Research shows temptation more powerful than individuals realize

August 3, 2009

Whether it's highlighted in major news headlines about Argentinean affairs and Ponzi schemes, or in personal battles with obesity and drug addiction, individuals regularly succumb to greed, lust and self-destructive behaviors. New research from the Kellogg School of Management examines why this is the case, and demonstrates that individuals believe they have more restraint than they actually possess--ultimately leading to poor decision-making.

The study, led by Loran Nordgren, senior lecturer of management and organizations at the Kellogg School, examined how an individual's belief in his/her ability to control impulses such as greed, drug craving and sexual arousal influenced responses to . The research found the sample, on average, displayed a "restraint bias," causing individuals to miscalculate the amount of temptation they could truly handle, in turn leading to a greater likelihood of indulging impulsive or .

"People are not good at anticipating the power of their urges, and those who are the most confident about their self-control are the most likely to give into temptation," said Nordgren. "The key is simply to avoid any situations where vices and other weaknesses thrive and, most importantly, for individuals to keep a humble view of their willpower."

In developing their case, the study's authors cited previous research demonstrating that people often have difficulty appreciating the power of impulsive states. People in a "cold state" (not experiencing hunger, anger, sexual arousal, etc.) tend to underestimate how a "hot," impulsive state will influence their behavior. To expand upon these findings, the study authors set out to test whether:

  • People in a cold, non-impulsive state will overestimate their ability to control impulses
  • People in a hot, impulsive state will have a more realistic view of their capacity for impulse control
  • People who perceive they have a high capacity for impulse control will expose themselves to more temptation and will ultimately exhibit more impulsive behavior
To test their hypotheses, the researchers conducted four experiments focusing on hunger, addiction and mental fatigue. Each experiment resulted in significant "restraint bias."

For example, one experiment focused on cigarette addiction found those who overestimated their capacity for self-control were much more likely to smoke a cigarette after simply watching a movie about smoking. Another experiment centered on hunger. Results found a satiated group was significantly less likely to return snacks than a hungry group who limited their temptation by choosing less appealing snacks.

"A system which assumes people will control themselves is going to fall prey to this restraint bias; we expose ourselves to more temptation than is wise, and subsequently we have millions of people suffering with obesity, addictions and other unhealthy lifestyles," said Nordgren. "And, while our study focused on personal behaviors like smoking and eating, it is easy to apply our findings to a broader context. Understanding the power of temptation, you might also ask about the extent to which we need oversight or regulatory guidelines for business and political leaders."

Furthermore, this research suggests observers should think twice before judging those who fall prey to temptation because most people overestimate their capacity to control their own impulses, Nordgren concluded.

More information: The study will appear in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science.

Source: Association for Psychological Science (news : web)

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Car, stroller, juice: Babies understand when words are related

November 20, 2017
The meaning behind infants' screeches, squeals and wails may frustrate and confound sleep-deprived new parents. But at an age when babies cannot yet speak to us in words, they are already avid students of language.

Simple EKG can determine whether patient has depression or bipolar disorder

November 20, 2017
A groundbreaking Loyola Medicine study suggests that a simple 15-minute electrocardiogram could help a physician determine whether a patient has major depression or bipolar disorder.

Non-fearful social withdrawal linked positively to creativity

November 20, 2017
Everyone needs an occasional break from the social ramble, though spending too much time alone can be unhealthy and there is growing evidence that the psychosocial effects of too much solitude can last a lifetime.

Cultural values can be a strong predictor of alcohol consumption

November 20, 2017
Countries with populations that value autonomy and harmony tend to have higher average levels of alcohol consumption than countries with more traditional values, such as hierarchy and being part of a collective. This new ...

A walk at the mall or the park? New study shows, for moms and daughters, a walk in the park is best

November 17, 2017
Spending time together with family may help strengthen the family bond, but new research from the University of Illinois shows that specifically spending time outside in nature—even just a 20-minute walk—together can ...

Risk of distracted driving predicted by age, gender, personality and driving frequency

November 17, 2017
New research identifies age, gender, personality and how often people drive as potential risk factors for becoming distracted while driving. Young men, extroverted or neurotic people, and people who drive more often were ...

8 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

earls
not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
You only live once.
EvgenijM
not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
That's what I think too. But being a subject - you never know what exactly is outside the subject. You can only guess it. This means that all our judgment about the world - is just assumptions, and there is no guaranty, that they are true.
dizzy999
1 / 5 (1) Aug 03, 2009
I suggest that your genes decide what you like or dislike. they also decide whether you get cancer or not. They decide whether you become addicted or not.
My father smoked like a trooper. He died aged 96 of natural causes. My sister died of cancer, aged 59. She never smoked or drank alcohol. It is in your deciding genes.
AgentG
not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
This article appears to reinforce the Buddhist teaching of avoiding temptation and not letting one's mental state ever become 'hot' as described.
el_gramador
not rated yet Aug 03, 2009
@EvgenijM - guarantee*.

At everyone else... The only way to control it is to be at an extreme of control and polarize to a view. I.e make the rules ahead of time instead of being fuzzy. And make sure pick an exact side given your leanings. You might well be able to pick the right side, but to do with that power is an act on intention and requires you to pay very close attention to things.
austux
not rated yet Aug 04, 2009
I was tempted to comment, but restrained myself.
jsh
not rated yet Aug 04, 2009
"you might also ask about the extent to which we need oversight or regulatory guidelines for business and political leaders."

So we should take the temptation away by force?

Those without self control should be allowed to grow fat, unhealthy, and unattractive. Freedom breeds intelligence.
lengould100
not rated yet Aug 04, 2009
jsh: You missed the point. It's the politicians and business leaders who need stronger regulatory oversight according to the article, and I agree. We are fools to depend on the restraint of politicians to keep our countries out of conflict.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.