Routine Antibiotic Use Reduces Mothers’ Infection Risk From C-Section

January 22, 2010 By Christe Bruderlin-Nelson, Health Behavior News Service

Having a baby by Caesarean section is becoming increasingly common, despite the higher risks associated with the surgery compared to a vaginal birth. One important concern is the risk of infection, which is between five and 20 times greater for women who undergo scheduled or emergency Caesarean section.

In fact, “the single most important risk factor for postpartum maternal infection is ,” according to a new . The researchers looked at 86 studies involving more than 13,000 women to determine whether the use of antibiotics to prevent infection was beneficial.

According to review findings, giving prophylactic — or preventive — antibiotics to women undergoing Caesarean section reduced the incidence of fever by 45 percent, by 39 percent, inflammation of the uterine lining by 38 percent and serious infectious complications for the mother by 31 percent.

“The most salient points [of the review] are that antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in preventing infectious complications post-Caesarean section, whether elective or emergency,” said lead review author Fiona Smaill, M.D, at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada

Smaill said the review did not consider specific types of antibiotics or length of treatment.

“Unfortunately this study does not tell us what impact the use of antibiotics, particularly if given before delivery, has on the infant,” said Christian Pettker, an assistant professor in obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at Yale University. Very few studies in the review looked at infant outcomes. For example, none of the studies looked at infant oral thrush, an infection of the mouth seen in or in infants on . There were no adverse effects seen in the few studies that did address the issue.

“The absence of infant outcomes,” Smaill said, “makes it difficult for women to assess the benefits versus risks. While overall any risk to the infant is likely to be minor, many women are concerned about any antibiotic exposure.”

The new review appears in the latest issue of The Cochrane Library, a publication of The Cochrane Collaboration, an international organization that evaluates medical research. Systematic reviews like this one draw evidence based conclusions about medical practice after considering both the content and quality of existing trials on a topic.

The review found benefits for antibiotic prophylaxis whether the physician administered antibiotics before or after clamping the umbilical cord. The review did not reveal which timing was better: providing the medication before or after surgery. “Both work,” Smaill said. “In general, however, prophylaxis for any other surgery is given before the incision.” She said that other studies have suggested it is better to give prophylactic medications before the Caesarean.

Pettker discussed concerns about whether the increased use of antibiotics before delivery would influence antibiotic resistance to bacteria in the hospital setting. “The Caesarean rate is rising worldwide,” she said. “In the United States, the Caesarean delivery rate is above 30 percent. Giving antibiotics to 30 percent of our obstetric population will no doubt influence the rate of resistance.” Pettker said that giving the antibiotic before surgery might also lead to increasing resistance in the infant population.

Smaill said that while antibiotic resistance is complex, “in general, the judicious use of where there is evidence of their effectiveness probably plays a minor role, if any, in the spread of antibiotic resistance.”

However, Pettker also said we should not rely on them as the only measure to prevent infection at Caesarean. “It is important for us to continue to follow other ways to prevent infections at Caesarean deliveries and to investigate other novel preventive tools. Adherence to proper sterile techniques, reductions of operative times, and proper uses of other evidence based techniques — such as spontaneous removal, rather than manual removal, of the placenta — are important tools for preventing infections as well.”

More information: Smaill FM, Gyte GML. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Marker may help target treatments for Crohn's patients

October 16, 2018
Crohn's disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory condition of the intestinal tract, has emerged as a global disease, with rates steadily increasing over the last 50 years. Experts have long suspected that CD likely represents ...

Polio: Environmental monitoring will be key as world reaches global eradication

October 15, 2018
Robust environmental monitoring should be used as the world approaches global eradication of polio, say University of Michigan researchers who recently studied the epidemiology of the 2013 silent polio outbreak in Rahat, ...

Study traces hospital-acquired bloodstream infections to patients' own bodies

October 15, 2018
The most common source of a bloodstream infection acquired during a hospital stay is not a nurse's or doctor's dirty hands, or another patient's sneeze or visitor's cough, but the patient's own gut, Stanford University School ...

Researchers make essential imaging tests safer for people at risk of acute kidney injury

October 15, 2018
Every year, millions of people undergo medical tests and procedures, such as coronary angiography, which use intravascular contrast dyes. "For the majority of patients, these are safe and necessary procedures. However, about ...

Medical marijuana might help MS patients, but uncertainty remains

October 13, 2018
Medical products derived from marijuana might have a mild benefit in treating symptoms of multiple sclerosis, based on reports from patients.

Do not give decongestants to young children for common cold symptoms, say experts

October 11, 2018
Decongestants should not be given to children under 6—and given with caution in children under 12—as there is no evidence that they alleviate symptoms such as a blocked or runny nose, and their safety is unclear, say ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.