Shrinking liver cancer tumors before transplant yields excellent outcomes, researchers report

Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Treating liver cancer tumors to shrink them in order to allow the patient to qualify for a liver transplant leads to excellent 10-year post-transplant outcomes, according to new Mount Sinai research published in JAMA Surgery. The results validate current national policies around transplant eligibility.

Selection of patients with (HCC), the most common form of liver cancer, for transplant has been guided for more than two decades by standards known as the Milan criteria. The Milan criteria state that transplantation should be performed in those with a single tumor of five centimeters or less in diameter or three tumors that are each three centimeters or less in diameter, have no macrovascular invasion, and no metastasis. Over time, the rising incidence of HCC and in the United States have led to refinements to the selection policy, shifting the focus to guidelines that also incorporate tumor biology, response to bridging therapies, and waiting times for patients within and beyond the Milan criteria.

One aspect of the current criteria is known as downstaging: the process of applying liver directed therapy to tumors too big for the Milan criteria with the hope of reducing them to the suggested size. Downstaging is now an option in selecting suitable candidates with initial tumors that exceed the criteria. However, can recur after transplantation, either within the liver or outside of the liver. The treatment options of patients who have recurrence post transplantation is limited and prognosis is poor.

In this , a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted for 2,645 adults who had undergone transplant for HCC at five U.S. academic medical centers between January 2001 and December 2015. The analysis was performed from May 2019 through June 2021. Outcomes of 341 patients whose disease was downstaged to fit within the Milan criteria were compared with those in 2,122 patients whose disease always fit within the criteria and 182 patients whose disease was not downstaged.

The 10-year post-transplant survival and recurrence rates were, respectively, 52.1% and 20.6% among those whose disease was downstaged; 61.5% and 13.3% in those always within the criteria; and 43.3% and 41.1% in those whose disease was not downstaged.

"Our study validates national policy on downstaging prior to transplantation and shows the clear utility benefit for transplantation prioritization decision-making," said Parissa Tabrizian, MD, co-lead author on the study and Associate Professor of Surgery at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. "These results can increase the level of recommendations for the downstaging policy on a global basis. It also demonstrates that surgical management of HCC recurrence after transplantation is associated with improved survival in well-selected patients and should be pursued. The study also supports expanding the policy of downstaging applied to guidelines in Europe and Asia."

"Our study represents a solid confirmation that HCC patients effectively downstaged to Milan criteria have an outstanding median survival of 10 years, thus providing the rationale to adopt this policy on a global basis," said Josep Llovet, MD, Ph.D., co-lead author on the study and Founder and Director of the Liver Cancer Program at Mount Sinai Health System. "With this study clinical practice guidelines of management of HCC can recommend our approach with an acceptable level of evidence."

Explore further

Liver transplant patients with prior drinking problems can do well after transplantation, new study finds

More information: Parissa Tabrizian et al, Ten-Year Outcomes of Liver Transplant and Downstaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, JAMA Surgery (2022). DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2800
Journal information: JAMA Surgery

Citation: Shrinking liver cancer tumors before transplant yields excellent outcomes, researchers report (2022, July 22) retrieved 1 October 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors