The pilot and autopilot within our mind-brain connection: Conscious vs. unconscious, habit vs. non-habit examined

January 11, 2013, Brandeis University

(Medical Xpress)—Have you ever driven to work so deep in thought that you arrive safely yet can't recall the drive itself?  And if so, what part of  "you" was detecting cars and pedestrians, making appropriate stops and turns?  Although when you get to work you can't remember the driving experience, you are likely to have exquisite memory about having planned your day.

How does one understand this common experience? This is the question posed by Professor of Biology, John Lisman and his former undergraduate student, Eliezer J. Sternberg, now in medical school, in a recent paper in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.  Lisman explains that once a task such as driving has become a , you can perform another task at the same time, such as planning your day.  But looking closer at these two behaviors, driving and planning, one can see interesting differences. The Habit system that is driving you to work is non-flexible: if the new parking regulations at work require you to go left instead or right, the that you'll go right is very high. On the other hand, if you heard yesterday that your boss has scheduled a group meeting for noon, the likehood that you'll plan your day accordingly is high. In other words, your non-habit system is flexible.

What interests Lisman and Sternberg is the of the habit/non-habit systems to concepts of conscious vs unconscious. These concepts were popularized by Freud, who posited a duality of the human mind.  Behavior can be influenced by both the conscious system and unconscious system. Freud compared the mind to an iceberg——with the small conscious system above water and the larger unconscious system below.  Modern cognitive neuroscience now accepts this duality.

The mind can be described as having an unconscious and conscious part.  And the can be described as having both habit and non-habit systems.  Lisman and Sternberg argue that these two views can be merged: there is a habit system of which we are unconscious and a non-habit system of which we are conscious.

This simple equation turns out to have enormous implications for research on the mind-brain connection. Experiments on consciousness are done in humans because you can ask them to report their awareness, something you can't do with animals. On the other hand, there are many invasive procedures for studying what's happening in the brain of animals.  So how can you study consciousness in rats? 

Lisman and Sternberg provide a simple answer—ask whether rats have habit and non-habits. Scientific literature demonstrates that rats indeed have both habits and non-habits. For instance, when a rat comes to a choice point on a maze (and the reward site is to left), rats display very different behavior depending on how much experience they've had with that maze.  With relatively little experience, rats pause at the choice point and look both ways before making a decision; in contrast, a highly experienced rats zooms left without stopping. Experiments have shown that different parts of the brain are involved in these two phases.  Lisman and Sternberg make two conclusions: first, that rats, like us, have conscious and unconscious parts of the brain and second, that from experiments on rats we can learn to identify the parts of the brain that mediate conscious vs unconscious processes.

In their paper, Lisman and Sternberg also discuss potential objections to their hypothesis, and suggest further tests.

"Our tentative conclusion is that it is reasonable to equate the habit system with unconscious processing and the non-habit system with conscious processing," says Lisman. "We further argue that both systems are capable of sensory processing and action but utilize different brain regions, have access to different forms of memory, and excel at different computations."

For instance, only the conscious system can store and recall information from episodic system, a process mediated by a structure called the hippocampus.

The benefit of such a dual system, Lisman says, is that it gives an organism the ability to multitask; the unconscious system can execute background tasks, leaving the conscious system to perform more difficult tasks, such as mentally preparing for a presentation while driving to work.

"Understanding how different brain regions function together to produce behavior is a major goal of modern neuroscience," says Lisman. "If both the conscious and unconscious system can process sensory information and produce actions, there must be mechanisms that determine which system will control behavior."

In some cases, he says, the underlying logic is simple, as in multitasking, where the unconscious controls the routine behavior. But, in other cases, he says, the logic of control is less clear; you may decide to go on a diet yet suddenly find yourself removing ice cream from the freezer. The study of habit and non-habit behavior in animals provides a path toward understanding how conscious and unconscious systems compete for control.
Lisman says he hopes his effort to unify the understanding of conscious and unconscious systems and habit and non-habit systems will lead to a better understanding of what we are as human beings.

Explore further: Neuroscientists identify a brain region that can switch between new and old habits

Related Stories

Neuroscientists identify a brain region that can switch between new and old habits

October 30, 2012
Habits are behaviors wired so deeply in our brains that we perform them automatically. This allows you to follow the same route to work every day without thinking about it, liberating your brain to ponder other things, such ...

Psychologists reveal how emotion can shut down high-level mental processes without our knowledge

May 8, 2012
Psychologists at Bangor University believe that they have glimpsed for the first time, a process that takes place deep within our unconscious brain, where primal reactions interact with higher mental processes. Writing in ...

Freud's theory of unconscious conflict linked to anxiety symptoms in new brain research

June 17, 2012
An experiment that Sigmund Freud could never have imagined 100 years ago may help lend scientific support for one of his key theories, and help connect it with current neuroscience.

When the brain remembers but the patient doesn't

July 14, 2011
Brain damage can cause significant changes in behaviour, such as loss of cognitive skills, but also reveals much about how the nervous system deals with consciousness. New findings reported in the July 2011 issue of Elsevier's ...

Recommended for you

Research reveals atomic-level changes in ALS-linked protein

January 18, 2018
For the first time, researchers have described atom-by-atom changes in a family of proteins linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a group of brain disorders known as frontotemporal dementia and degenerative diseases ...

Fragile X finding shows normal neurons that interact poorly

January 18, 2018
Neurons in mice afflicted with the genetic defect that causes Fragile X syndrome (FXS) appear similar to those in healthy mice, but these neurons fail to interact normally, resulting in the long-known cognitive impairments, ...

How your brain remembers what you had for dinner last night

January 17, 2018
Confirming earlier computational models, researchers at University of California San Diego and UC San Diego School of Medicine, with colleagues in Arizona and Louisiana, report that episodic memories are encoded in the hippocampus ...

Recording a thought's fleeting trip through the brain

January 17, 2018
University of California, Berkeley neuroscientists have tracked the progress of a thought through the brain, showing clearly how the prefrontal cortex at the front of the brain coordinates activity to help us act in response ...

Midbrain 'start neurons' control whether we walk or run

January 17, 2018
Locomotion comprises the most fundamental movements we perform. It is a complex sequence from initiating the first step, to stopping when we reach our goal. At the same time, locomotion is executed at different speeds to ...

Miles Davis is not Mozart: The brains of jazz and classical pianists work differently

January 16, 2018
Keith Jarret, world-famous jazz pianist, once answered in an interview when asked if he would ever be interested in doing a concert where he would play both jazz and classical music: "No, that's hilarious. [...] It's like ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jan 11, 2013
Have you ever driven to work so deep in thought that you arrive safely yet can't recall the drive itself? And if so, what part of "you" was detecting cars and pedestrians, making appropriate stops and turns?

The same parts as always. I just simply lack the memory of performing these tasks because I didn't commit it to long term memory.

Very often I do something that requires me to remember a previous action. Let's simplify it as: if I remember that I have done A then I will do B. Later on I will only remember doing B and have no recollection of doing A, but since know I have done B then at some point I must have had a memory of doing A.

That to me means, that the action A was a concious act just the same as any. Only the memory of it has faded. In my opinion, the "unconcious" is simply that which we fail to remember doing after the fact - while during the act itself there is only concious action.
not rated yet Jan 15, 2013
Years ago, as a radio operator in the Navy, I read/decoded audible morse code. Nowhere has the duality of the brain been more evident to me than during long sessions of reading audible morse code (up to 35 wpm). While reading (listening) my hearing and writing was unconciously linked. I was able to keep up ONLY while I was not actively (conciously) decoding the dots and dashes I heard.

I remember sessions of 20 mins or more where my mind would wander and I would plan my weekend while I kept on decoding morse code without any concious effort. In fact, I was more likely to trip up trying to actively decode the sounds or anticipate the next word than when my mind wandered.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.