Patient symptom and quality of life assessments must be inclusive and equitable

Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Information reported directly by patients can be invaluable for assessing the impact of disease and treatment on patients' symptoms and quality of life -but more needs to be done to include under-served groups to avoid rising inequalities in healthcare, say experts at the University of Birmingham.

The information is commonly collected in both clinical trials and and ensures that the patient's perspective is at the heart of decision making. As use of these data become more commonplace, however, researchers in the University's Center for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research are calling for more to be done to ensure such information can be provided by everybody.

In an article published today 5 May 2022 in Nature Medicine, researchers in collaboration with , regulators and international experts identify some of the barriers to participation such as access to technology, disability, language and cultural requirements and call for these to be addressed.

Lead author, Professor Melanie Calvert, said: "When we start to embrace new approaches to healthcare, such as use of patient-reported outcomes, we need to make sure that barriers to participation are addressed at an early stage. If we don't do this, the gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged populations will only get worse.

"Representative diversity in is vital to ensure new medicines and technologies are applicable to the population they are intended to serve. Targeted initiatives are needed to ensure that no groups are excluded from participation in patient-reported outcome , both in research settings and routine clinical care."

Specific recommendations in the article include:

  • Improve diversity by involving individuals who represent target populations when designing patient questionnaires.
  • Consider the type and severity of disease when seeking patient views, including cognitive or functional impairment that would limit participation.
  • Be aware of cultural needs or languages that might be a barrier, and address these sensitively and appropriately.
  • Include individuals with all levels of reading, writing and problem solving abilities by ensuring material is accessible and that assistance is available, if required.
  • Provide alternative methods of participation to promote digital inclusion
  • Where information is being used in , make sure inclusivity is included early on in discussions about data collection.

Rav Verdi, a patient partner who co-authored the work, said: "As a patient and living in a cosmopolitan society it's encouraging to see that all walks of life have been considered and a means of communication thought about to glean information from the patient and to provide information to the patient regarding their care and treatment. As world-wide issue, could be shared with treatment centers to provide better care and understanding of different groups of the population."

Roger Wilson, a patient partner adds: "Listening to patients reveals the range of diversity which must be understood and allowed for by careful design if a study is to offer benefits to society equitably."

Professor Calvert adds: "Patient-reported outcome measures and data collection must be reflective of diverse and multicultural societies, to improve research and promote equitable clinical care for the benefit of all patients and the public as a whole."

Explore further

Perspectives of patients in clinical trials often not considered

More information: Patient reported outcome assessment must be inclusive and equitable, Nature Medicine (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01781-8
Journal information: Nature Medicine

Citation: Patient symptom and quality of life assessments must be inclusive and equitable (2022, May 5) retrieved 3 July 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors