Initiative can cut gender gap in medical school faculty salaries

Initiative can cut gender gap in medical school faculty salaries

(HealthDay)—An institutional gender equity initiative (GEI) can reduce gender-based salary gaps among medical school faculty, according to a study published online Dec. 21 in JAMA Network Open.

Avani D. Rao, M.D., from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland, and colleagues characterized in salary and examined the outcomes associated with a GEI. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and promotion data were retrospectively reviewed in a quality improvement study with simulations of salary and additional accumulated wealth (AAW). All academic faculty were included from 2005 and 2016 (1,481 and 1,885, respectively).

The researchers found that a decade after GEI implementation, in 2016, the overall mean salary gap by gender decreased from −2.6 to −1.9 percent. Male faculty collected an average lifetime AAW of $501,416 more than equivalent women in the simulation of pre-GEI disparities; these disparities persisted past retirement. In the real-time GEI simulation, the AAW gap decreased to $210,829; the gap decreased to $66,104 using post-GEI conditions.

"Importantly, our analyses display the positive impact of an institutional commitment to eliminating inequities," the authors write. "These data highlight that outcomes of directed change are not seen immediately; therefore, institutions without GEI in place should implement similar efforts promptly to prevent further delays in progress toward ."

Two authors disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical and technology industries.

Explore further

AMA adopts policy to advance gender equity in medicine

More information: Abstract/Full Text
Journal information: JAMA Network Open

Copyright © 2018 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Initiative can cut gender gap in medical school faculty salaries (2018, December 27) retrieved 10 August 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors