Similar structures for face selectivity in human and monkey brains

April 28, 2011, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

(Medical Xpress) -- Face recognition and the interpretation of facial expressions and gaze direction play a key role in guiding the social behavior of human beings, and new study results point to similar mechanisms in macaques. Until now, many scientists have assumed that the capability for face recognition in monkeys is significantly different from that in humans – and that different parts of the brain are involved. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics in Tübingen have now discovered that the circuitry for face processing in the brain is remarkably similar in both macaques and humans. Consequently, macaque monkeys could be suitable model organisms for studying human disorders such as autism or prosopagnosia, so-called “face blindness.”

Very early in life children learn to recognize the faces of their parents and other human beings around them. In addition, humans must be able to process the cues from and gaze direction in a matter of seconds. These complex tasks are performed by a number of areas, mainly in the superior temporal sulcus and the ventral temporal cortex. It is here that the fusiform face area (FFA) is located, the most important structure involved in face selectivity in humans.

In previous studies in , only areas in the superior temporal sulcus had shown activity in processing facial information, and it was assumed that this discrepancy resulted from a species difference. “However, macaque monkeys live in groups of many individuals and have sophisticated . Vision is the main part of their communication, so I expected them to have sophisticated brain structures for as well”, says Jozien Goense from the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics.

Together with her colleagues from the same Institute Shih-Pi Ku and Nikos Logothetis, Director of the Department of Physiology of Cognitive Processes, and Andreas Tolias, now in Houston with Baylor College of Medicine, the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Rice University, Jozien Goense mapped the face-processing brain network in macaques. (fMRI) reveals the activity of brain areas at a given time. The scientists made use of an optimized fMRI protocol that overcame the trouble with artifacts encountered in older studies, especially in the important ventral temporal lobe.

In the new experiments, the monkeys were shown pictures of unknown conspecifics displaying different facial expressions and gaze directions. The goal was to activate areas and neuronal structures that respond to identity and social cues. As a control, the responses to monkey faces were compared with reactions to pictures of fruit, houses and the abstract fractal patterns. The scientists found face-selective areas in the superior temporal sulcus, the prefrontal cortex and amygdala, which had been identified in previous studies. In addition, several patches in the ventral temporal lobe, the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex and medial temporal lobe were shown to be active in the processing of facial information. The experiments were repeated in anesthetized macaques to eliminate the effects of motion and to test whether the activity depended on awake processing. The difference was minimal; the face-selective network was almost identical under anesthesia.

Jozien Goense sees her hypothesis confirmed that it was only technical limitations that led earlier scientists to assume that significantly fewer areas were active in face processing in the monkey brain than the human brain: “We know from our results that the network is larger than previously published. We have discovered several additional areas in the ventral temporal lobe which include a potential homologue of the fusiform face area in humans”, she says. Further studies still need to be done to test whether the similarities in the brain structures involved in face selectivity in humans and could help to investigate certain human illnesses. One example is prosopagnosia, which specifically affects the recognition of faces. The persons concerned are not able to memorize the of others and cannot even recognize their family members by vision alone, while the detailed differentiation of objects or even animals poses no problems.

More information: Shih-Pi Ku, Andreas S. Tolias, Nikos K. Logothetis and Jozien Goense, fMRI of the Face-Processing Network in the Ventral Temporal Lobe of Awake and Anesthetized Macaques, Neuron (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.048

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Research reveals atomic-level changes in ALS-linked protein

January 18, 2018
For the first time, researchers have described atom-by-atom changes in a family of proteins linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a group of brain disorders known as frontotemporal dementia and degenerative diseases ...

Fragile X finding shows normal neurons that interact poorly

January 18, 2018
Neurons in mice afflicted with the genetic defect that causes Fragile X syndrome (FXS) appear similar to those in healthy mice, but these neurons fail to interact normally, resulting in the long-known cognitive impairments, ...

How your brain remembers what you had for dinner last night

January 17, 2018
Confirming earlier computational models, researchers at University of California San Diego and UC San Diego School of Medicine, with colleagues in Arizona and Louisiana, report that episodic memories are encoded in the hippocampus ...

Recording a thought's fleeting trip through the brain

January 17, 2018
University of California, Berkeley neuroscientists have tracked the progress of a thought through the brain, showing clearly how the prefrontal cortex at the front of the brain coordinates activity to help us act in response ...

Midbrain 'start neurons' control whether we walk or run

January 17, 2018
Locomotion comprises the most fundamental movements we perform. It is a complex sequence from initiating the first step, to stopping when we reach our goal. At the same time, locomotion is executed at different speeds to ...

Miles Davis is not Mozart: The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently

January 16, 2018
Keith Jarret, world-famous jazz pianist, once answered in an interview when asked if he would ever be interested in doing a concert where he would play both jazz and classical music: "No, that's hilarious. [...] It's like ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.