Overinterpretation common in diagnostic accuracy studies

May 15, 2013
Overinterpretation common in diagnostic accuracy studies
Roughly three in 10 diagnostic accuracy studies published in journals with impact factors of four or higher have overinterpretation, according to a review published in the May issue of Radiology.

(HealthDay)—Roughly three in 10 diagnostic accuracy studies published in journals with impact factors of four or higher have overinterpretation, according to a review published in the May issue of Radiology.

Eleanor A. Ochodo, M.B.Ch.B., from University of Amsterdam, and colleagues conducted a literature review to identify diagnostic accuracy studies published between January and June 2010 in journals with an of four or higher. Primary studies of the accuracy of one or more tests compared with a clinical reference standard were included.

The researchers found that 39 of 126 studies (31 percent) contained a form of actual overinterpretation, including 29 (23 percent) with an overly optimistic abstract, 10 (8 percent) with a between the study aim and conclusion, and eight with conclusions based on selected subgroups. Authors of 89, 88, and 57 percent of the studies, respectively, did not include a sample size calculation, did not state a test hypothesis, and did not report confidence intervals of accuracy measurements, all demonstrating potential overinterpretation. Analyzing a subgroup of imaging studies found that 16 (30 percent) and 53 (100 percent) contained forms of actual and potential overinterpretation, respectively.

"Overinterpretation and misreporting of results in studies is frequent in journals with high impact factors," the authors write.

Explore further: Standard criteria needed for spinal stenosis diagnosis

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Related Stories

Tomosynthesis ups accuracy of digital mammography

January 4, 2013

(HealthDay)—Using a combination of tomosynthesis, which produces a three-dimensional reconstruction of the breast, with digital mammography increases radiologists' diagnostic accuracy and significantly lowers the number ...

Recent improvement in 3D ECHO accuracy for LV mass

May 3, 2012

(HealthDay) -- In the past decade there has been an improvement in the accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) for measurement of left ventricular (LV) mass, according to a meta-analysis published online April ...

Tests don't predict outcome after spine fusion for back pain

November 15, 2012

(HealthDay)—Currently, there is no test available to reliably predict which patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) will achieve a good clinical outcome after spinal fusion surgery, according to the results of a literature ...

Recommended for you

Scientists discover gene that blocks spread of colon cancer

April 21, 2017

Researchers from RCSI (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland) and the University of Nice, France, have discovered the function of a gene called KCNQ1 that is directly related to the survival of colon cancer patients. The ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.