Academic panel urges society to stop blaming mothers for possible genetic problems

by Bob Yirka report
Pregnancy test. Credit: public domain

(Medical Xpress)—A panel of academics with members from several institutions in the U.S. has published a Comment piece in the journal Nature asking journalists to be more careful in how they portray the results of epigenetic studies. The panel, led by Sarah Richardson of Harvard University cite examples in their article of ways in which irresponsible journalism can lead to harassment and legal actions against women for behaviors during pregnancy that have not been proven to be harmful.

Epigenetics is the study of changes to DNA that are heritable and affect gene activity but not nucleotide sequence—in other words, it's looking into the impact of actions by pregnant women on not only their offspring, but generations of offspring. Such actions might include food eaten, living a stressful existence, exercising, using a particular type of shampoo, etc. In their paper the panel notes that epigenetics has been swept up into a new field of study—developmental origins of health and disease, or DOHaD, for short.

The panel isn't suggesting that studying the impact of mother's actions is a bad thing, their beef is with the way the results of such studies are being reported, e.g. with headlines meant to alarm, such as an article published recently by Discover, "Grandma's Experiences Leave a Mark on Your Genes." The impact of such headlines leaves pregnant women in a vulnerable position, they suggest, marked for observation or worse criminal prosecution. They point to studies in the 70's, as an example, where researchers discovered the clear hazards of heavy drinking while pregnant leading to . Coverage of the findings led to the widespread belief that any amount of alcohol consumed by a pregnant woman is harmful, and thus should not be allowed. But it's not true, the panelists note, recent studies suggest drinking responsibly while pregnant is not likely to cause any harm, yet if a today is seen sipping a glass of wine, she is likely to be judged adversely, reprimanded, or even prosecuted.

The panel concludes by requesting journalists follow four caveats: don't extrapolate findings on animal studies to people, point out when reporting that that there is a also a paternal role in , remember that human reproduction and genetics are very complex and not nearly fully understood, and finally, try to keep in mind that sensationalizing scientific findings can have a very real impact on readers and society as a whole, leading to an adverse impact on .

More information: Society: Don't blame the mothers, Nature 512, 131–132 (14 August 2014) DOI: 10.1038/512131a

Related Stories

Review: Effects of depression Tx in pregnancy unclear

date Aug 11, 2014

(HealthDay)—The current evidence is inadequate for assessing the benefits and harms of depression treatment in pregnancy and the postpartum period, according to a review published online July 7 in Obstetrics & ...

Guidelines issued for managing listeriosis in pregnancy

date Aug 08, 2014

(HealthDay)—Recommendations have been developed for pregnant women with presumptive exposure to Listeria monocytogenes. These guidelines were published as a Committee Opinion online Aug. 5 in Obstetrics & Gynecol ...

Recommended for you

Genetic testing in kids is fraught with complications

date Jul 02, 2015

A woman coping with the burden of familial breast cancer can't help but wonder if her young daughter will suffer the same fate. Has she inherited the same disease-causing mutation? Is it best to be prepared ...

Cause of acute liver failure in young children discovered

date Jul 02, 2015

Acute liver failure is a rare yet life-threatening disease for young children. It often occurs extremely rapidly, for example, when a child has a fever. Yet in around 50 percent of cases it is unclear as to why this happens. ...

Genome sequencing illuminates rare Aicardi syndrome

date Jul 02, 2015

As my inbox fills with ever more updates on the number of human genomes sequenced and the plummeting time and cost of next next next generation sequencing, I find myself hitting delete more and more often. ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Aug 14, 2014
Ignore what is known,
ignore "may be"
do what you want -- mostly out of ignorance --
and che sera' sera'.
Aug 15, 2014
Ignore what is known,
ignore what "may be"
do what you want -- mostly out of ignorance --
and che sera' sera'.
But one thing I agree with: NO BLAME.
If people can't or won't take personal accountability going forward, there is no point in scolding or blaming.
And Dad's role cannot be ignored. (But it is.)
Aug 15, 2014
in other words, it's looking into the impact of actions by pregnant women on not only their offspring, but generations of offspring

All (human) cells have DNA modifications to control chromatin structure, thus including sperm. Epigenetics is much more then heritable traits, it has a vitally important role in cell differentiation and cell expression profile changes.
Aug 15, 2014
Interesting regarding the alcohol. Certainly in my experience it has become absolutely taboo for pregnant mothers to have any alcohol at all.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.