This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:



Alzheimer's disease researchers extend the amyloid degradation toxicity hypothesis to the population level

Breaking the mold: Zarbio and Georgia State scientists unveil game-changing theory on Alzheimer's disease
The image shows the multicompartment model of beta-amyloid turnover and cytotoxicity (A) that resolves two central paradoxes of amyloid biomarkers—a high probability of AD diagnosis in patients with a high density of non-toxic amyloid deposits (PET signal) and a low concentration of toxic soluble beta-amyloid in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF-Aβ42). Mathematical formalization of this concept reproduces clinical data. A patient's current probability of AD diagnosis is a function of their amyloid deposit density and CSF-Aβ42. It is shown as a heat map with an overlay showing the distribution of clinical data (B). Yellow circles (AD)—data points corresponding to AD patients, green circles (NC)—to patients with normal cognition. Credit: Dr. Dmitry V. Zaretsky and Bentham Science Publishers

Despite affecting millions worldwide, Alzheimer's disease (AD) has long lacked effective treatments due to a fundamental inadequacy of our understanding of its etiology and pathogenesis. The absence of an integrative theory connecting the molecular origins of AD with disturbances at the organelle and cell levels, changes in relevant biomarkers, and population-level prevalence has hindered progress.

Even though most scientists only hope that an integrative theory of AD will emerge soon, scientists from Zarbio and Georgia State University discovered sufficient data to formulate a framework for such a theory.

The molecular and cellular levels of this framework were initially summarized as the degradation toxicity hypothesis. Diverging from previous amyloid-centric theories, it posits that beta-amyloid peptide (Aβ) enters cells through endocytosis and is transported to lysosomes for degradation. However, instead of complete degradation, some Aβ fragments form pores in lysosomal membranes, leading to cell death as lysosomal proteases leak into the cytoplasm.

The amyloid degradation toxicity hypothesis was recently extended to the in an article titled "Towards the Integrative Theory of Alzheimer's Disease: Linking Molecular Mechanisms of Neurotoxicity, Beta-Amyloid Biomarkers, and Diagnosis." Authored by Yaroslav Molkov (GSU), Maria Zaretskaia, and Dmitry Zaretsky (Zarbio), the article was published in the Current Alzheimer Research journal.

One of the central paradoxes in Alzheimer's research is the strong correlation between AD diagnosis and the high density of non-toxic amyloid deposits (senile plaques) in the brain. The density can be measured by (PET) and is an established AD biomarker.

The second paradox involves lower concentrations of toxic soluble Aβ42 in the (CSF-Aβ42, another AD ) in AD patients. Any viable hypothesis must explain these phenomena, and the manuscript does that.

According to the amyloid degradation toxicity hypothesis, cytotoxicity depends on the cellular uptake of soluble Aβ rather than the presence of amyloid aggregates. The accumulation of cellular damage defines the probability of an AD diagnosis. Also, the authors argue that spontaneous extracellular seed formation is improbable due to low Aβ concentration.

In contrast, endocytosed Aβ is concentrated and stored intra-lysosomally, where it forms aggregation seeds. Aggregation seeds cannot be digested and, when exocytosed, grow into senile plaques. Therefore, to become aggregated, Aβ needs to be taken by brain cells first. The dependence of both Aβ toxicity and aggregation on the same process—cellular uptake of Aβ—resolves both paradoxes.

To test the validity of their conclusions, the researchers used the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, the most comprehensive dataset on amyloid biomarkers. The model that formalizes the described concept reproduced at a 95% confidence level, supporting the amyloid degradation toxicity hypothesis. Notably, natural limitations on rates of cellular amyloid uptake explain the characteristic distribution of two amyloid biomarkers in the population.

"To the best of our knowledge, it is the first mechanistic explanation of why amyloid biomarkers are informative in AD diagnostics, even though they are indirectly related to the pathophysiology of the disease. Importantly, the amyloid degradation toxicity hypothesis not only addresses long-standing paradoxes but also provides a comprehensive framework that allows us to propose new pathophysiology-relevant biomarkers to diagnose or even predict AD," says Dmitry Zaretsky, the Founder of Zarbio.

"Our next goal is to use the proposed framework to identify pharmacological targets that are scientifically relevant to AD pathophysiology."

The findings from Zarbio and Georgia State University offer a promising step forward in understanding AD. They could pave the way for more effective treatments and for this debilitating disease.

More information: Yaroslav I. Molkov et al, Towards the Integrative Theory of Alzheimer's Disease: Linking Molecular Mechanisms of Neurotoxicity, Beta-amyloid Biomarkers, and the Diagnosis, Current Alzheimer Research (2023). DOI: 10.2174/1567205020666230821141745

Provided by Bentham Science Publishers
Citation: Alzheimer's disease researchers extend the amyloid degradation toxicity hypothesis to the population level (2023, December 18) retrieved 21 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Researchers identify new genes that modulate the toxicity of the protein β-amyloid, responsible for causing Alzheimer's


Feedback to editors