrage can lead to long-term positive effects through collective action.

"Some intergroup psychologists, who are psychologists who study group relations, conflict and conflict resolution, as well as some sociologists, have proposed that anger, if it is effectively communicated, can be leveraged into collective, social action," said Spring. "Anger can then serve as a signal that a specific transgression is broadly considered to be unjust by one's peers."

For example, the researchers, who present their analysis in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, currently online, cite a study that showed women who read that the majority of men have hostile sexist beliefs exhibit anger, which also predicted intentions to join for equal salaries. Women who showed anger at the sexist beliefs were also were more likely to actually participate in political action later.

The researchers also said that more research should be done on the cumulative, long-term effect of expressing moral outrage, not just the immediate aftermath of an interpersonal exchange, said C. Daryl Cameron, assistant professor of psychology, Penn State and research associate in the Rock Ethics Institute.

"By drawing on the intergroup relations literature, we're suggesting that there is actually a lot of work in this other area of psychology suggesting that outrage can get you to care, can get you motivated to sign petitions, can get you to volunteer, things which have outcomes that are much longer term than signaling," said Cameron.

In social media, for example, the researchers cite another study showing that people who express outrage at racist or sexist comments by piling on angry comments on the perpetrator, are often judged more negatively.

"Yes, studies do seem to show negative effects of viral blaming for the blamer, nevertheless, we have seen cases where viral blaming has led to positive change over time," said Cameron. "So, even if there are negative short-term effects for the blamers or the blamed, there could still be long-term effects where you have a pro-social action."

Spring also said that the idea that labeling any emotion as exclusively good, or exclusively bad, may lead to problems in creating social change. She added that rhetoric promoting only empathy, which is often described as a positive emotion, could have long-term negative effects on motivation to effect change.

"We've noticed a conflict in popular discourse that people often pit outrage and empathy against each other," said Spring. "However, people may leverage empathy norms to suppress outrage. This can be particularly damaging if the is being expressed by a marginalized group."

The researchers said that future studies should be conducted using this perspective that unites the moral and intergroup fields.

"We want to present a more integrated approach," said Spring. "We think the downsides of outrage have been thoroughly discussed, so we want to present some potential upsides of outrage that we may have not paid as much attention to."

Explore further: Moral outrage may influence jurors' emotions in age of video

More information: Victoria L. Spring et al, The Upside of Outrage, Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.006

Related Stories

Moral outrage may influence jurors' emotions in age of video

December 3, 2013
Think about the last time you were morally outraged. Chances are you felt angry, but did you also feel disgust?

Study finds participants feel moral outrage toward those who decide to not have children

March 1, 2017
Data representing individuals from across the United States indicates that U.S. adults are increasingly delaying the decision to have children or forgoing parenthood entirely. Yet evidence suggests that voluntarily child-free ...

Disgust is way of communicating moral rather than self-interested motivation

December 19, 2016
New research carried out by psychologists at the University of Kent has shown for the first time that a decision to express disgust or anger depends on the motives a person seeks to communicate.

Recommended for you

Typically human: Babies recognize nested structures similar to our grammar

November 21, 2018
At a mere five months of age, babies seemingly have the ability to recognize very complex grammatical structures. That is what a research team headed by Professor Angela Friederici from the Max Planck Institute for Human ...

Classroom friendships may offset effects of punitive parents

November 21, 2018
Angry, threatening and highly critical parenting is more likely to result in children with defiant, noncompliant and revengeful behavior that spills over to adulthood and impacts relationships with all authority figures.

Psychotic experiences could be caused by trauma in childhood

November 21, 2018
Researchers at the University of Bristol have established greater evidence for a causal link between trauma in childhood and psychotic experiences at 18 years old.

Neuroimaging study reveals 'hot spot' for cue-reactivity in substance-dependent population

November 20, 2018
When patients with dependence on alcohol, cocaine or nicotine are shown drug cues, or images related to the substance, an area of their brain known as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) shows increased activity, report investigators ...

Being fair: The benefits of early child education

November 20, 2018
Children from low-income families who got intensive education early in life treat others with high levels of fairness in midlife, more than 40 years later, even when being fair comes at a high personal cost, according to ...

Does Netflix's '13 Reasons Why' influence teen suicide? Survey asks at-risk youths

November 20, 2018
A significant proportion of suicidal teens treated in a psychiatric emergency department said that watching the Netflix series "13 Reasons Why" had increased their suicide risk, a University of Michigan study finds.

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Anonym518498
2.3 / 5 (4) Oct 23, 2018
what else would you expect a bunch of nut job 'psychologists' to conclude? Fits perfectly with the stalinist agenda
coahoma3
2.3 / 5 (4) Oct 23, 2018
This is so irresponsible. They are, perhaps unintentionally, advocating violence, which is the Democrats wide open secret. They deny they agree with the ways of Antifa and others but then do nothing to stop it. These are obviously your typical left wing academics who are trying to make the Democrats violent protests look acceptable. Very irresponsible.
LaPortaMA
5 / 5 (2) Oct 23, 2018
Most do not know how to master their own thinking or to channel their energies. And this article does not help.

Isn't this a doctoral thesis?
RobertKarlStonjek
5 / 5 (1) Oct 23, 2018
In a literature review, the team, led by two Penn State moral psychologists, combined findings from the fields of moral psychology and intergroup psychology to investigate the dynamics of outrage, which they define as anger at the violation of one's own moral standards.


This is a contextual definition with respect to the investigating discipline and not a definition of outrage per se. In fact what they have defined is what we could call 'Moral Outrage'.

What other kinds of outrage could their be? Using 'violation' as the common identifier we have violation of the body, of one's property/territory/possessions, of one's beliefs, of one's affiliations and so on. All and any of these can provoke outrage and not just one's moral standards. We see outrage in non-human animals and this is more commonly the result of territorial invasion, incursion or threat.
idjyit
5 / 5 (1) Oct 23, 2018
"How to program yourself or others using emotional triggers instead of logic and reason"

People should be learning to control their emotions and use them properly to advance their life.

Emotions are an entirely illogical motivator , if used unwisely they will destroy your life and probably the lives of people around you.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.