Neuroscientists find brain system behind general intelligence

February 22, 2010, California Institute of Technology
The brain regions important for general intelligence are found in several specific places (orange regions shown on the brain on the left). Looking inside the brain reveals the connections between these regions, which are particularly important to general intelligence. In the image on the right, the brain has been made partly transparent. The big orange regions in the right image are connections (like cables) that connect the specific brain regions in the image on the left. Credit: PNAS

A collaborative team of neuroscientists at the California Institute of Technology, the University of Iowa, the University of Southern California, and the Autonomous University of Madrid have mapped the brain structures that affect general intelligence.

The study, to be published the week of February 22 in the early edition of the , adds new insight to a highly controversial question: What is , and how can we measure it?

The research team included Jan Gläscher, first author on the paper and a postdoctoral fellow at Caltech, and Ralph Adolphs, the Bren Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience and professor of biology. The Caltech scientists teamed up with researchers at the University of Iowa and USC to examine a uniquely large data set of 241 brain-lesion patients who all had taken IQ tests. The researchers mapped the location of each patient's lesion in their brains, and correlated that with each patient's IQ score to produce a map of the regions that influence intelligence.

"General intelligence, often referred to as Spearman's g-factor, has been a highly contentious concept," says Adolphs. "But the basic idea underlying it is undisputed: on average, people's scores across many different kinds of tests are correlated. Some people just get generally high scores, whereas others get generally low scores. So it is an obvious next question to ask whether such a general ability might depend on specific brain regions."

The researchers found that, rather than residing in a single structure, general intelligence is determined by a network of regions across both sides of the brain.

"One of the main findings that really struck us was that there was a distributed system here. Several brain regions, and the connections between them, were what was most important to general intelligence," explains Gläscher.

"It might have turned out that general intelligence doesn't depend on specific brain areas at all, and just has to do with how the whole brain functions," adds Adolphs. "But that's not what we found. In fact, the particular regions and connections we found are quite in line with an existing theory about intelligence called the 'parieto-frontal integration theory.' It says that general intelligence depends on the brain's ability to integrate—to pull together—several different kinds of processing, such as working memory."

The researchers say the findings will open the door to further investigations about how the brain, intelligence, and environment all interact.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Research reveals atomic-level changes in ALS-linked protein

January 18, 2018
For the first time, researchers have described atom-by-atom changes in a family of proteins linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a group of brain disorders known as frontotemporal dementia and degenerative diseases ...

Fragile X finding shows normal neurons that interact poorly

January 18, 2018
Neurons in mice afflicted with the genetic defect that causes Fragile X syndrome (FXS) appear similar to those in healthy mice, but these neurons fail to interact normally, resulting in the long-known cognitive impairments, ...

How your brain remembers what you had for dinner last night

January 17, 2018
Confirming earlier computational models, researchers at University of California San Diego and UC San Diego School of Medicine, with colleagues in Arizona and Louisiana, report that episodic memories are encoded in the hippocampus ...

Recording a thought's fleeting trip through the brain

January 17, 2018
University of California, Berkeley neuroscientists have tracked the progress of a thought through the brain, showing clearly how the prefrontal cortex at the front of the brain coordinates activity to help us act in response ...

Midbrain 'start neurons' control whether we walk or run

January 17, 2018
Locomotion comprises the most fundamental movements we perform. It is a complex sequence from initiating the first step, to stopping when we reach our goal. At the same time, locomotion is executed at different speeds to ...

Miles Davis is not Mozart: The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently

January 16, 2018
Keith Jarret, world-famous jazz pianist, once answered in an interview when asked if he would ever be interested in doing a concert where he would play both jazz and classical music: "No, that's hilarious. [...] It's like ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Birger
not rated yet Feb 23, 2010
An interesting question is if failed rivals to H. Sapiens Sapiens such as Neanderthals had a somewhat poorer integration of several regions of the brain. While we now have the Neanderthal genome, it remains to be seen if such questions can be answered by simply comparing genes with humans.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Feb 23, 2010
An interesting question is if failed rivals to H. Sapiens Sapiens such as Neanderthals had a somewhat poorer integration of several regions of the brain. While we now have the Neanderthal genome, it remains to be seen if such questions can be answered by simply comparing genes with humans.
I doubt that we can jump to such conclusions, even given our growing understanding of brain's chemistry and physiology. As long as we don't even understand Kim Peek's brain or those of other "savants" no genome analysis will help us to understand the Neanderthal's brain.
And this doesn't even take into account the heavy cultural bias hidden in the word "intelligence".
rincewind
not rated yet Feb 23, 2010
Exactly frajo, there is an inherent subjectivity & bias in the word "intelligence". A more abstract definition that I prefer is to say that intelligence is "the ability of an entity to adapt & thrive in arbitrary environments". Humans have an uncanny ability to adapt to environments due to the structure of our brain, but this is not the only path to 'intelligence'.

general intelligence depends on the brain's ability to integrate—to pull together—several different kinds of processing, such as working memory


The first Artificial General Intelligence may one day arise from the dynamics of a search engine - something that specializes in integrating different kinds of information processes & memory.
knightcap
not rated yet Feb 23, 2010
Mr Goertzel and the team at OpenCog might be interested in this, though if I just found it, I am sure they would have alreay.

According to PNAS - "General intelligence (g) captures the performance variance shared across cognitive tasks and correlates with real-world success...." - http://www.pnas.o...945a520e
It suggests that the distributed and connected regions of the brain that general intelligence draws upon are those that integrate verbal, visuospatial, working memory, and executive processes.

Interesting, but where to from here? Investigation to further understanding the biological factors, effects of drugs and brain damage on general intelligence, the emergence of general intelligence through evolution, perhaps an insight into the neural collerates of 'consciousness', and even more data to develop autonomous intelligent agents, and then true artificial general intelligence...exciting times ahead!
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Feb 24, 2010
It suggests that the distributed and connected regions of the brain that general intelligence draws upon are those that integrate verbal, visuospatial, working memory, and executive processes.
This does not suffice as it doesn't take into account the intelligence of the blind, the deaf, the dumb.
Meet Helen Keller.
VerGreeneyes
3 / 5 (1) Feb 24, 2010
@frajo It might not be entirely unfair - just because the blind, the deaf or the dumb have damaged sensory input, that doesn't mean they don't still use these parts of their brains. Indeed, they might be able to better apply them to whatever 'general intelligence' is due to the decreased sensory activity.
frajo
1 / 5 (1) Feb 24, 2010
just because the blind, the deaf or the dumb have damaged sensory input, that doesn't mean they don't still use these parts of their brains. Indeed, they might be able to better apply them to whatever 'general intelligence' is due to the decreased sensory activity.
Yes, and AFAIK it has already been proven that these parts of the brain are used for other processes when not for the standard ones.
Maybe it is only an unfortunate wording, but in the case of the blind, the dumb, and the deaf there is intelligence although there is no region that integrates verbal and visuospatial processes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.