Manipulating the Brain Network Could Improve IQ

June 10, 2009 by Lisa Zyga weblog
Brain
Credit: University of Wisconsin and Michigan State Comparative Mammalian Brain Collections and the National Museum of Health and Medicine

In an attempt to investigate why some brains are more intelligent than others, researchers have found that efficient wiring between different brain regions is associated with a higher IQ. This understanding could potentially lead to the development of drugs that could improve IQ by improving the brain's network efficiency.

Martijn van den Heuvel, a neuroscientist at Utrecht University Medical Center who led the new study, explained that the concept of a networked brain is similar to a transportation grid, with the brain using its network to send information from one region to another.

In their study, the scientists scanned the brains of 19 subjects at rest using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Because the brains were at rest, the revealed the "default" underlying connectivity between . Brain connectivity reflects how many steps are required to send information between different regions of the brain.

When comparing the connectivity networks, the researchers found a link between connectivity efficiency and the subject's IQ, with connectivity explaining about 30% of the difference between subjects. However, the researchers did not find a link between the total number of connections in the brain and IQ. "We show that more intelligent people don't have more connections, but they have more efficiently placed connections," van den Heuvel said.

In the future, the scientists hope to investigate the possibilities of manipulating the brain's connectivity efficiency in order to create more efficient brain networks, and possibly boost IQ. Previous research has found a genetic component to white matter in the , which is also related to intelligence. By understanding how these genes work, scientists may be able to figure out how to manipulate the genes, leading to improved intelligence.

More information: Journal of Neuroscience (DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1442-09.2009)

Via: New Scientist

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Pickled in 'cognac', Chopin's heart gives up its secrets

November 26, 2017
The heart of Frederic Chopin, among the world's most cherished musical virtuosos, may finally have given up the cause of his untimely death.

Sugar industry withheld evidence of sucrose's health effects nearly 50 years ago

November 21, 2017
A U.S. sugar industry trade group appears to have pulled the plug on a study that was producing animal evidence linking sucrose to disease nearly 50 years ago, researchers argue in a paper publishing on November 21 in the ...

Female researchers pay more attention to sex and gender in medicine

November 7, 2017
When women participate in a medical research paper, that research is more likely to take into account the differences between the way men and women react to diseases and treatments, according to a new study by Stanford researchers.

Drug therapy from lethal bacteria could reduce kidney transplant rejection

August 3, 2017
An experimental treatment derived from a potentially deadly microorganism may provide lifesaving help for kidney transplant patients, according to an international study led by investigators at Cedars-Sinai.

Exploring the potential of human echolocation

June 25, 2017
People who are visually impaired will often use a cane to feel out their surroundings. With training and practice, people can learn to use the pitch, loudness and timbre of echoes from the cane or other sounds to navigate ...

Team eradicates hepatitis C in 10 patients following lifesaving transplants from infected donors

April 30, 2017
Ten patients at Penn Medicine have been cured of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) following lifesaving kidney transplants from deceased donors who were infected with the disease. The findings point to new strategies for increasing ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Myria83
4 / 5 (1) Jun 10, 2009
..."with connectivity explaining about 30% of the difference between subjects"...

How can they draw this kind of conclusions from a study involving 19 subjects only?
no1enter
not rated yet Jun 10, 2009
Probably because its to expensive to bring in more people for the study, as the companies that 'rent' the use of MRI machines charge so much do to the multi-million dollar cost of each machine.
El_Nose
not rated yet Jun 10, 2009
I remember a movie called lawnmower man by stephn king that had a similair concept. The new super genius man then takes over the world because he became too aggressive.

I wonder what effect effecient pathways have on things like aggression, passion, and decision making. Will this reworking affects the pituitary gland especially.
gmurphy
5 / 5 (1) Jun 10, 2009
Myria83, good point.
GlenM
not rated yet Jun 10, 2009
I have done some research in this area. Making intraareal connections or even distant interareal ones is very difficult once the giant depolarizing potentials have stopped. Making such long range connections after the cessation of GDPs would be very disruptive.
jimbo92107
not rated yet Jun 11, 2009
I held a magnet to my head once. It didn't make me smarter, but I felt more attractive...
PinkElephant
not rated yet Jun 28, 2009
I'd be careful trying to boost the brain's connectivity willy-nilly. Some nasty side-effects may emerge if it isn't done just right: like grand mal seizures, for example...

There's probably a good reason why most modern brains aren't as optimal as they could theoretically be. There's got to be a cost to genius: some get lucky and don't have to pay the piper; others may end up in institutions or dead... or maybe something more prosaic, such as failing to procreate...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.